Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Register

4 December 2025

Home / 211

Clear winner and loser in 2017/2018 survey

Over 400 readers completed the short survey on expectations for market returns in this new financial year, and the results suggest optimism for overall share market performance.

Winner of the expected best-performer category

Unhedged international equities (46% of votes)

Equities received strong support, with unhedged global shares (46%), Australian small caps (22%) and Australian equities (15%) adding up to 83% of votes. There was little support for fixed interest, and with cash at only 4% of votes, few investors see a market rout.

Particularly notable is that international equities have come first in four of the previous five financial years, so there’s either little support for ‘reverting to the mean’, or people are extrapolating from recent performance. How much does the concentration in Australia’s market among banks, miners and retailers play a role?

Only 2% expect residential property to be the best, but as in all years, that’s where most of the investment dollars will go.

Winner (or loser) of the expected worst-performer category

Cash (33% of votes)

Expectations for the worst performer were somewhat more balanced, with cash and fixed interest adding up to 57% of nominations. Taking a look at the Morningstar numbers for each financial year since 1998, cash has only come bottom twice. There are usually one or two other asset classes that put in a bad year and underperform the defensive characteristics of cash. Last year, cash outperformed listed property and fixed interest.

A healthy 22% expect residential property to perform worst, which is a decent vote for the market finally losing its head of steam (in Sydney and Melbourne, at least).

Most nominated range for S&P/ASX200 Total Return Index

+5% to +10% (47% of votes)

A strong 87% of votes placed the Australian index in the range of 0% to 10%, with most above +5%. Given the US market is at all-time highs and Australian and global valuations look stretched, and with US rates rising, this is an optimistic note for steady performance. There was stronger support for +10% and better (7.5%) than a bad result of -10% or worse (only 3%).

We will report on the results of these predictions at the end of 2017/2018.

  •   20 July 2017
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
Paul
July 20, 2017

Graham, on your newsletter talking about ripping off existing customers, my bank offers walk in or “blow in” new customers 3% pa on their Maxi Savings account. Despite being a loyal customer over many years, they could only get me up to 2.7% after first stating that 2.55% was the rate for “high worth” existing customers. Bring on the Royal Commission!

Andre Lavoipierre
July 20, 2017

Graham, You state that last year cash outperformed listed property and fixed interest. Also it appears that respondents to the survey have fixed interest as third worst performing asset class in 2017-18. I think your next survey should split fixed interest into fixed and floating because the floating rate securities have done very well over the past year eg Esltree Funds Management, who invest in listed convertible preference shares and subordinated notes (commonly known as hybrids) returned 13.7%...not a bad return considering _the volatility is only circa 22% of its comparable equities.

Kenneth Maurice Ellis
July 20, 2017

Why are so many wanting to reduce the profit of our banks when the vast majority of all superannuation funds hove some exposure to them. Is it a desire to have a lower value for our superannuation? or just that people like bitching?

Cheers, Ken Ellis

Kevin
July 22, 2017

Hiya Kenneth.

I think it is human nature to bitch,and accept that if everybody repeats something then it must be true, and great wisdom.

I keep annual reports.Looking at WBC and ANZ around 1991 when they were suffering, net interest margins were around the 4.5% mark.When they came back to profit most years the profit as a %age of assets is 1%.That is almost constant from 1991 until now.Net margins have fallen to around the 2% mark (less for NAB).Yet since then politicians,crowds,experts, all repeating the same thing, huge profits (where),how could it not be true.

CBA funds me so in 1996 if my memory is correct they almost had 100 billion in gross assets.Net profit of almost $1 billion.Net margins of around 3.8 or3. 9 %.They have been so constant in net profit,always 1% or 1.1% of gross assets.Net margins down to around 2.07%.

I would think shortly CBA will have gross assets of $1 trillion,which will produce net profit of $10 billion.No doubt politicians will have their crocodile tears,vote for me and I will do something about these huge profits.I wish they would explain how 1% is a huge profit margin after taxes and expenses

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

Diversification is the foundation of a solid portfolio

Firstlinks is sponsored by:
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

Why it’s time to ditch the retirement journey

Retirement isn’t a clean financial arc. Income shocks, health costs and family pressures hit at random, exposing the limits of age-based planning and the myth of a predictable “retirement journey".

The housing market is heading into choppy waters

With rates on hold and housing demand strong, lenders are pushing boundaries. As risky products return, borrowers should be cautious and not let clever marketing cloud their judgment.

Latest Updates

Interviews

AFIC on the speculative ASX boom, opportunities, and LIC discounts

In an interview with Firstlinks, CEO Mark Freeman discusses how speculative ASX stocks have crushed blue chips this year, companies he likes now, and why he’s confident AFIC’s NTA discount will close.

Investment strategies

Solving the Australian equities conundrum

The ASX's performance this year has again highlighted a persistent riddle facing investors – how to approach an index reliant on a few sectors and handful of stocks. Here are some ideas on how to build a durable portfolio.

Retirement

Regulators warn super funds to lift retirement focus

Despite three years under the retirement income covenant, regulators warn a growing gap between leading and lagging super funds, driven by poor member insights and patchy outcomes measurement.

Shares

Australian equities: a tale of two markets

The ASX seems a market split in two: between the haves and have nots; or those with growth and momentum and those without. In this environment, opportunity favours those willing to look beyond the obvious.

Investment strategies

Dotcom on steroids Part II

OpenAI’s business model isn't sustainable in the long run. If markets catch on, the company could face higher borrowing costs, or worse, and that would have major spillover effects.

Investment strategies

AI’s debt binge draws European telco parallels

‘Hyperscalers’ including Google, Meta and Microsoft are fuelling an unprecedented surge in equity and debt issuance to bankroll massive AI-driven capital expenditure. History shows this isn't without risk.

Investment strategies

Leveraged single stock ETFs don't work as advertised

Leveraged ETFs seek to deliver some multiple of an underlying index or reference asset’s return over a day. Yet, they aren’t even delivering the target return on an average day as they’re meant to do.

Sponsors

Alliances

Site Map

About Firstlinks

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.