Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 105

Other articles on ‘wealth disruption’

In response to the two articles in Cuffelinks (Part 1 here and Part 2 here) on disruption in wealth management, readers provided some follow up articles on related subjects.

Why Paying for Financial Advice Makes Sense, New York Times, 3 April 2015

This article tells the story of LearnVest, a company established in the US in 2009 to bring financial planning to the masses. After spending US$75 million of venture capital money, it has less than 10,000 clients in its standard plan at $299 upfront and $19 a month. Sobering numbers for any fintech looking to engage with a large, untapped market. LearnVest has effectively capitulated by selling to a large insurance company, Northwestern Mutual.

Investing’s Old Guard Gets Its Algorithm On, Bloomberg Business, 20 March 2015

This article quotes an investor from Houston who pulled all his money out of the market in 2008 only to miss the gains as the market recovered to 2013. “I just need protection from myself” he says as a reason to let others make investment decisions for him. He did not like the high fees of traditional advisers, so turned to roboadvice. It then outlines the move by the US$3 trillion ‘behemoth’ Vanguard and the US$2.5 trillion Charles Schwab into this space.

Digging into Digital Advice White Paper, Fidelity Investments, 28 November 2014

This US White Paper focusses in particular on the propensity of Gen-X and Gen-Y to work with a ‘digital adviser’, and among affluent members of these groups, 29% are already familiar with digital advisers, and 7% use one. The potential benefits are lower fees for advice, ease of doing business, low asset requirements and online access to do-it-yourself tools. 46% of those surveyed believe professional financial advice is too expensive, and so digital is probably tapping into an audience that would not otherwise see an adviser.

The Paper also includes details on pricing levels (as low as 15bp), size of 15 largest online advisers ($4.3 billion in September 2014) and total number of providers (estimated at about 50). But it’s not only for new players. Fidelity offers views on how existing planners can evolve their practice. One message: “Be online, or risk being irrelevant.”

Robo-Advisor White Paper, Equity Institutional, 2014

This paper provides financial advisers with six ways to benefit from “the coming boom in robo-advice assets”. It distinguishes three categories of clients: delegators (“Do what you think is best with my money”), validators (who participate in decision-making) and self-directeds (who want to do it themselves). The writers say 72% of investors want some level of financial advice with their investment decisions. They reassure traditional advisers by arguing that the roboadvice experience is like a calculator with better graphics, often cold and generic and lacking the human element that is essential to good advice. It also has an impressive list of further reading.

 

Graham Hand is Editor of Cuffelinks. This article does not address the personal needs of any individual, nor is it responsible for the accuracy of the content in any referenced material.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The upside of fintech for wealth managers

Will millennials change the investment landscape?

A robo response: digital wealth advice will engage at all levels

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.