Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 409

China’s new model is a plan for a hostile world

Sir Arthur Lewis (1915-1991) was an economist from Saint Lucia in the Caribbean who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1979 for his theories on development. His ‘dual sector model’ suggested that economies can modernise without triggering inflation because the growing industrial sector can rely on a large supply of farm workers to work for low, but not subsistence, wages. This allows industry to earn, then reinvest, excessive profits. But one day the stream of peasants dries up. When a developing economy reaches this ‘Lewis turning point’, wages growth exceeds productivity, industrial profits decline, investment drops and inflation stirs.

Major changes approaching for China

A big challenge for China is that the country is approaching a Lewis turning point at the same time it faces a ‘demographic time bomb’, a term that describes the rapid ageing of its 1.4 billion population. Another test is that China is confronting the ‘middle-income trap’. This is a term for when a country’s initial and successful drive to industrialise becomes bogged at middle-income levels unless the country can develop the skilled workforces, sophisticated manufacturing, financial sectors, institutions, governance standards and rule of law that advanced countries possess.

On top of these challenges, another has emerged for Beijing, along with an opportunity. China’s growing political and economic clout has created a hostile global environment but a relatively weaker US.

China’s policymakers have long seen the first two challenges coming. Along with some institutional reform, their answer was to make domestic demand a bigger driver of economic growth. But the pivotal market reforms of the past 15 years to rebalance the economy away from exports and investment appears too inadequate a solution for Chinese leaders in a harsher world but one where it senses the US is vulnerable.

Beijing’s response to help double the economy’s size from 2020 to 2035 and to ensure its global influence? A 'dual circulation' strategy, which marries the ‘external circulation’ of global demand with the ‘internal circulation’ of domestic demand.

The split-economy strategy emerged from a Politburo meeting in May 2020 and appears deliberately ambiguous. Official pronouncements since indicate the plan aims to reduce China’s reliance on other countries for national-security reasons while boosting the country’s ‘soft’ global power to approach (thus nullify) that of the US. While the previous rebalancing aimed to lessen China’s dependence on exports, the dual-circulation strategy seeks to limit China’s reliance on imports and the US-dominated global financial and trading system.

The strategy’s essence is prioritising domestic production, innovation and self-sufficiency. It is a call to turn China into a sophisticated manufacturing hub, form China-centric global production networks that multinationals come to rely on, develop a yuan-based international financial network, and possibly turn China into a military-technological complex. The means to these goals include subsidies, export controls, data restrictions and dangling China’s consumer market as an enticement to attract foreign capital and technology.

Source: World Bank Open Data

A challenge for other countries including Australia

Just as important is what Beijing’s dual-circulation strategy does not do. The policy lacks any unleashing of market forces. It is not a retreat into North Korean-style autarky. The strategy heralds no easing of the Communist Party’s political control. Nor is it a plan to break the international order.

The dual-circulation strategy, in many ways, might seem a partial shift. But it is poised to drive China’s economy, boost its regional hegemony, make China a leader in industrial, technological and financial spheres, and advance China’s global influence. The strategy is likely to challenge some of the countries and industries dependent on China as an export destination and offer a fresh competitor to industrial powerhouses such as Germany that export capital goods. It foretells of renewed pushes to internationalise China’s financial system and promote the use of the yuan to rival the US-dollar-based global financial network.

The plan signals more significant trade agreements rather than any drive to liberalise world trade. It flags further Chinese efforts to dominate global bodies so it can influence the rules-based global order and set global technology standards. It likely means an intensification of the clash with the US to dominate the technologies of tomorrow. China’s dual-circulation strategy signals that an era approaches when international linkages are more an overt means to enhance global power rather than a cooperative way to boost economic efficiency.

Source: World Bank Open Data

To be sure, China’s new strategy might not be that noticeable over time and Beijing’s reluctance to provide details means it could morph into anything. It’s too early to emphatically rebut those who dismiss it as just the old rebalancing strategy. Same goes for responding to those who say it’s just an extension of the Made in China 2025 drive for technological leadership and the Belt and Road Initiative. There are major developments that don’t sit easily within the strategy. Beijing’s aggression in the South China Sea, crackdown on Hong Kong, intimidation of Taiwan and ‘wolf warrior’ diplomacy risk a backlash that would nullify any advancements in soft power. The dual-circulation strategy might come with a larger-than-expected cost to efficiency. The strategy relies on a certain level of foreign participation and human-rights abuses might deter some western companies.


Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

The next step in China's global power move

But if developments ‘follow the money’ as they often do, China’s supersized economy will be enough of a magnet to tie much of the world to China. There’s every chance Beijing will engineer a partial decoupling from the US-led world on its own terms. Such a separation would form the next phase of China’s modernisation, the next leap in its global power, perhaps even the next ‘China shock’, where China’s industrialisation so far formed the first shock.

 

Michael Collins is an Investment Specialist at Magellan Asset Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only, not investment advice. For the full version of this article and to view sources, go to: https://www.magellangroup.com.au/insights/.

For more articles and papers from Magellan, please click here.

 

11 Comments
Denial
June 01, 2021

Given the abject failure of the Belt and Roads infrastructure investments to date (all projects drowning in debt) and the increasing use of autocratic rule from the CCP is also thought to be a sign that that the masses aren't as congruent as we're lead to believe. The descent shown post COVID to "citizen supervisors" following the deaths of their relatives is a case in point that human nature doesn't work like the CCP want it to. Will the Chinese authorities now move from One Child to negatively incentivising families to the just announced Three Child policy given "time bomb" you noted?

Ken
June 03, 2021

Unfortunately, it is always China that is the bad boy. The western press forgets the wars and killings America has been waging since world war2 on anybody that dares question its policies. They have destroyed a greater part of the muslim middle east, Africa and South America. 

Ruth
June 03, 2021

We know Ken, but the USA has never taken territory from another country; their primary motivation has been to trade. I don't think the CCP thinks that way. The USA is a lot more introspective about their actions now. The USA has not unleashed a disease on every country in the world. It disturbs me that 3rd world countries we had hoped could develop themselves are faced with this setback, missing much needed tourist dollars, and that China is now in those countries behaving as if it is a saviour.

frank
May 31, 2021

USA will always be the dominant economy and this decoupling of china is just propaganda .Take for example the per capita income of each country it is huge . China is still considered a third world economy . The communist party is selling this propaganda to keep the chinese people happy ,and to stay in power .If not we will see Tiananmen stage 2

Ruth
June 03, 2021

Not sure about that Frank. Empires rise and fall. China is determined to emerge dominant and the USA is shows signs of weakening as an empire. It's difficult for me to analyse as so much is unknown about the real situation in China in so many ways. I feel that whoever makes the greater technological advancements may hold the upper hand. I wouldn't like to see China get hold of Taiwan's superior microchip industry. We live in interesting times!

C
May 30, 2021

Mervyn, do we really want to live in a country dominated by America? The individualism the exceptionalism, the personality politics, the military- industrial complex. Our PM can send us to war. Should one individual hold so much power.

Ruth
June 03, 2021

I think China is already at war with the west. They are using various strategies to win, the primary one being economic. This is evident from their state-sponsored newspaper articles and the way they have chosen to strike against their neighbours during their pandemic-inducing weakness, which will last for years. The USA is weakening but is still our most important ally. Do you want to help defend the country or not?

Peter Cosh
May 27, 2021

Mervyn, with respect, you contradict yourself. While you make some good points, I don't think Jennifer's thinking is short term at all.
I agree we have technological capabilities, but as yet we haven't been able to take advantage of them in any significant way (with a few exceptions). Unless we can change this, we will remain heavily reliant on resources. I also agree our self serving politicians are a millstone around Australia's neck, but again unless we can change this, we will not progress as we should. It seems our politicians first thought when developing policy is "how is this going to benefit my career and help me get another term?" rather than what is the best benefit for Australia? The areas of trade, defence, immigration etc., deserve better.
These are two big "ifs" and unless addressed, we will all fall "into China's trap". Jennifer is correct to be concerned about Australia's future, as we all should be.

James
May 27, 2021

It is strange that a financial website got into geo politics rhetoric?

Jennifer
May 27, 2021

We don't make much, we did stuff out of the ground and sell it to China. It finances our way of life. When this stops, will we be the first Australians whose grandchildren are worse off than we are?

Mervyn Cross
May 27, 2021

Jennifer, do you really want your grandchildren to be in an Australia dominated by China? Your thinking is very short-sighted and way out of date. Australia has the technical knowhow and ability to achieve much more than simply be a miner. That is very evident today; just take the time to investigate what many Australian companies are researching and developing.You will be surprised.The limiting factor is our self-serving politicians, who are incapable of formulating strategies to exploit our capabilities and formulate a vision where Australia needs to be in 20 or 30 years time. Jennifer, you are falling into China's trap.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Five trends shaping investments in China: 2021 and beyond

Just how reliant on China are we?

We’re number 106, and that’s not good

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.