Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 163

CEO letters cut through the white noise

Company annual reports have come to resemble novels in size. In 2013, the average annual report required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was 42,000 words (up from 30,000 in 2000), due in large part to increased regulation and greater input from lawyers and accountants, putting many investors off or off to sleep.

The Wall Street Journal (paywall) recently reported that General Electric’s annual report was downloaded a mere 800 times and only a handful of people called investor relations with questions. Apparently it takes GE roughly two months to compile the report, requiring input from about 200 people, which in 2014 resulted in 103,484 words or 257 pages.

CEOs add a personal touch

While the annual report itself can be intimidating, CEO letters to shareholders can be inspiring and educational. The most famous of these is Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway letter, which is understandable given its exceptional quality. But there are some other great letters, written mainly by CEOs that are also upfront about their business risks and strategy.

In my opinion there is only one letter that comes close to Buffet’s – the one written by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos. He doesn’t do many interviews so his letters are a must read if you want to understand how he thinks about his business. The 2015 letter contained this gem of a paragraph:

“One area where we are especially distinctive is failure. We are the best place in the world to fail [we have plenty of practice!], and failure and invention are inseparable twins. To invent you have to experiment, and if you know in advance that it’s going to work, it’s not an experiment. Most large organisations embrace the idea of invention, but are not willing to fail to get there. Outsized returns often come from betting against conventional wisdom, and conventional wisdom is usually right. Given a 10% chance of a 100-fold payoff, you should take that bet every time. But you’re still going to be wrong nine times out of 10. If you swing for the fences, you’re going to strike out a lot, but you’re also going to hit some home runs. In business, every once in a while, you can score 1,000 runs in one hit. Big winners pay for lots of experiments.”

Amazon’s cloud computing business (AWS) and free-shipping Prime service are the results of this ‘swing for the fences’ innovation. AWS reached $US10 billion in sales faster than any other enterprise software business. He also adds that "We want Prime to be such a good value, you’d be irresponsible not to be a member." It’s quite a statement. His customer-focussed approach remains the same every year, and he attaches a copy of his original letter from 1997 as a reminder that nothing has changed

Another letter I look forward to is from Bobby Kotak, the CEO of Activision Blizzard, the company behind games like Warcraft, Starcraft, and Call of Duty. It might seem strange to recommend a gaming company whose report has lots of pictures, but don’t hold that against them. Kotak is a fan of Buffett. He explains the ups and downs of the business and even compares his company’s performance to Buffett’s. Over the past 25 years, Kotak has grown Activision’s book value per share at the extraordinary rate of 30% annually, beating Berkshire.

Their opportunity is explained simply, gaming has become a sport and they plan to be the ESPN of gaming. In 2015, users spent 14 billion hours playing their games, up 16% year on year. This doesn’t include time spent watching people play games which was 30% more than all major sports leagues on TV combined in the US. In future, they believe they can generate extra revenues through sponsorships and broadcast rights.

Q&A format works well

An honourable mention goes to JP Morgan. Banks are famous for their lengthy disclosures, but its comprehensive question and answer letter format gives readers a better understanding of their business. CEO Jamie Dimon lays out potential business risks and also gives a great overview and insight into the global economy.

The annual report is being increasingly influenced by regulation. Thankfully, the annual letter helps set the tone. If the CEO can explain their strategy in an easy-to-read way and map out their long-term goals they will attract the right shareholders. As Warren Buffet says, “Either hold a rock concert or a ballet but don’t hold a rock concert and advertise it as a ballet.”

 

Jason Sedawie is a Portfolio Manager at Decisive Asset Management, a global growth-focused fund. Disclosure: Decisive’s fund holds Amazon shares. This article is for general purposes only and does not consider the specific needs of any individual.

 

  •   6 July 2016
  • 1
  •      
  •   
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.