Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 532

Australians unprepared for $3.5 trillion wealth transfer

A new report suggests that Australians, both young and old, are ill prepared for the largest wealth transfer in history.

It’s expected that about $100 trillion in assets world-wide will be transferred from Baby Boomers to their children over the next two decades. A 2021 Productivity Commission report estimated that around $3.5 trillion in assets will be transferred in Australia alone by 2050.

The inherited assets will mostly come in the form of superannuation and residential property. Inherited assets are predicted to rise from the current $120 billion per annum to $500 billion per annum over the next 25 years.

A recent report from stock trading firm, AUSIEX, found that the wealth transfer is likely to happen sooner than expected. It suggests Baby Boomers are leaving the workforce at an accelerated pace and they’ll be all but gone from workplaces by 2028:

“It doesn’t stop there. In 2027, the first of the baby boomers will reach their statistical age of death (81 years for men and 85 years for women).

Baby boomer superannuation balances will start to deflate out of the system through retirement consumption and then through disbursement via the inheritance process.”

Nest egg mentality

A new report from Fidelity International called Rainbow’s End suggests most Australians want to share their wealth with the next generation but are unsure how to transfer that wealth. Fidelity surveyed 1,500 people over the age of 26, spanning Gen Y, Gen X, Baby Boomers, and the Silent Generation.

The report found about 50% of people are only somewhat confident or not confident at all in knowing how their wealth transfer goals will be met. Part of the issue is that most of those surveyed aren’t confident that their retirement savings will be enough to support their desired lifestyle. And most also admit they have a so-called nest egg mentality – that is, they want to avoid spending money, so they won’t run out of savings or not have enough to pass on to their family.

Passing on assets now or later?

However, around two in five people prefer that their wealth be shared while they’re alive. That’s almost double the number who’d like to leave their wealth as a bequest.

Interestingly, though, while most of the survey respondents want to transfer assets while they’re alive, they want to leave the majority of transferred assets for when they pass away. The report found that two in three people are likely to transfer 60% or more of their assets after they die.

As one survey respondent, a male baby boomer, remarked:

“I think not giving away too much, too soon. And also trying to keep my children motivated towards their own self-achievement goals and not falling into the thinking of they can always rely on me.”

As for what people want to achieve when transferring assets, the top two goals of those surveyed are to help their children with financial security and express their gratitude and love for them.


Source: Fidelity International

The challenges with transferring wealth

Those surveyed in the report highlighted several key challenges in leaving a bequest or transferring assets while they’re alive:

  • Financial worries: having enough money to leave due to worries about the rising cost of living, insufficient savings, and the impact of taxes and fees.
  • Managing family issues: potential conflicts over the inheritance, disagreements over the distribution of the assets, differing expectations and interpretations of a will, and the possibility of rifts developing in the family.
  • Legal and administrative issues: ensuring the validity of the will, finding a trustworthy executor or trustee, and understanding tax implications.
  • Ensuring wishes are upheld: choosing the right person to receive the bequest, ensuring responsible use of the assets, and avoiding misuse or wastefulness.
  • Uncertainty and lack of knowledge: uncertainty about how to proceed, unfamiliarity with legal requirements, and a lack of information or guidance.



Source: Fidelity International

One of the more fascinating aspects of the survey is what children are expected to do with the money from their parents. One in three think it will used to pay down existing debts. One in four believe it will be spent to maintain the children’s desired lifestyle, while 16% expect it to go towards education.

Financial and estate planning advice

The upcoming wealth transfer has financial advisors licking their lips, and this report will leave them even more optimistic.

The report found that while most people aspire to transfer their wealth, far fewer have made concrete plans to do it. Nearly two in three intending to leave a bequest have a will, yet less than 10% have a comprehensive estate plan.

As for the popular source of advice for those receiving assets or an inheritance, a professional financial adviser tops the list, followed by self-reliance, and family.


Source: Fidelity International

The problem is that there may not be enough financial advisers to handle the increased demand for their services. There are now less than 16,000 advisers, down from almost 28,000 in 2018, before the Hayne Royal Commission.

Given the stringent education requirements to become an adviser, increasing those numbers won’t happen quickly. And superannuation funds being able to provide advice is unlikely to help much given most people require customised guidance for their personal circumstances.

A limited supply of advisers and growing demand can only mean one thing: prices will have to rise from current levels. With ongoing financial advice fees averaging close to $5,000 and out of reach for most people, it’s clear that industry change is needed. And fast.

 

James Gruber is an assistant editor at Firstlinks and Morningstar.com.au

 

16 Comments
Ando
November 06, 2023

Excluding the wealthiest families , any inheritance is going to be straight off the mortgage then down to the car dealership if it allows.
Planners won’t retain much Funds under management after what we have got ourselves into with mortgage rates, school fees, property prices and cost of living.

Aaron Kaufman
October 30, 2023

I think an inheritance has become an expectation in many sectors of society rather than the unexpected windfall it probably should be.
That said, I'm inclined to agree that by the time the majority of Boomer's pass, most of their wealth will have been consumed by their own care, accommodation, funding their lifestyles and so on, especially once inflation, taxes and so on take their bite. After all the whole point of superannuation is to fund ones retirement, not leave the kids a nest egg.
I don't think this transfer of wealth will prove to be any greater than any other intergenerational wealth transfer throughout the ages. Boomer's wealth is perceived not actual and as time goes on and the rules change, that wealth will erode, just the same as cash sitting in a bank account loses its value.

John
October 29, 2023

Rob comment (Oct 26th) assumes I am against people funding more of their aged care -- I am not. I sent my comment to this thread to point out that the intergenerational wealth is not going to be as big as people think. The other thing that Rob is not aware of is that very wealthy people go to nursing homes in this state (WA) that have RAD's over $700,000 and do not depend on the taxpayer i.e., they have no pension, and they have also means test associated payment daily living costs. The poor have nothing to pay. So, it is the middle classes that pick up the burden ie big RAD and other costs relative to their assets. Meanwhile they during their working life do the heavy lifting with personal tax. They will require bigger nest egg super to fund their aged care but now if this is greater than 3 million they get taxed the same way as someone with a 100 million super!

Roewen Wishart
November 09, 2023

I don't doubt John's calculations, but importantly in most cases, the very large majority of the Refundable Accomodation Deposit is....refunded (to the deceased person's estate, or to the person if they leave to live elsewhere). Of course, there's the opportunity cost incurred by earning no return on the RAD amount while it's held by the aged care provider. And John's point about daily contributions is separate (they are not refundable).

shooter
October 29, 2023

My biggest worry is our hard earned and accumulated assets be subject to family law split when passing on to our kids.

Don
October 29, 2023

We have decided to top up our children's ( in their mid 30s) and their spouses' superannuation each year to the max deductible. This at least transfers funds into long term tax effective holdings that can't be spent now.
Combined with legal loan documentation around any internal home loan assistance and Testimentary Trust based wills, we feel comfortable the balance of help V spoiling is as good as we can make it.
Clear communication and open exchange is our basis. All our kids see all our finances each year.

john
October 29, 2023

That is a good idea re holdings that can't be spent now because I have seen children waste it on junk, like from china etc.
However what about spousal split ?
What about those contributions preventing access to an eventual govt pension (but you may be rich enough not to have that as an issue).

shooter
October 30, 2023

I have the same question as John's. What have you done to protect the assets from spousal split, or you don't mind?

john
November 04, 2023

No answers to our questions as yet ??
Oh well I suppose even if one does leave holdings that cannot be spent now, the children will just buy that junk from China eventually later. Just delayed, so - no win, no win !!

Ricky C
October 27, 2023

After struggling with potential social and family complexities of life my family - mum, dad and ypung adult kids (beneficiaries) collectively agreed a Will bound up in a Discretionary Trust sufficient comfort to acheive our legacy goals.
Involving the next generation, agreeing on the the structure of passing any wealth on and them knowing they had access to the tools when their turn arrives have us all some kind of certainty. How more than What is passed-on has worked for us.

Jovan
October 27, 2023

Everyone is after everyone else's inheritance the biggest grabbers are the governments with their proposed "death tax". They tax us while we are alive and to satisfy their insatiable desire they have to drive the last nail into our cofins with tax. I personally think all politicians should be multiplied by zero.

Eva briggs
October 28, 2023

I tottally agree? everthing is costing us living expenses land rates etc making life very hard rich getting richer and the middle class struggling to make a living 

John
October 26, 2023

This wealth transfer is not going to be as big as everyone thinks. The cost of elderly care at home and nursing homes is massive and will make a big dent in estates. Having placed my mum in a nursing home after looking after her at home for a long time, this has been clear to me for some time. Most of mum's cash etc as gone in home care. Then the RAD took the full value of her home. The government is not able to or willing to fund aged care to the level it should. This responsibility will increasing be passed on to the estate/family. In the future the RAD will not be fully refundable as it is now. Currently the nursing homes are charging interest on the RAD of 8.1% if people do not have the funds to pay the RAD up front. RAD free nursing homes beds are becoming rare, with long waiting lists.

Mike
October 29, 2023

Sounds reasonably fair. The taxpayer pays almost all (96%) of the direct care (nursing and personal care) of older people who reside in an aged care home. The resident uses their own income and assets to pay for most of their everyday living costs (food, laundry, cleaning, power etc.) and their housing. The taxpayer pays a strong safety net for those without much in the way of income and assets. But the majority of aged care homes are running at a loss, so people with higher wealth should be paying more for their every living and accommodation to start offsetting these losses.

Rob
October 26, 2023

The "expectation" of an inheritance has a nasty habit of killing incentive. An "early" inheritance has a nasty habit of being long forgotten!

There is clearly a time but it is a balance - you do not want to run out of money, you do not want to pay Chalmers Death Tax and you do not want to receive postcards from your kids in Hawaii while you shuffle off to Aged Care!

Critically the older generation needs to talk about what is inevitable ie death, to the next generation and you have half a chance to collectively make sensible and productive decisions. For most people, that is way too confronting, much better to have an intra family brawl after you die where the accountants and lawyers win!!

Steve
October 27, 2023

Love it - well don’t Rob

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Super, death and taxes – time to rethink your estate plans?

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.