Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 492

Chris Joye on why stocks and property are set for a poor year

This is an edited transcript of an interview by Tom Piotrowski of CommSec with Coolabah Capital Investments CIO Christopher Joye.

 

Tom Piotrowski: There was a point where a significant proportion of the global bond market was negatively yielding. Now, we've seen a rapid increase in rates. I'm interested in the very simple intellectual process that you have in terms of trying to make sense of those moves.

Joye: I think, after the GFC, and really, for the last 30 years, interest rates have come down from circa 17% in 1990 to 0% recently, and that was because we had no inflation. But we always felt that in response to the GFC, we'd get low rates and lots of money printing and the money printing would bid up the value of all assets, and that would inevitably create excess demand and too much inflation. With the pandemic, we threw in a huge supply shock, and the money printing increased with gusto, and rates were even more stimulatory, and we also had governments through fiscal policy give out record amounts of cash.

We had the mother of all supply and demand side inflation storms. We've been faced with the highest inflation rates in 40 years, and late last year, we argued that rates would have to go much, much higher. So, the RBA cash rate was at zero and same in the U.S., and we argued that the Fed would have to lift its cash rate above 3%. And 10-year bond yields issued by governments, which were sitting around 1% late last year, we argued would have to go to north of 3.2%.

Importantly, that would have a few consequences. We forecast that would reduce the value of equities by more than 30%, specifically U.S. equities. We said crypto would crash in December last year. We said in October last year that Aussie house prices would fall by 15% to 25% and that credit spreads would widen.

And that's actually all negative for my asset class, because fixed rate bonds, their price falls when yields rise. And when credit spreads widen, prices also fall. Bond markets had basically their worst year in about 100 years. 

And everything that we thought would happen more or less came to pass. The quid pro quo is now we sit in the world with high interest rates, wide credit spreads, and my asset class, which I really strongly disliked – in fact, we put on $10 billion of bond shorts late last year through to mid this year to express that negative view to profit from bond prices falling. But those assets, bonds which looked terrible for a while, suddenly look attractive.

Piotrowski: They look attractive in relative terms given where we've come from. But the question that the markets struggle with is, what's the terminal point at which they stop hiking. What's your thinking?

Joye: Here in Australia, we're at 3.1%. We were at 0.1% last year. And a 300-basis-point increase is the biggest increase more or less ever. When banks were lending home loans to customers in 2020 and 2021, they were offering these super cheap fixed rate deals at circa 2% for three-year or four-year loans. The regulator, APRA, said the banks only need to stress a borrower's capacity to repay by a 2.5% increase in interest rates or a 250-basis-point increase. And the RBA has now increased rates by 300 with more to come.

Piotrowski: Yeah. So, more than redlining.

Joye: We're redlining. To answer your question, the market is saying that the RBA will finish at a cash rate of about 3.7%. Our sense is they may conk out a little bit before then, so maybe low 3s. But we're talking about the difference between two or three meetings.

Make no mistake though, the RBA is absolutely crushing the economy. House prices are falling, consumer confidence is today worse than it was in the GFC, retail spending is nose diving, business confidence has collapsed, and there is a risk the economy will go into recession. And according to the RBA's own numbers, if we get cash to 3.5%, 15% of all borrowers will actually have negative cash loads.

RBA cash rate

What does that mean? The RBA looked at their incomes, and it took off their mortgage repayments and only essential living expenses. And so, 15% are going to basically not have enough money to repay their home loans at a 3.5% cash rate, which is only a few meetings away. So, we think the RBA has probably overdone it. We think the RBA is aping the Fed. The Fed by March should be at 5%. Market is pricing about 4.9%. We think the Fed could go a little bit further, to 5% or 5.5%.

But I think the good news for everybody, if you're long – if you're in housing, commercial property, equities, crypto, bonds – the good news is, those terminal cash rates are very much just around the corner. They're in sight. 

The bad news is – and this is super important for people to understand – the different asset classes adjust with different speeds. In my bond portfolio, if the RBA lifts its rate, that day it's reflected in my portfolio, and my yields instantaneously adjust. If we think about house prices, they started falling in May 2022 in response to the hikes. But they will almost certainly fall for another 6 to 12 months. And if you look at commercial property, they've hardly adjusted. So commercial property yields remain incredibly low. You earn more on government bonds and senior ranking bank bonds than you do on commercial property, which makes no sense. Normally, commercial property pays you about 5% above government bonds, and right now, they're paying basically the same yield as government bonds because it's illiquid and it takes time to adjust. Venture capital and private equity – same deal. They will take time to adjust. Equities are liquid, as you know, and our view is that equities have adjusted to much higher interest.

We are forecasting a non-trivial U.S. recession. We're unconvinced that equities are fully pricing in the impact on earnings of not just a U.S. recession, but we think there will be a global recession. The likelihood is, we've never seen such synchronised global interest rate hikes and it's likely to have a big impact on demand.

Piotrowski: You've written that when the U.S. adjusts to an inflation shock, the decline tends to be north of 20% over that period.

Joye: Robert Shiller, who won the Nobel Prize, produces something called a cyclically-adjusted price earnings (CAPE) multiple that adjusts for the business cycle. So, it's like a longer-term P/E. And the U.S. equity market is a tail that wags the dog. So, when we model equities, we think about the U.S., because everything is going to follow with some sort of correlation or beta. And in December last year, the U.S. equity market had only once in the last 140 years been more overvalued, and that was right at the peak of the tech boom. And we've looked at every time these cyclically-adjusted P/Es get above 30 times, and I think we were at 39 times late last year…

Piotrowski: It's staggering. But then, again, sympathetic to what was happening from a central bank perspective.

Joye: Very sympathetic. But here's the data.

When we look at the CAPE ratios, when it goes above 30 times, in the next decade, equities most of the time give negative returns after adjusting for inflation. There are a few periods where they've given you small positive returns, but the returns are not that flash.

The problem is, we've seen the S&P500, peak to trough at some points has been down as much as 26% and NASDAQ has been down as much as 36%. Equities have adjusted a lot. But the starting point was heinously expensive. The average CAPE is 15 to 16 times. Today, we're still at 29 times. We are still massively expensive compared to history, and I think a lot of that was explained by the idea that rates would remain low for long and also the idea that money would be very cheap for a long time.

Shiller P/E ratio


Source: Robert Shiller

I'm not an equity expert. I am an expert on banks. Hence why we're trading bank stocks. But I think balance of probabilities, the returns from equities if we have a synchronised global recession over the next year, which is our central case, the returns for equities would be very poor.

And I think the existential crisis for all the investors listening to this is this. Bank stocks are paying you, as one example, a fully franked dividend yield at 5%. But I can get almost 5% on a CBA senior bond and I can get 6% on a CBA Tier 2 bond, and I can get about 5.5% on the CBA hybrid. So, these are safer securities, much safer than equity, and they're giving higher yield than equity. And that doesn't make sense. It doesn't make sense for commercial property to pay 4.5% to 5.5%. Across the Aussie equity market, the fully franked dividend yield is about 6%. With government bond yields at 3% to 4% and bank bond yields at 5% to 6%, the yields on everything need to increase, and the way that happens is through much lower prices.

Piotrowski: Are we heading towards anything that's going to look normal in the next little while, given what we've experienced in the last couple of years?

Joye: My view is all the central banks will hike too far. Economies will go into recession. They'll pull back rates, but not to 0.

You'll probably get some sort of modest bounce, but once asset prices, and I mean everything – property, crypto, equities, bonds, et cetera – adjust to the fact that risk-free cash will pay you 3% to 4%, so you'll be able to get term deposits for the foreseeable future paying 3% to 4%, and anything competing against term deposits is going to have to pay much more. Thereafter, I think you're going to see markets driven by income growth not interest rates.

If you think about house prices, all the house price moves really since 2007 have been driven by huge changes in the RBA's cash rate. But once it settles again, I think house prices will track wages. Wages grow at 3% to 4%. House price growth rather than being 7% to 10% is likely to be a lot lower, and I think that's also true of equities and other related assets.

 

Tom Piotrowski is an economist and market analyst at CommSec. Christopher Joye is Founder, Chief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager at Coolabah Capital Investments.

This is an edited transcript of an interview in December 2022. Listen to the full version here. Republished with permission.

 

6 Comments
Paul
January 23, 2023

I always enjoy (and generally agree) with Chris analysis especially on issues such as the bond market (not the equity market) being THE leading indicator on a macro basis. One small "adjustment" though - when comparing fully franked divi yields to that on senior/sub bonds, the "real" return needs to be after tax as opposed to the headline numbers quoted. The continued distortion provided by franking credits still disincentivises FI investment. That said, and I know Chris has analysed before, is if the net/relative spread between various parts of capital structure is cheap/expensive. My guess is that the equity/snr/sub spreads are showing that relative bond returns are starting to look cheaper vs their level of protection on the cap stack vs equity - oh, and before drawdowns of course!

Sven
January 23, 2023

Good commentary from Chris Joye but not a lot of specifics. I find it hard to believe people think long term inflation will sort itself out without weak labor markets - I don't believe that is possible!

Whilst there is anecdotal evidence of a softening in US tech employment , there is no global softening of employment so we are early in the cycle.

And history would suggest that when real wage growth falls below inflation an upside break of wage growth eventually occurs. Once started it is hard to stop without a substantial increase in the unemployment rate.

Most people today want immediacy (the internet has taught us this), however, this cycle will play out over many years with lower than expected investment returns.

Cash will look better in the rearview mirror.

Mark
January 22, 2023

I disagree with some of Chris' views on China, but here's the thing. I understand exactly what his position is, and I can either agree or disagree. Succinct, no jargon and strongly held views put forcefully.

S2H
January 20, 2023

If Twitter has taught me anything it is Christoper Joye doesn't need any one to talk on his behalf, but I think his view is that US equity markets haven't priced in an earnings contraction from a pending recession.

Alex
January 19, 2023

Joye recently acknowledged that inflation may have peaked in the US: "The big news this week has been the all-important official US inflation data, which confirmed that a sharp deceleration in consumer price pressures is under way." Not yet changing his view described in this article but maybe tilling the ground.

Grant
January 27, 2023

Inflation hasn't peaked in the US - what has peaked is the rate of increase in inflation. Headline YOY inflation still sits at 6.5% and core inflation at 5.7% ( almost triple the feds target). And while goods prices have been in freefall recently services inflation is not falling nor are services wages. And energy & other commodities prices supported by China coming out of lockdown.

Premature to think we are coming out of the woods quite yet.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Where to put your money these days

Passive investing has risks too

2015 asset class review and 2016 outlook

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Meg on SMSFs: Clearing up confusion on the $3 million super tax

There seems to be more confusion than clarity about the mechanics of how the new $3 million super tax is supposed to work. Here is an attempt to answer some of the questions from my previous work on the issue. 

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 566 with weekend update

Here are 10 rules for staying happy and sharp as we age, including socialise a lot, never retire, learn a demanding skill, practice gratitude, play video games (specific ones), and be sure to reminisce.

  • 27 June 2024

Australian housing is twice as expensive as the US

A new report suggests Australian housing is twice as expensive as that of the US and UK on a price-to-income basis. It also reveals that it’s cheaper to live in New York than most of our capital cities.

The catalyst for a LICs rebound

The discounts on listed investment vehicles are at historically wide levels. There are lots of reasons given, including size and liquidity, yet there's a better explanation for the discounts, and why a rebound may be near.

How not to run out of money in retirement

The life expectancy tables used throughout the financial advice and retirement industry have issues and you need to prepare for the possibility of living a lot longer than you might have thought. Plan accordingly.

The iron law of building wealth

The best way to lose money in markets is to chase the latest stock fad. Conversely, the best way to build wealth is by pursuing a timeless investment strategy that won’t be swayed by short-term market gyrations.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Have value investors been hindered by this quirk of accounting?

Investments in intangible assets are as crucial to many companies as investments in capital equipment. The different accounting treatment of these investments, however, weighs on reported earnings and could render ratios like P/E less useful for investors.

Investment strategies

Investors are threading the eye of the needle

As investors cram into ever narrower areas of the market with increasingly high valuations, Martin Conlon from Schroders says that sensible investing has rarely been such an uncrowded trade.

Economy

Persistent, but not permanent

There is universal consensus that the Earth is experiencing climate change. Yet there is far more debate about how this will impact different economies across the globe. New research sheds more light on the winners and losers.

SMSF strategies

How super members can avoid missing out on tax deductions

Claiming a tax deduction for personal super contributions can end in disappointment if it isn't done correctly. Julie Steed looks at common pitfalls and what is required for a successful claim.

Investment strategies

AI is not an over-hyped fad – but a killer app might be years away

The AI investment trend looks set to continue for years but there is only room for a handful of long-term winners. Dr Kevin Hebner also warns regulators against strangling innovation in the sector before society reaps the benefits.

Retirement

Why certainty is so important in retirement

Retirement is a time of great excitement but it is also one of uncertainty. This is hardly surprising given the daunting move from receiving a steady outcome to relying on savings and investments.

Economy

This vital yet "forgotten" indicator of inflation holds good news

Financial commentators seem to have forgotten the leading cause of inflation: growth in the supply of money. Warren Bird explains the link and explores where it suggests inflation is headed.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.