Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 163

CEO letters cut through the white noise

Company annual reports have come to resemble novels in size. In 2013, the average annual report required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was 42,000 words (up from 30,000 in 2000), due in large part to increased regulation and greater input from lawyers and accountants, putting many investors off or off to sleep.

The Wall Street Journal (paywall) recently reported that General Electric’s annual report was downloaded a mere 800 times and only a handful of people called investor relations with questions. Apparently it takes GE roughly two months to compile the report, requiring input from about 200 people, which in 2014 resulted in 103,484 words or 257 pages.

CEOs add a personal touch

While the annual report itself can be intimidating, CEO letters to shareholders can be inspiring and educational. The most famous of these is Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway letter, which is understandable given its exceptional quality. But there are some other great letters, written mainly by CEOs that are also upfront about their business risks and strategy.

In my opinion there is only one letter that comes close to Buffet’s – the one written by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos. He doesn’t do many interviews so his letters are a must read if you want to understand how he thinks about his business. The 2015 letter contained this gem of a paragraph:

“One area where we are especially distinctive is failure. We are the best place in the world to fail [we have plenty of practice!], and failure and invention are inseparable twins. To invent you have to experiment, and if you know in advance that it’s going to work, it’s not an experiment. Most large organisations embrace the idea of invention, but are not willing to fail to get there. Outsized returns often come from betting against conventional wisdom, and conventional wisdom is usually right. Given a 10% chance of a 100-fold payoff, you should take that bet every time. But you’re still going to be wrong nine times out of 10. If you swing for the fences, you’re going to strike out a lot, but you’re also going to hit some home runs. In business, every once in a while, you can score 1,000 runs in one hit. Big winners pay for lots of experiments.”

Amazon’s cloud computing business (AWS) and free-shipping Prime service are the results of this ‘swing for the fences’ innovation. AWS reached $US10 billion in sales faster than any other enterprise software business. He also adds that "We want Prime to be such a good value, you’d be irresponsible not to be a member." It’s quite a statement. His customer-focussed approach remains the same every year, and he attaches a copy of his original letter from 1997 as a reminder that nothing has changed

Another letter I look forward to is from Bobby Kotak, the CEO of Activision Blizzard, the company behind games like Warcraft, Starcraft, and Call of Duty. It might seem strange to recommend a gaming company whose report has lots of pictures, but don’t hold that against them. Kotak is a fan of Buffett. He explains the ups and downs of the business and even compares his company’s performance to Buffett’s. Over the past 25 years, Kotak has grown Activision’s book value per share at the extraordinary rate of 30% annually, beating Berkshire.

Their opportunity is explained simply, gaming has become a sport and they plan to be the ESPN of gaming. In 2015, users spent 14 billion hours playing their games, up 16% year on year. This doesn’t include time spent watching people play games which was 30% more than all major sports leagues on TV combined in the US. In future, they believe they can generate extra revenues through sponsorships and broadcast rights.

Q&A format works well

An honourable mention goes to JP Morgan. Banks are famous for their lengthy disclosures, but its comprehensive question and answer letter format gives readers a better understanding of their business. CEO Jamie Dimon lays out potential business risks and also gives a great overview and insight into the global economy.

The annual report is being increasingly influenced by regulation. Thankfully, the annual letter helps set the tone. If the CEO can explain their strategy in an easy-to-read way and map out their long-term goals they will attract the right shareholders. As Warren Buffet says, “Either hold a rock concert or a ballet but don’t hold a rock concert and advertise it as a ballet.”

 

Jason Sedawie is a Portfolio Manager at Decisive Asset Management, a global growth-focused fund. Disclosure: Decisive’s fund holds Amazon shares. This article is for general purposes only and does not consider the specific needs of any individual.

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.