Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 115

Why China’s property market matters

A credit-fuelled property bubble enabled China to maintain its incredible run of growth through the global financial crisis (GFC). However, now China has to deal with a massive excess supply of property that is causing construction activity to contract along with a range of other linked sectors in the Chinese economy, as millions of homes lie vacant.

Background to China’s property bubble

In 2007, China was constructing around 1.5 billion square metres of gross residential floor space per year (or approximately 15 million housing units) to support urbanisation, to replace old housing stock and to meet the investment needs of Chinese households. By 2013, despite a fall in the rate of urbanisation, the construction rate had reached 2 billion square metres, resulting in several million more housing units being constructed each year than new households being formed.

A serious geographic mismatch also developed between housing supply and demand. Although urbanisation generated strong housing demand in Tier 1 and 2 cities, a disproportionate share of property development was concentrated in smaller cities. Subsequently, Tier 1 cities such as Beijing and Shanghai generally suffer from housing shortages, while Tier 3 and 4 cities hold most of the excess supply.

The excess supply problem is compounded by a lack of affordable housing for domestic migrant workers who account for the majority of new urban households. Almost 60% of migrant workers live in company dormitories or on work sites, most of whom cannot afford to buy homes, even if the ‘hukou system’ allowed it. China’s government has directly contributed to the property glut, having built an estimated 46 million low-cost subsidised housing units from 2010-2015.

Moreover, unfavourable demographics are putting downward pressure on property demand. China’s working age population (aged 15-59) peaked in 2012 and is currently declining by several million people each year, while the main property buying demographic, the population aged 25-49, is expected to peak in 2015 and decline thereafter.

Most of China’s excess housing supply is vacant stock held by private investors, with the remainder sitting on the books of real estate developers, many of whom are highly-indebted. According to the China Household Finance Survey, 22% of urban housing in China is vacant.

What does this mean for China?

A build-up of unoccupied properties will ultimately lead to a major contraction of construction and linked sectors in the Chinese economy. Indeed this process is already underway. National house prices have fallen 6% in the past year and urban housing completions are down 13% so far in 2015. Electricity consumption increased by 1% over the year to April 2015, compared to 8% growth per annum in 2012 and 2013. Steel production, cement production and rail freight traffic are slowing significantly while imports are contracting, which may reflect domestic macro weakness.

A property fire sale by investors or developers could lead to large falls in prices and capital losses, rendering many developers insolvent. China’s property industry is highly leveraged, and closely linked to the shadow banking system, creating potential financial system risks. Local governments are increasingly buying land from themselves, via local government financing vehicles (LGFVs), using money borrowed from banks and shadow lenders. Many Chinese households have effectively lent to LGFVs via trusts and wealth management products (WMPs).

Real estate accounts for more than half of household wealth in China. If prices fall dramatically household consumption will follow, and some overleveraged households may be forced to sell. Household debt, around half of which is mortgage-related, has risen strongly from around 8% of GDP in 2000 to around 38% in 2014, but remains relatively low. Interest rate liberalisation, capital account opening, and the availability of alternative investments (e.g. WMPs) could also undermine property market fundamentals.

To work off the excess supply it is possible that China’s residential property construction activity could fall by as much as 50%. Real estate and related industries account for 20-25% of GDP. The housing sector directly represents approximately 10% of GDP (approximately 50% more than the US pre-GFC). The bursting of the property bubble would cause fiscal balances to deteriorate, especially for local governments which rely on land sales for around 35% of revenues. A large contraction in China’s property sector would cause a major slowdown in the economy and perhaps even a recession.

Implications for global markets

China is a key driver of global growth. Since 2010, the country is estimated to have directly contributed around a quarter of global economic growth, despite its economy only representing around 12% of global GDP. China accounts for around half of the world’s consumption of iron ore, cement, coal and steel. Should China’s economy continue to slow the global repercussions are likely to be significant, including:

  • Trade links: countries such as Brazil, Russia, Australia and Canada are vulnerable to a China slowdown and have already experienced material depreciations in their currencies against the US dollar as commodity prices have fallen. These economies may also be exposed to the unwinding of commodities-linked domestic credit booms. Other economies with major trade linkages to China, particularly in Asia and Japan, would also be adversely affected.
  • Financial links: Although relatively nascent, links between Chinese banks and Hong Kong or Singapore could provide channels for the international transmission of a Chinese financial shock. Foreign lending to Chinese corporates has grown at a rapid pace and is focused on the property sector. Chinese property developers currently represent approximately one-third of Asian high yield non-financial corporate bond issuance and could trigger a reassessment of risk premia in the event of large scale defaults. If China experiences a recession and defaults spread across borders, an emerging markets credit crunch is not out of the question.
  • Capital repatriation: Property markets in Canada, Australia, the UK and Hong Kong could be hit if investors pull out of international assets. China also has massive foreign exchange reserves and is one of the world’s largest holders of US Treasury securities.

Fortunately, the Chinese authorities appear to be taking steps to manage the housing market correction and slow credit growth. Furthermore, almost all of China’s debt is held domestically, which makes it easier for the government to manage large-scale defaults as it did in the late 1990s. With government debt at 56% of GDP, China has room for additional fiscal stimulus and debt nationalisation. The country’s huge foreign exchange reserves and current account surplus also make it highly resilient. However, if the returns on incremental spending and investment are sufficiently low the government may not be able to prevent a sharp slowdown or a recession.

While there are a number of reasons to be optimistic about China’s long-term economic future, the short-to-medium term challenges are considerable. China’s property bubble is set to burst and the economic ramifications will be widespread, warranting a cautious approach by investors.

 

Sam Churchill is the Head of Macro Research at Magellan Asset Management. This material has been prepared by Magellan Asset Management Limited for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice. It does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs.

 

2 Comments
Adam Furlonger
August 11, 2015

It is important to remember that while China’s leadership is getting comfortable bedding in expectations of a “new normal” of slower growth for the economy, they still hope it is business as usual for the pivotal real estate market.

But as expectations of subdued or declining property prices also become part of the new economic reality, Chinese households have been spurning real estate as an investment asset.

This has left developers with a problem — mounting piles of unsold property inventory and rising debt loads.

Policy makers face a challenge to ensure China is not heading into a new period of sliding prices and a spiral of debt deflation.

According to recently released figures from the National Bureau of Statistics, the ratio of unsold property to annual sales reached 51.5% in 2014, up from 24.7% in 2011.

In the first two months of this year home sales by area fell 17.8% year-on-year and 16.7% in value terms, meaning the oversupply situation is getting worse....not better.

This backlog of supply is expected to remain an overhang at least into 2017-2018 & possibly beyond.

This situation is likely to renew investors’ edginess on China’s outlook given the critical importance of property to the overall economy.

The property sector directly accounts for 25% of growth in GDP and significantly more if raw materials and related refurbishment demand is included.

Even more worryingly Property is estimated to be collateral for around half of all Chinese banks’ lending, according to many experts.

In other words it looks like everyone from Chinese Investors to Chinese Banks are currently learning what the rest of the world discovered during the GFC.....anything that goes up most certainly can come down.

Adam Furlonger

Paul Meleng
June 25, 2015

Very useful article. I find it worth remembering that the key practical difference between a private land system and "communist" is that part of the revolution is reverting ownership of all land to "the people" via the state. When that state then decides to embrace western capital enterprise it has a big asset at its disposal , being the land itself, along with every State enterprise and monopoly. The power then sits with whatever authority is responsible for that land or that service asset or resource.. A huge amount of the private wealth generated in such a change is at heart driven by whoever manages to pick up the fruits of the largesse of privatisation. (witness the overnight creation of the oligarchs of the old USSR) . The graft incentive is even greater and the unearned profits even greater than in our own land development rezoning backscratching game.
Given that our own economy is grossly distorted by that process and yet we have been free enterprise for many generations and that our economists and punters and legislators still get caught and surprised by the bursting of bubbles I wonder why people assume that the players in China would be any better at managing the forces at work. Especially when it has never happened this way before in history in such a framework and certainly never on this scale . Lets face it. Anything is possible.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

China’s growth slowdown is underway

China’s new model is a plan for a hostile world

Five trends shaping investments in China: 2021 and beyond

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.