Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Register

6 October 2026

Home / 211

Clear winner and loser in 2017/2018 survey

Over 400 readers completed the short survey on expectations for market returns in this new financial year, and the results suggest optimism for overall share market performance.

Winner of the expected best-performer category

Unhedged international equities (46% of votes)

Equities received strong support, with unhedged global shares (46%), Australian small caps (22%) and Australian equities (15%) adding up to 83% of votes. There was little support for fixed interest, and with cash at only 4% of votes, few investors see a market rout.

Particularly notable is that international equities have come first in four of the previous five financial years, so there’s either little support for ‘reverting to the mean’, or people are extrapolating from recent performance. How much does the concentration in Australia’s market among banks, miners and retailers play a role?

Only 2% expect residential property to be the best, but as in all years, that’s where most of the investment dollars will go.

Winner (or loser) of the expected worst-performer category

Cash (33% of votes)

Expectations for the worst performer were somewhat more balanced, with cash and fixed interest adding up to 57% of nominations. Taking a look at the Morningstar numbers for each financial year since 1998, cash has only come bottom twice. There are usually one or two other asset classes that put in a bad year and underperform the defensive characteristics of cash. Last year, cash outperformed listed property and fixed interest.

A healthy 22% expect residential property to perform worst, which is a decent vote for the market finally losing its head of steam (in Sydney and Melbourne, at least).

Most nominated range for S&P/ASX200 Total Return Index

+5% to +10% (47% of votes)

A strong 87% of votes placed the Australian index in the range of 0% to 10%, with most above +5%. Given the US market is at all-time highs and Australian and global valuations look stretched, and with US rates rising, this is an optimistic note for steady performance. There was stronger support for +10% and better (7.5%) than a bad result of -10% or worse (only 3%).

We will report on the results of these predictions at the end of 2017/2018.

  •   20 July 2017
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
Paul
July 20, 2017

Graham, on your newsletter talking about ripping off existing customers, my bank offers walk in or “blow in” new customers 3% pa on their Maxi Savings account. Despite being a loyal customer over many years, they could only get me up to 2.7% after first stating that 2.55% was the rate for “high worth” existing customers. Bring on the Royal Commission!

Andre Lavoipierre
July 20, 2017

Graham, You state that last year cash outperformed listed property and fixed interest. Also it appears that respondents to the survey have fixed interest as third worst performing asset class in 2017-18. I think your next survey should split fixed interest into fixed and floating because the floating rate securities have done very well over the past year eg Esltree Funds Management, who invest in listed convertible preference shares and subordinated notes (commonly known as hybrids) returned 13.7%...not a bad return considering _the volatility is only circa 22% of its comparable equities.

Kenneth Maurice Ellis
July 20, 2017

Why are so many wanting to reduce the profit of our banks when the vast majority of all superannuation funds hove some exposure to them. Is it a desire to have a lower value for our superannuation? or just that people like bitching?

Cheers, Ken Ellis

Kevin
July 22, 2017

Hiya Kenneth.

I think it is human nature to bitch,and accept that if everybody repeats something then it must be true, and great wisdom.

I keep annual reports.Looking at WBC and ANZ around 1991 when they were suffering, net interest margins were around the 4.5% mark.When they came back to profit most years the profit as a %age of assets is 1%.That is almost constant from 1991 until now.Net margins have fallen to around the 2% mark (less for NAB).Yet since then politicians,crowds,experts, all repeating the same thing, huge profits (where),how could it not be true.

CBA funds me so in 1996 if my memory is correct they almost had 100 billion in gross assets.Net profit of almost $1 billion.Net margins of around 3.8 or3. 9 %.They have been so constant in net profit,always 1% or 1.1% of gross assets.Net margins down to around 2.07%.

I would think shortly CBA will have gross assets of $1 trillion,which will produce net profit of $10 billion.No doubt politicians will have their crocodile tears,vote for me and I will do something about these huge profits.I wish they would explain how 1% is a huge profit margin after taxes and expenses

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

Diversification is the foundation of a solid portfolio

Firstlinks is sponsored by:
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

Site Map

About Firstlinks

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.