Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 432

What’s the truth about stagflation?

Stagflation occurs when growth stalls, inflation surges and unemployment stays stubbornly high. It’s unsettling when the term starts getting global attention, as it is now, but are we really facing the first resurgence of stagflation in 40 years?

If ‘stagflation’ talk is referring back to the oil shocks of the 1970s – when the US fell into recession as inflation rose sharply – we’re only there metaphorically. In other words, the US, and the global economy more broadly, currently seem far from recession.

In the 1970s the US suffered five quarters of negative real gross domestic product (GDP) growth in 1974 and 1975, and while ‘supply shocks’ are hitting us now as they did then, the comparison only goes so far.

First, while the global economy is suffering simultaneous downward pressure on activity and upward pressure on prices, economic activity in advanced economies remains well-supported, even if growth forecasts are vulnerable to the downside.

Second, to the extent the 1970s contains some lessons, it is possible that that decade reinforces the ‘transitory’ effect of supply shocks on inflation, since inflation did fall meaningfully in the US after the first oil shock in 1973-74.

Finally, while the US has a bigger ‘flation’ problem than a ‘stag’ problem, we continue to underline the risks to global activity coming from China, where ‘stag’ seems to be the dominant risk now, holding out the possibility that China is in for a deeper and longer slowdown than the market is currently braced for.

Trade growth looks particularly vulnerable

Breaks in global transport network supply chains are increasingly apparent, and power shortages in China may put downward pressure on trade growth as a result of the widespread hit to Chinese manufacturing that’s currently occurring.

Simultaneous upward pressure on prices and downward pressure on activity are especially clear now in Europe and the US.

Growth remains strong, but ‘stagflation’ headwinds to the Eurozone economy are blowing ever stronger, and in the US where job growth has proved disappointing. In the Eurozone, supply shortages which had already triggered a decoupling of production from orders are now aggravated by a huge spike in energy prices.

While energy accounts for only 3% of firms’ production cost on average across the EU, some sectors such as land and air transport or power generation will suffer significantly, and rationing could affect others.

This increases risk of business closures and insolvencies, with knock-on effects to the wider economy. Households spend 5% of the consumption basket on energy, and although we expect government intervention to cushion some of the impact of rising energy prices, we still expect 10% to 20% price increases, cutting disposable incomes by 0.5-1%.

Falling energy prices later in 2022 will then drive the reverse effect but shift growth from 2022 to 2023. Yet with GDP growth next year expected to be close to 4% both in the Eurozone and in the US, we remain far from ‘stag’ risks in economies whose potential growth is below 2%.

‘Stagflation’ in a metaphorical sense has been evident for months

As markets are forward looking, the potential for inflation and economic surprises has already been priced into market indices, reducing the risk of shock and policy intervention.

‘Stagflation’ also implies recession, and as we have noted, we see this as a remote risk on current data.

While there is no formal definition of stagflation, the term entered public consciousness in the 1970s against a background of a genuine collapse in economic activity as inflationary pressures simultaneously surged.

What makes the 1970s especially interesting as a historical parallel is that, as today, the proximate cause was a negative supply shock, in the form of a sharp increase in food prices and, especially, in energy prices following OPEC’s announcement in October 1973 that the posted price of oil would rise from US$3.01 per barrel to US$5.11.

This was followed by a decision a few days later to cut off oil shipments to the US, causing a further surge in the price. In the US at least, the inflation problem was accentuated by the end of the wage-price controls that the Nixon administration had introduced after suspending the dollar’s convertibility into gold in the summer of 1971.

The result of these actions caused chaos in the global economy, as world GDP growth fell from 6.3% in 1973 to 1.2% in 1975, and the US itself suffered five consecutive quarters of negative year-on-year GDP growth starting in Q2 1974.

What are the parallels to the 1970s?

The real price of energy has risen sharply recently, but its impact is less significant than it was 50 years ago. It is clear that while real oil prices are still quite low compared to historical pressure points, the real price of gas is indeed a concern on the face of it, reaching historically high levels.

Yet the macro impact of elevated energy prices isn’t what it used to be; diversified supply, alternative energy supplies, country fuel stockpiles and lessons learnt from previous shocks has led to the decline of energy’s impact on GDP over the past 50 years.

It would take a near-unimaginable rise in energy prices to induce a global recession, unless high energy prices shock financial markets.

To illustrate how far we are from recession, it is worth referring to an exercise based on simulations in the Oxford Economics Model. In order to get that model to predict near-zero global growth next year, a US$500 a barrel oil price is needed to shock the current baseline scenario.

In our view, while energy has the potential to create shocks the larger risk to lower growth lies with China, particularly as Chinese authorities seem determined to change the nation’s growth model and wean the economy off its dependence on real estate.

 

David Lubin is Head of Emerging Markets Economics for Citi, a sponsor of Firstlinks. Information contained in this article is general in nature and does not take into account your personal situation.

For other articles by Citi, see here.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

The coiled spring: markets are primed for the year ahead

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Meg on SMSFs – More on future-proofing your fund

Single-member SMSFs face challenges where the eventual beneficiaries (or support team in the event of incapacity) will be the member’s adult children. Even worse, what happens if one or more of the children live overseas?

Latest Updates

Superannuation

'It’s your money' schemes transfer super from young to old

Policy proposals allow young people to access their super for a home bought from older people who put the money back into super. It helps some first buyers into a home earlier but it may push up prices.

Investment strategies

Rising recession risk and what it means for your portfolio

In this environment, safe-haven assets like Government bonds act as a diversifier given the uncorrelated nature to equities during periods of risk-off, while offering a yield above term deposit rates.

Investment strategies

‘Multidiscipline’: the secret of Bezos' and Buffett’s wild success

A key attribute of great investors is the ability to abstract away the specifics of a particular domain, leaving only the important underlying principles upon which great investments can be made.

Superannuation

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Shares

Confession season is upon us: What’s next for equity markets

Companies tend to pre-position weak results ahead of 30 June, leading to earnings downgrades. The next two months will be critical for investors as a shift from ‘great expectations’ to ‘clear explanations’ gets underway.

Economy

Australia, the Lucky Country again?

We may have been extremely unlucky with the unforgiving weather plaguing the East Coast of Australia this year. However, on the economic front we are by many measures in a strong position relative to the rest of the world.

Exchange traded products

LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

Discounts on LICs and LITs vary with market conditions, and many prominent managers have seen the value of their assets fall as well as discount widen. There may be opportunities for gains if discounts narrow.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.