Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 306

Why extra super contributions tax may catch you too

Many people disregard the extra 15% tax Labor wants to impose on super contributions for those who earn more than $200,000 a year (reduced from the current $250,000). They think it does not apply to them because their salary is nowhere near this amount. But it’s not just about salary. It includes much more.

Division 293 tax is broader than most people think

Labor's plan is to reduce the income threshold to $200,000 where the additional contributions tax (Division 293 tax) applies. Division 293 tax is an additional 15% tax on taxable super contributions for people whose combined income and contributions exceed $250,000 a year.

Taxable contributions are concessional (pre-tax) contributions which are employer contributions, including compulsory super and salary-sacrifice contributions, and personal contributions for which a tax deduction is claimed.

It does not apply to non-concessional (after-tax) contributions.

Income for Division 293 tax purposes includes your taxable income (assessable income less allowable deductions), reportable fringe benefits, net investment losses and rental property losses (i.e. negative gearing losses) and any amount on which family trust distribution tax is paid.

What people fail to take into account, though, is that assessable income also includes investment earnings, assessable capital gains (say from the sale of an investment property or parcel of shares they’ve inherited), payments on termination of employment and franking credits on dividend income.

This income together with their concessional contributions (including compulsory super) may push them over the threshold in a year and expose them to additional tax they didn’t expect.

How the calculation works

Take Ron whose salary package including superannuation is $150,000 a year – i.e. $136,986 cash salary and compulsory super of $13,014. Ron makes a personal deductible contribution of $11,986 to take him up to the concessional contributions cap of $25,000.

His income for Division 293 tax purposes comprises net salary of $125,000 ($136,986 minus $11,986), interest income of $5,000, an $80,000 capital gain from the sale of a rental property during the year and a rental loss of $15,000 before the sale of that property. Accordingly, his income ($225,000) and taxable super contributions ($25,000) combined is $250,000 and he doesn’t pay additional contributions tax.

(That's not a typo: the rental loss is also added on for the Division 293 calculation).

However, if Ron earns $1 more, he will pay the usual 45¢ in income tax plus 2¢ in Medicare levy. Plus now he will also pay 15% extra in Division 293 tax because this tax is paid on his taxable super contributions that take his income over the $250,000 threshold. This is effectively 62% tax on that one dollar of extra income. Ron keeps just 38¢ of what he’s just earned.

And if Ron doesn’t have private health insurance then there’s another 1.5¢ Medicare Levy Surcharge, making it 63.5% tax, eroding even further what he takes home. This is the case for up to $25,000 of income from $250,000 to $275,000.

Ron may be able to avoid this tax as it comes down to the source of his income. If all his income came from employment, there’s little he can do. However, as he’s got investment income, he could consider moving his investments into tax structures where earnings aren’t derived in his name, such as super or an investment bond.

Dropping the threshold to $200,000 a year will obviously capture more people in this tax net. In Ron’s case, he would face a $3,750 Division 293 tax bill.

 

Colin Lewis is Head of Strategic Advice at Fitzpatricks Private Wealth. A version of this article appeared in The Australian Financial Review. The article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   15 May 2019
  • 3
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

Reforming the taxation of wealth and wealth transfers

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.