Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 94

Capital management techniques in LICs

In the last five years, the Australian Listed Investment Company (LIC) sector has grown at a rapid pace to reach a market capitalisation of over $26 billion. The last year alone saw 15 new LIC offerings and total capital raised touching $1.5 billion. LICs continue to be a popular investment choice for investors on the hunt for dividends in an environment where other asset classes have been struggling to provide similar levels of yield.

In October 2014, I wrote an article about why LICs trade at premiums or discounts to net tangible assets (NTA). In the last three years, the overall LIC sector discount to NTA has narrowed significantly, driven by many factors, including the increased popularity of LICs following the introduction of the FOFA (Future of Financial Advice) reforms and the proliferation of SMSFs. There still remains a small part of the sector trading at a discount to their NTAs, and as a result, we have seen the number of capital management initiatives increase compared to previous years.

Two key techniques to narrow the discount

  1. Share buy backs

Share buy backs have had mixed success rates over recent decades. While the technique has worked quickly and effectively for some in narrowing the discount to NTA, it has not been the case for others who have seen their buy back programmes prolonged with no or little narrowing and leading to eventual abandonment of the initiative.

Focusing on more recent times, given the proliferation of LICs in the last few years, uncovers some examples.

Hunter Hall Global Value (ASX: HHV) announced on 27 November 2014 a share buy-back of up to 10% of issued capital. At the date of the announcement, HHV traded at a 9% discount to NTA and had been trading at a discount for the last few years, averaging 16% in the last three years. Five weeks later, the discount to NTA had narrowed to 4%, despite the fact that the company had not started implementing its buy back mechanism. In this case, announcing the buy back on its own seemed to have the desired effect.

Premium Investors (formerly listed on the ASX under the code PRV), a LIC part of the Treasury Group, traded at a discount of 15-25% for many years. It had various buy backs of up to 10% of stock under way over some years, which didn’t narrow the discount to NTA to the Board’s satisfaction. In August 2012, it announced a buy back of up to 75% of stock, citing the discount to NTA over a prolonged period as the main driver. This particular LIC was sub-scale with around $86 million of funds under management and had a sporadic history of paying dividends. WAM Capital Limited merged with Premium Investors on a NTA for NTA basis in December 2012.

  1. Dividend policies

Newer but more established LICs trading at a discount to NTA have been providing shareholders with a formal dividend policy and more forward-looking dividend payment information.

In October 2012, two LICs which are part of Perth-based financial services group Euroz Limited, Westoz Investment Company (ASX: WIC) and Ozgrowth Limited (ASX: OZG), announced the payout of a minimum of 50% of realised profits each year and provided dividend guidance for the following two years. Before the announcement, Westoz was trading at a discount to NTA of 36% and Ozgrowth at 34%. This compares to a much narrower discount at the time of writing of 2% at Westoz and 4% at Ozgrowth.

As mentioned, one of the key drivers of the proliferation of the LIC sector is the chase for fully franked dividends and LICs are now becoming more open in providing dividend policies and guidance, which in my opinion will help narrow the discount to NTA.

Funds may liquidate if discounts persist

In the past decade in Australia, we have seen various LICs either wind up or be taken over in M&A transactions, where the discount to NTA has persisted over protracted time periods. The largest incidence of note was Ellerston GEMS Fund which listed in July 2007. It had a proven track record, a strong investment team, a flexible mandate and raised $600 million in the listing. Just over a year later, and despite a strong outperformance of the fund versus the market during the GFC, the discount to NTA widened to a hefty 24%. The company announced that redemption facilities would be put in place for shareholders to realise NTA over a three-year period and that the LIC would be delisted from the ASX. It delisted in November 2011.

Souls Private Equity Limited was a LIC focused, as the name suggests, on the private equity space. In September 2011, parent company, Soul Pattinson (ASX: SOL), made a takeover bid at NTA for the company, which was trading at a 60% discount to NTA prior to the announcement.

Strong demand for LICs but some discounts persist

Even though we are in a ‘golden decade’ for LICs in Australia, some LICs, particularly the smaller ones, continue to trade at a discount to NTA. More recently issued new LICs which are examples of this include NAOS Emerging Opportunities Company Limited (ASX: NCC), trading at a 12% discount to NTA and Acorn Capital Investment Fund Limited (ASX: ACQ), trading at a 15% discount to NTA at time of writing.

Other factors that we consider to be determinants of trading at a premium or discount to NTA are the liquidity of the stock, the level of marketing by the company or by the contracted investment manager and general levels of shareholder engagement such as direct presentations to shareholders, media exposure and other marketing related activities.

No single method always works

While buy backs have had mixed levels of success in narrowing the discount to NTA, there is no clear evidence that it enhances the share price relative to NTA. In more recent times, some LICs have been providing more dividend guidance and there is evidence to suggest that this has worked for those able to follow this route.

 

Chris Stott is Chief Investment Officer at Wilson Asset Management. His views are general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions. Wilson Asset Management is a major manager of LICs.

RELATED ARTICLES

LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

How can the worst feature of LICs also be the best?

International LICs can have a fully franked future

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 467

Fund manager reports for last financial year are drifting into client mailboxes, and many of the results are disappointing. With some funds giving back their 2021 gains, why did they not reduce their exposure to hot stocks when faced with rising inflation and rates?

  • 21 July 2022

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 466 with weekend update

Heard the word, cakeism? As in, 'having your cake and eating it too'. The Reserve Bank wants to simultaneously fight inflation by taking away spending power, while not driving the economy into a recession. If you want to help, stop buying stuff.

  • 14 July 2022

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 465 with weekend update

Many thanks for the thousands of revealing comments in our survey on retirement experiences. We discuss the full results. And with the ASX200 down 10%, the US S&P500 off 20% and bond prices tanking, each investor faces the new financial year deciding whether to sit, sell or invest more.

  • 7 July 2022

Latest Updates

Financial planning

Five charts show predicaments facing financial advice

The number of financial advisers in Australia has almost halved at a time of greater need than ever. What has happened to the industry and its clients as yet another Quality of Advice Review takes place?

Property

House price doomsayers: Could housing prices really fall by 20%?

Why do house prices move in an up-and-flat pattern rather than up-and-down like shares? When house prices start to fall, supply reduces to create a new equilibrium, rather than needing even more price reductions.

Latest from Morningstar

Why I’m not ready for an SMSF

SMSFs are increasing in popularity among younger investors, drawn by the investment control and fixed costs. But until a sufficient balance is achieved, it may be better to stay with a large fund.

Investment strategies

Six ways to take a ‘private equity’ approach in listed markets

By taking a private equity approach to investing in the public equity markets in this difficult market, investors can harness the 'best of both worlds' and still make superior returns over the long term.

Investment strategies

How to avoid being a bad investor

It's tough to become the 'best' investor in the world, but we can certainly avoid being the 'worst'. Here are graphical examples of some long-term principles to adopt, including the difficulty of timing the market.

Financial planning

The case for closing the financial gender gap

While the gender pay gap is slowly improving in the workplace, ATO data shows Australian men aged 55-59 average $50,000 more in super than women of the same age. Financial advisers have a role to play.

Property

Three opportunities in property in Australia and APAC

Rising interest rates and occupancy threats have reduced the share prices of many property companies and trusts, but the selling underestimates the strong pockets of demand and robust earnings from good tenants.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.