Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Register

1 May 2026

Home / 211

Clear winner and loser in 2017/2018 survey

Over 400 readers completed the short survey on expectations for market returns in this new financial year, and the results suggest optimism for overall share market performance.

Winner of the expected best-performer category

Unhedged international equities (46% of votes)

Equities received strong support, with unhedged global shares (46%), Australian small caps (22%) and Australian equities (15%) adding up to 83% of votes. There was little support for fixed interest, and with cash at only 4% of votes, few investors see a market rout.

Particularly notable is that international equities have come first in four of the previous five financial years, so there’s either little support for ‘reverting to the mean’, or people are extrapolating from recent performance. How much does the concentration in Australia’s market among banks, miners and retailers play a role?

Only 2% expect residential property to be the best, but as in all years, that’s where most of the investment dollars will go.

Winner (or loser) of the expected worst-performer category

Cash (33% of votes)

Expectations for the worst performer were somewhat more balanced, with cash and fixed interest adding up to 57% of nominations. Taking a look at the Morningstar numbers for each financial year since 1998, cash has only come bottom twice. There are usually one or two other asset classes that put in a bad year and underperform the defensive characteristics of cash. Last year, cash outperformed listed property and fixed interest.

A healthy 22% expect residential property to perform worst, which is a decent vote for the market finally losing its head of steam (in Sydney and Melbourne, at least).

Most nominated range for S&P/ASX200 Total Return Index

+5% to +10% (47% of votes)

A strong 87% of votes placed the Australian index in the range of 0% to 10%, with most above +5%. Given the US market is at all-time highs and Australian and global valuations look stretched, and with US rates rising, this is an optimistic note for steady performance. There was stronger support for +10% and better (7.5%) than a bad result of -10% or worse (only 3%).

We will report on the results of these predictions at the end of 2017/2018.

  •   20 July 2017
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
Paul
July 20, 2017

Graham, on your newsletter talking about ripping off existing customers, my bank offers walk in or “blow in” new customers 3% pa on their Maxi Savings account. Despite being a loyal customer over many years, they could only get me up to 2.7% after first stating that 2.55% was the rate for “high worth” existing customers. Bring on the Royal Commission!

Andre Lavoipierre
July 20, 2017

Graham, You state that last year cash outperformed listed property and fixed interest. Also it appears that respondents to the survey have fixed interest as third worst performing asset class in 2017-18. I think your next survey should split fixed interest into fixed and floating because the floating rate securities have done very well over the past year eg Esltree Funds Management, who invest in listed convertible preference shares and subordinated notes (commonly known as hybrids) returned 13.7%...not a bad return considering _the volatility is only circa 22% of its comparable equities.

Kenneth Maurice Ellis
July 20, 2017

Why are so many wanting to reduce the profit of our banks when the vast majority of all superannuation funds hove some exposure to them. Is it a desire to have a lower value for our superannuation? or just that people like bitching?

Cheers, Ken Ellis

Kevin
July 22, 2017

Hiya Kenneth.

I think it is human nature to bitch,and accept that if everybody repeats something then it must be true, and great wisdom.

I keep annual reports.Looking at WBC and ANZ around 1991 when they were suffering, net interest margins were around the 4.5% mark.When they came back to profit most years the profit as a %age of assets is 1%.That is almost constant from 1991 until now.Net margins have fallen to around the 2% mark (less for NAB).Yet since then politicians,crowds,experts, all repeating the same thing, huge profits (where),how could it not be true.

CBA funds me so in 1996 if my memory is correct they almost had 100 billion in gross assets.Net profit of almost $1 billion.Net margins of around 3.8 or3. 9 %.They have been so constant in net profit,always 1% or 1.1% of gross assets.Net margins down to around 2.07%.

I would think shortly CBA will have gross assets of $1 trillion,which will produce net profit of $10 billion.No doubt politicians will have their crocodile tears,vote for me and I will do something about these huge profits.I wish they would explain how 1% is a huge profit margin after taxes and expenses

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

Diversification is the foundation of a solid portfolio

Firstlinks is sponsored by:
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Indexation implications – key changes to 2026/27 super thresholds

Stay on top of the latest changes to superannuation rates and thresholds for 2026, including increases to transfer balance cap, concessional contributions cap, and non-concessional contributions cap.

The refinery problem: A different kind of energy crisis in 2026

The Strait of Hormuz closure due to US-Iran conflict severely disrupted global energy supply chains. While various emergency measures mitigated the crude impact, the refined product market faces unprecedented stress.

The missing 30%: how LIC returns are understated, and why it matters

The perceived underperformance of LICs compared to ETFs is due to existing comparison data excluding crucial information, highlighting the need for proper assessment and transparent reporting.

Little‑known government scheme can help retirees tap into $3 trillion of housing wealth

The Home Equity Access Scheme in Australia allows older homeowners to tap into their home equity for retirement income, yet remains underused due to lack of awareness and its perceived complexity.

Origins of the mislabeled capital gains tax ‘discount’

Debate over the CGT discount is intensifying amid concerns about intergenerational equity and housing affordability. This analysis shows that the 'discount' does not necessarily favor property investors.

Div 296 may mean your estate pays tax on assets your beneficiaries never receive

The new super tax, applying from 1 July, introduces more than just a higher rate on large balances. It brings into focus a misalignment between where wealth sits and where the tax on that wealth ultimately falls.

Latest Updates

The ultimate superannuation EOFY checklist 2026

Here is a checklist of 28 important issues you should address before June 30 to ensure your SMSF or other super fund is in order and that you are making the most of the strategies available.

Retirement

Two months into retirement

A retirement researcher's take on retirement and her focus on each of her six resource buckets to stay engaged during the transition and beyond.

Superannuation

Markets have always delivered for super fund members. What if they don’t?

What happens if market resilience in the face of ongoing geopolitical tensions ends? Potential decade-long market weakness shows the need for contingency planning.

Retirement

We tend to spend less in retirement …

Studies show that a drop in expenditure during retirement leads to a happier retirement. But when costs ramp up again later in life, it's a guaranteed income that makes spending more hurt less.

Shares

Can you value a share just using dividends?

A cow for her milk, a stock for her dividends. Investors are too quick to dismiss this valuation technique. 

Property

The 25-year property trust default is being questioned

The 33% CGT discount rate being floated isn’t random. It sits at the structural break-even between trust and company for the multi-property cohort. That’s driving the conversation we’re hearing now.

Investment strategies

Are active managers bringing a knife to a gunfight?

How passive investing has permanently changed market structure — and why sophisticated tools are now the price of survival.

Sponsors

Alliances

Site Map

About Firstlinks

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.