Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 559

Why commodities deserve a place in portfolios

Take out the second half of 2023, when we moved to a neutral view, and we have been positive on commodities since way back in October 2020. At the time, we cited the ‘reflationary forces’ likely to be unleashed as we left the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic behind us. A few weeks later came news of a successful vaccine.

A lot has happened since then. So, why have commodities been such a persistent overweight view, and why do we continue to favour them for the year ahead?

Disruption

We think commodities tend to do well in three environments.

In a reflationary environment, economic growth is rebounding from a slowdown and consumers and corporations restock depleted inventories, generating steadily rising demand for commodities.

An inflationary environmentor, more precisely, an unexpected spike in inflationis largely caused by rapidly rising commodity prices, whether due to an unexpected disruption of supply or an unexpected burst of demand.

Finally, commodity prices often rise in a geopolitically volatile environment. This can be due to conflicts or disputes causing actual supply disruptions, and subsequent spikes in inflation, particularly if those tensions erupt in key production or transit areas for critical commodities like oil. But consumers often start paying a premium to secure supply even at the mere fear of disruptionand gold often benefits as a perceived catch-all tail-risk hedge.

A supportive backdrop

In 2021, the reflationary escape from the pandemic steered our view. In 2022, we upgraded our view to the highest overweight, anticipating reflationary forces becoming inflationary: An unexpected burst of demand fueled by fiscal stimulus packages ran up against the constraints of disrupted supply chains; and Russia’s assault on Ukraine made the geopolitical environment much more volatile.

Last year could have seen geopolitics stabilize around a stalemate in Ukraine, and rapidly rising interest rates trigger a disinflationary economic slowdown. That is largely why we shifted to a neutral view over the second half of 2023. Instead, economic activity moderated but proved much more resilient than many had expected, and the Hamas attack on Israel added a second major geopolitical flashpoint in a commodity-rich location.

The result is that 2024 looks set to be another year of reflation and geopolitical uncertaintywith the latter significantly raising the tail risk of a return to problematic inflation. In our view, that’s a supportive backdrop for commodities, as both a core exposure to economic growth and a hedge against inflation surprises.

Reflation

The asset class has certainly been making headlines. Crude oil and gold are up 18% and 16%, respectively, since the start of the year. Unprecedented deficits in the cocoa market, caused by poor weather and crop hoarding, have seen prices in this commodity run up by 140% so far this year.

Our base scenario is reflationary: sticky inflation and a global economic recovery leading to relatively high nominal growth. This could be positive for both equities and commodities.

The last three weeks have given us another blow-out U.S. payrolls report, the third hot U.S. inflation release in a row, exceptionally strong U.S. retail sales, and the latest in a series of upgrades to the International Monetary Fund’s global growth forecasts. Even China, a persistent laggard since the pandemic, has managed to stimulate forecast-beating first-quarter growth of 5.3%. The 2023 manufacturing recession appears to be behind us, and Europe, in particular, has begun to restock after running down its commodity inventories.

We think this backdrop favours energy and industrial metals.

Typically, oil demand grows at about half the rate of the global economy. Inventories have been drawn down at a faster-than-normal pace over the past six monthsand given current outlooks for expansion, we think demand could increase by around 1.55 million barrels per day this year. Given OPEC’s cautious production approach, and little prospect of U.S. shale oil stepping into the breach, it could be a significant challenge to meet this demand.

Structural demand for copper and other industrial metals is already strong, in our view, as they are critical for the electrification and decarbonization of the economy, as well as for the build-out of 5G and datacenter infrastructure. The turn in manufacturing adds a cyclical impetus, and these commodities have also tended to benefit the most from non-recessionary rate cuts.

Risks

Among the risks to this reflationary scenario, the two we consider most likely would be supportive of commodities, in our view.

The first is geopolitical volatility. The recent escalation of Israel-Iran tensions highlights the vulnerability of Iranian oil and the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz. Although a complete closure by Iran is improbable, due to Oman’s control over the shipping lanes, we see heightened risk to oil infrastructure and supply routes from proxy actions.

The war in Ukraine still poses threats, too. Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries are causing significant disruption, and Russian export facilities are also at risk. There are also new sanctions on Russian-produced metals to contend with.

Meanwhile, beyond the front-page geopolitical risks, more localized political risks can also cause outsized disruption. Take the Cobre copper mine in Panama, for example. Its owner, Canada’s First Quantum, has been forced to close it following public opposition and a ruling from the country’s Supreme Court that the terms of its contract were unconstitutional. This could remove as much as 2% from global copper supplies, which were already looking constrained due to large cost and production cuts from Anglo American.

The second risk is a return of problematic inflationor the related risk of systemic volatility caused by debt-sustainability concerns or a loss of confidence in fiat currencies. Along with the deteriorating situation in the Middle East, this appears to be the main driver of the 2024 gold and silver rally. We see precious metals not only as beneficiaries of the structural decarbonization trend, but as hedges against the potential for the reflationary cycle to become uncomfortably hot.

Unique backdrop for outperformance

We believe the backdrop of sticky-but-declining inflation and high nominal growth is largely positive for risky assets, but that full valuations in some parts of the market, together with inflation and geopolitical tail risks, support a broad and balanced exposure.

That creates a meaningful role for commodities in a portfolio, in our view. Thanks largely to the diversity within the asset class and its unique supply-and-demand dynamics, we believe it is one of the few investments that stand to benefit from our base scenario for 2024 while also having the potential to outperform significantly should tail risks to that scenario be realized.

 

Erik L. Knutzen, CFA, CAIA and Managing Director, is Co-Head of the Neuberger Berman Quantitative and Multi-Asset investment team and Multi-Asset Chief Investment Officer, and Hakan Kaya, PhD, is a Senior Portfolio Manager. Neuberger Berman is a sponsor of Firstlinks. This information discusses general market activity, industry, or sector trends, or other broad-based economic, market or political conditions and should not be construed as research or investment advice. It is not intended to be an offer or the solicitation of an offer.

For more articles and papers from Neuberger Berman, click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Not all private markets are ‘volatility laundering’

Asset Class Gameboard shows all good things must end

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.