Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 392

Australian banks prove resilient but risks remain

  •   KPMG
  •   1 January 2021
  • 1
  •      
  •   

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Australian major banks (the Majors) significantly increased their loan loss provisions and allowed customers to defer loan repayments, but to date their actual loss experience has been minimal.

The open question is to what extent loan losses will materialise in 2021, as the Government unwinds its economic support measures.

Key highlights

The Majors reported a cash profit after tax from continuing operations of $17.4 billion in FY20, down 36.6% on FY19. The profit fall was a function of a number of factors, including some large, notable items like restructuring costs associated with divestments as well as ongoing regulatory and remediation costs. It was also negatively impacted by rising loan impairment charges and credit provisions, in advance of an expected deterioration in the economy as Government support comes to an end.

The average net interest margin (cash basis) saw continued compression, decreasing 5 basis points compared to FY19. Declining net interest margin (NIM) was driven by repricing of deposits, mortgages and business lending assets amidst RBA rate cuts and increased competition in the market. Excess liquidity from an inflow of deposits also hurt margins. However, the Majors benefited from favourable wholesale funding pricing in the second half of the year.

Cost-to-income ratios have increased from an average 47.2% to 53.2%, in large part driven by rising IT related expenses which included higher costs associated with mobilising their workforces for remote working conditions and higher software amortisation charges. In addition, one of the Majors reported significant items relating to regulatory matters.

Excluding these, average cost to income ratio increased by 177 basis points to 45.2%, with increases reported for each Major.

Aggregated loan impairment expenses increased by 201% to $11.2 billion, coming off a historically low provision base at the end of FY19. This increase reflects the Majors expecting higher loan losses and customer defaults as a result of the pandemic, and continued uncertainty in the economic outlook. As a result, total provisions increased to $24.8 billion, providing a significant buffer for potential future losses.

While the actual loss experience has been modest to date, a big question for FY21 is to what extent loan losses will materialise as the Commonwealth government unwinds its economic support measures.

Financial performance and Tier 1 capital 

The Majors have maintained a strong Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio capital position of 11.4%, increasing 59 basis points from FY19. This result has been driven by prudent capital management, and decisions to reduce dividends in line with current APRA guidance, which saw the dividend payout ratio reducing to 52.7% from 81.3%. Westpac and NAB additionally reported a $2.8 billion and $3.5 billion capital raising respectively earlier in the year. While regulators have provided guidance to the banks that in current conditions it would be acceptable to temporarily reduce their capital ratios, it appears that the Majors have preferred the safety of strong balance sheets heading into an uncertain FY21.

The focus on balance sheet strength and reduced profitability has continued to impact returns on equity (ROE), which decreased 458 basis points on the prior comparative period to an average of 6.7%. As the Majors continue to focus on supporting customers, investing in the necessary transformation and maintaining strong balance sheets, shareholder value creation will be an important challenge in upcoming years.

The ‘resilience’ in bank balance sheets

Whilst Australia has fared favourably compared to other developed economies, the impacts are still pronounced and are reflected in the Majors’ FY20 results.

The Majors offered temporary loan repayment deferrals to mortgage and SME lending customers, since the onset of COVID-19 in Australia. Large numbers of borrowers, representing significant loan volumes, have taken up these offers. Due to government support measures (especially the JobKeeper and JobSeeker payments), the Majors have seen the number of borrowers on deferral arrangements come down from their initial levels. 

Against this trend, provisioning levels have continued to increase as the economic outlook becomes clearer. Loan loss models built upon historical loss experiences have proven inadequate in the face of current levels of uncertainty, resulting in the Majors applying increased judgement in estimating their credit loss provisions (including significant management overlays).

It should be noted the Majors’ loan provisions are still well below those seen in many other countries. There is an expectation that Australia may avoid a loan loss fallout compared to what could be experienced in other countries, given our economic outlook, greater success in managing the spread of the virus and lower risk portfolios which have favoured secured residential lending.

Despite the sharp decline in profitability, the Majors have continued to strengthen their balance sheets and maintain substantial capital buffers to position themselves for any potential future shocks. Capital levels are at record levels and their capital ratios continue to be in excess of APRA’s requirements despite regulatory guidance to temporarily relax ‘unquestionably strong’ targets where needed to continue lending to customers.

Diagram 2: CET1 buffer

Source: KPMG analysis from ANZ, CBA, NAB, WBC annual reports.

Investors have borne the brunt of lower ROEs and the Majors' decisions to reduce payout ratios to below their pre-COVID levels in line with current APRA guidance. It remains to be seen when higher payouts will be restored, as the Majors continue to focus on maintaining financial and operational resilience.

The search for new efficiencies

Aggregated operating income declined 1.7% in FY20 to $79.3 billion, reflecting the slowdown in lending and continued downward pressure on interest margins. At the same time, costs have continued to increase as a result of operational resilience measures, customer remediation expenses and regulatory costs. The outcome is that cost-to-income ratios inclusive of significant items for most Majors have now climbed above 50%. 

The Majors are challenged to find earnings growth to aid their recovery. One area where increasing activity has been observed is in partnering with and acquisitions of Fintechs to help them more quickly digitise processes, launch new products and services and build new business models. Recent examples have included the CBA-Klarna and Westpac-Afterpay tie-ups.

Outlook

On a global level, whilst significant uncertainty still exists with key economies where cases of the virus are still prevalent or increasing, financial markets have been able to withstand the initial liquidity challenges of the crisis. In Australia, the Majors have held substantially higher levels of capital and liquid assets compared to prior crises which has positioned them well to absorb significant shocks.

The cash rate and interest rate charged under the Term Funding Facility (TFF) programme is now only 10 basis points (0.10%). This, coupled with the estimated $100 billion quantitative easing programme announced, eases the pathway to recovery with the Majors benefiting from cheap funding sources.

Much of the initial government’s and banks’ response to the crisis has focused on preserving liquidity and their attention is now shifting to the solvency of borrowers as support measures (such as JobKeeper and JobSeeker) and loan repayment deferrals (in some cases extending out to March 2021) come to an end.

It will be important for the Majors to continue monitoring the loan deferral situation and in particular providing support for customers in hardship situations. Whilst a number of these customers may become delinquent at the end of the relief period, the Majors have significant buffers to absorb potential losses.

 

The following KPMG staff have made a significant contribution to the development of the full report: Danny Pang, Matthew Newell, Jonathan Tan, Hugh McMicking, Sharmani Krishnan, Nadira Dantan, Eileen Li, Shruti Hegde, Tony Kong. A copy of the full report is available here. See the report for full disclaimers. This summary is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any person. 

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Bank reporting season scorecard May 2021

Bank scorecard 2020: when will the mojo return?

Bank reporting season scorecard May 2020

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.