Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 276

Changing landscape of US large and mid caps

Historically, an allocation to the US large cap growth category of the equity asset class, as represented by the Russell 1000® Growth Index, has presented investors with a reasonable opportunity to gain exposure to mid cap stocks. For this analysis, we define US mid caps as companies with a market capitalisation between $2 billion and $25 billion1. The advantage of this inefficiency within the asset class is that it may help to diversify a portfolio, at least from a market capitalisation standpoint. However, due primarily to the strong performance of a handful of technology stocks (and their ensuing increase in market capitalisation) within the Russell 1000® Growth Index, today’s large-cap growth investor may be less able to gain mid cap exposure through the traditional large cap growth allocation (as shown in Exhibit 1).

The increasing dominance of large caps

In our view, the dominance of the most influential large cap stocks can be better appreciated when viewed from the perspective of market-capitalisation buckets, as illustrated in Exhibit 2. Exposure to mid cap stocks in the Russell 1000® Growth Index has declined from 39% of that index in 2010 to just 14% as of 31 August 2018. Also worth noting is where this percentage change was reallocated. We have observed a significant increase in stocks with a market capitalisation greater than $300 billion in the index.

This one-dimensional shift in the market cap exposures has added an additional layer of concentration risk where over 30% of the Russell 1000® Growth Index is focused on those companies with a market valuation of over $300 billion.

Exhibit 3 puts it in perspective. In 2010, Facebook was not even a publicly traded company (IPO: May 2012), but it’s currently the sixth-largest company in the index, behind only Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and Berkshire Hathaway.

Dedicated allocation to mid caps

While the market caps for the largest growth companies have accelerated dramatically since mid-2016, outpacing mid caps, how this trend is likely to progress is uncertain. However, an allocation to large cap growth today provides far less exposure to companies further down the capitalisation spectrum. A dedicated allocation to mid cap growth may prove a key component of a comprehensive asset allocation framework moving forward.

In any market environment, we strongly believe that investors should stay diversified across a variety of asset classes. By constructing your portfolio with the awareness of how these weights shift over time, you can help ensure that your portfolio is properly diversified and that your financial strategy supports your long-term goals, time horizon and tolerance for risk. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss.

 

Nick Paul is Institutional Equity Portfolio Manager at MFS Investment Management, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. The views expressed in this commentary are those of the author and are subject to change at any time. These views should not be relied upon as investment advice, as securities recommendations, or as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any investment product.

For more articles and papers from MFS Investment Management, please click here.

 

Endnotes

1 Companies with a market capitalization between $2 billion and $25 billion account for 80% of the constituents in the Russell Midcap® Growth Index, as of 8/31/18.

The Russell 1000 Growth Index® measures US large-cap growth stocks.

The Russell Midcap Growth Index® measures U.S. mid-cap growth stocks. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Frank Russell Company (“Russell”) is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is a trademark of Frank Russell Company. Neither Russell nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the Russell Indexes and/or Russell ratings or underlying data and no party may rely on any Russell Indexes and/ or Russell ratings and/or underlying data contained in this communication. No further distribution of Russell Data is permitted without Russell’s express written consent. Russell does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Best-in-class, ‘pure-play’ companies give clearer focus

We have many world best practice companies

Should you be a value or growth investor?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.