Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 262

Contributing super for your spouse

Have you considered contributing for a spouse to even up your superannuation balances? It may maximise combined super balances without running into the $1.6 million super cap trap introduced on 1 July 2017. Getting even can pay dividends for your super!

An illustration

Consider Sam, 66, who reduced his account-based pension balance to $1.6 million on 1 July 2017 and transferred $450,000 into accumulation phase. His wife Isabella, 62, has $420,000 in super, which is a lot less than Sam’s balance due to her family responsibilities creating interrupted work patterns.

Sam is unable to make non-concessional contributions (NCCs) to super as he exceeds the $1.6 million total superannuation balance. Besides, the income earned on the amount he transferred to accumulation phase is taxed at 15%, so it may be better for Isabella to top up her super balance to even it up with Sam. There are a number of strategies that could be used.

Sam could make a spouse contribution for Isabella to increase her superannuation balance. If Isabella earned less than $37,000 (adjusted income), any NCCs made by Sam on her behalf would qualify for a low-income-spouse tax offset of up to $540 for the first $3,000 of the NCCs he makes for her.

Eligibility for spouse super contributions

To be eligible to make spouse contributions for Isabella:

  • Sam and Isabella must be Australian residents at the time the NCCs are made for the spouse
  • The spouse contributions must not be made as part of a family law obligation to split contributions with Isabella
  • The contributions must be made to a complying superannuation fund on behalf of Isabella
  • Sam and Isabella must not be living separately or apart on a permanent basis when the NCCs are made
  • Isabella must be under age 65 (or if she was between age 65 and 69, then she must have met the work test of at least 40 hours in 30 consecutive days)
  • Sam should not have claimed a tax deduction for the contributions made for Isabella
  • Isabella’s income must be less than $37,000 for Sam to be eligible for the tax offset. The maximum tax offset of $540 deceases if Isabella’s adjusted income is above $37,000 and phases out to $0 once her adjusted income reaches $40,000
  • Isabella’s total superannuation balance must be below $1.6 million on 30 June in the year prior to the spouse contribution being made, and
  • Isabella must not have not exceeded her NCC cap for the financial year.

Tax offsets

Let’s assume Sam and Isabella meet all eligibility requirements to be eligible for the low-income-spouse tax offset and Isabella’s adjusted income is $20,500 for the current financial year. Sam decides to make a $5,000 contribution on behalf of Isabella in June 2018. He would be entitled to the full tax offset of $540 in his 2018 income tax return. This is calculated as 18% of the first $3,000 of the NCC he made for Isabella, as her adjusted income is below the $37,000 threshold and she meets all the other requirements for Sam to be eligible for the tax offset.

The spouse contribution forms part of Isabella’s NCCs and the maximum that Sam could contribute is up to Isabella’s NCC cap. As Isabella is under age 65 and has a total super balance of less than $1.6 million, her NCC cap is $300,000 under the bring forward provisions. Sam could potentially contribute up to this amount for Isabella, however, would only be entitled to a maximum tax offset of $540 in doing so.

Benefits of even super balances for a couple

There are many ways someone under age 65 can contribute to superannuation, either directly or indirectly. Isabella’s superannuation benefits could be boosted by her making NCCs which could qualify for the co-contribution of up to $500, Sam could split his concessional contributions with Isabella and she may wish to make concessional contributions in the right conditions.

 

Graeme Colley is the Executive Manager, SMSF Technical and Private Wealth and Emma Partenza is an SMSF Technical Specialist at SuperConcepts. This article is general information and does not consider any individual’s investment objectives.

SuperConcepts is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers from SuperConcepts, please click here.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

How the super contribution changes may benefit you

New super doors opening from 1 July 2017

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.