Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 448

Why AI is today’s most important investment theme

Most investors are aware that artificial intelligence, or AI, is an important transformation. But many still underestimate the sheer world and life-changing power of this revolution and its investment potential.

AI will recast and refashion every aspect of life: how we consume, how we work, how we monitor industrial machines, how we deliver healthcare, how wars are won, and how we solve climate change.

Not only is software eating the world, but it is becoming a lot smarter at an accelerating rate and will continue to do so. Why? Because of AI - and more specifically, machine learning (ML) - the most common and practically applicable subset of AI today.

There are myriad ways investors can profit from this AI transformation, but the world’s leading cloud computing providers, or ‘hyperscalers’, particularly Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet (owner of Google) are one of the safest and surest ways to win.

Many investors perceive these mega-tech businesses as ‘well-understood’, ‘mature’ and sometimes even ‘boring’. We disagree. We believe AI will spark a new phase of hypergrowth for these companies that will take investors by surprise and trigger a big re-rating of their shares.

The hyperscalers are uniquely positioned to create an ‘AI fly wheel’ – a virtuous cycle where they use their existing scale, technological advantages, huge R&D spending, and barriers-to-entry to both drive and dominate the surging demand for compute and storage that AI creates.

There are 6 forces underpinning the AI revolution, how these benefit the hyperscalers, and why the market is significantly undervaluing the potential of AI to spark a new growth phase for Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet, which creates a major opportunity for investors to safely profit from AI.

1. Hyperscalers are democratising AI

The world’s hyperscalers are investing heavily in low code/no code interfaces (including, for example, drag and drop interfaces and natural-language-to-code translators) to democratise the development of AI-based enterprise applications so they are used by more and more employees of the cloud providers’ customers.

The highly complex and expensive ML models underlying these applications have largely been developed by the hyperscalers and are essentially ‘given away’ free. Any customer can essentially take an ML model ‘off the shelf’ and relatively easily and cheaply adapt and customise it to their own needs using their own internal datasets.

The quid pro quo? The customer must use the hyperscalers’ compute and storage services.

2. The Internet of Things (IoT)/ 'edge' reaches a tipping point

The second driver of massive demand for compute and storage services delivered by hyperscalers is that AI is increasingly being incorporated into every software application in every device. This includes IoT for which we are about to see an explosion in smart devices, deployed at the 'edge', built to be used across all aspects of life.

The sheer volume of edge devices, as alluded to by the chart above, will ensure that AI on the edge is going to be a much bigger business than AI in the cloud.

3. ML drives surging demand for compute and storage

The effect of incorporating ML into applications is a significant increase in compute and storage intensity, which will benefit hyperscalers. The more successful an AI application is at continually extracting additional relevant data to virtuously improve the accuracy of the embedded ML models, the vastly more compute and storage that is required.

This is great news for the global hyperscaler oligopolies that supply the world’s compute and storage, in particular Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet (Google). It is similarly positive for China’s cloud oligopoly, Alibaba, Tencent and Huawei, though the Chinese addressable cloud market is considerably smaller and some years behind in development.

4. Hyperscalers set to dominate ‘ASICs’ – the new wave of chips powering AI

Another reason that hyperscalers are positioned to win from AI is that they are at the cutting edge of developing new chips – Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) – that will dominate in coming years.

AI applications are simply becoming so large and complex that traditional chips are increasingly too slow, energy intensive and expensive for these purposes. So increasingly compute is becoming application-specific – both in the cloud and at the edge. This form of compute is being delivered by ASICs, which are designed on a more bespoke basis so they are more economical for the specific nature of the task to be undertaken.

5. Hyperscalers lead race to develop energy efficient compute, an important driver of our planet overcoming climate change challenges

Successful innovation on chip energy efficiency is an imperative for the long-term proliferation of AI. Given the enormous economic incentives at play, there is a high probability the hyperscalers will lead this innovation. Not only will this have a positive direct impact on the world's physical environment, but the enabling of increasingly powerful AI will likely, itself, resolve many of the challenges the world needs to overcome to mitigate climate change risks.

Today’s hyperscalers will continue to invest heavily in ASIC design at a scale that will not be matched even by today’s leading chip designers. Not only will ASIC improvements reduce the energy intensity of compute – clearly a first-order positive for the world’s climate – but the enabling of increasingly powerful AI resolve many of the challenges the world needs to overcome to mitigate climate change risks. That will include climate risk detection models to grid scheduling algorithms, new fuel-material discovery, waste-reduction algorithms, supply chain optimisations, shared mobility, precision agriculture, and infrastructure design.

6. Hyperscalers will benefit from growing barriers-to-entry that makes them long-term winners from AI

Today’s hyperscalers have a significant lead over competitors and it is highly likely this lead will only extend over time. The ‘barriers to entry’ in the space are already very high – and rapidly growing higher, all but eliminating the realistic prospects of a major new competitor materialising.

Most of the world’s large corporates and governments already rely on these businesses for their cloud infrastructure and many of their mission-critical IT platform and enterprise application services. But as powerful ML models are increasingly built into services, these services become ‘must haves’ for customers, driving greater adoption.

Second, the scale advantages enjoyed by today’s hyperscalers are much more significant than many investors appreciate and will likely continue to strengthen over time. These represent enormous barriers to entry by enabling investments in capex and R&D (such as the expensive training of powerful ML models, for example) that cannot be rivalled by competitors. It is these investments that have created the early lead in AI for today’s hyperscalers. And this lead is growing rapidly thanks to new investments in the space each year.

Own today’s hyperscalers to win in AI

AI will drive much, much more demand for compute and storage – both in the cloud and at the edge – than many are expecting today. Furthermore, this growth is largely assured, the long-term winners are already known today with a high degree of certainty, and we believe the current stock prices of these businesses are failing to adequately reflect what is on the horizon.

It appears highly plausible that hyperscaler revenue expectations are far too low in the context of the scale of the AI-based opportunity that lies ahead. If so, then Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet – as well as Alibaba and Tencent – will likely surprise investors substantially to the upside over the coming years.

Investors should also remember that the enormous R&D being incurred by the hyperscalers, while expensed fully each period to satisfy accounting rules, represents an economic investment in future earnings power. Through this lens, hyperscaler earnings power today is ‘artificially’ understated – and valuation multiples, therefore, overstated.

The conclusion is clear: to win from the AI revolution, own today’s hyperscalers, Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet (Google).


Andrew Macken is Chief Investment Officer at Montaka Global Investments. This article is general information and is based on an understanding of current legislation. 

This article is a summary of Montaka’s latest whitepaper titled: The Amazing Hyperscalers: Why epoch-defining AI is today’s most important investment theme


March 04, 2022

I concur with John Dent. You have recommended companies that few Australians would invest in directly. BrainChip's (BRN) AI technology is incorporated into the latest Mercedes concept car that is expected to be on the road in 2 years. And that is only one area that their AI technology will lead these companies you mention.

March 04, 2022

I welcome AI in some rather basic technologies. I am continuously annoyed at how dumb traffic lights are! If we can detect one face from thousands in an airport surely seeing how much traffic (if any!) is waiting at an intersection can't be that hard.

Eleanor Martin
March 09, 2022

excellent point Steve

March 04, 2022

I like the idea of investing in AI but I worry it's at an expensive valuation for three tech stocks you profile.

John Dent
March 03, 2022

This report takes the easiest route with little background research. Either that or you assume that they will continue to just buy out the competition. I think that you should take note of one of most recent failures in the acquisition space. The political intervention in the NVIDIA takeover of ARM is a case in point of distaste of monopolies. The complete apparent ignorance of the only company with first and only commercially available intelligent AI chip on the market, namely BrainChip, is another sizeable hole in your AI research.

Andrew Macken
March 03, 2022

Hi John, there is limited space available in any newsletter and this article is a summary of considerable work by our team. We focus on deep research at Montaka and to that end there is a longer 5000 word research paper behind this article. We are also continually researching so our work here is always ongoing. As for BrainChip, we observed that Amazon and Alphabet, for example, each spend as much in R&D every 2 hours as BrainChip does in a full year. So there is a sizeable difference in scale here.


Leave a Comment:



Why the four tech giants are not expensive

Is your portfolio too heavy on technology stocks?

Why the tech giants still impress


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates


Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?


Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.


Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.