Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 177

Court defends super death benefits from bankruptcy

Protection from creditors is an unsung benefit of superannuation. Life does not always go according to Plan A.

I keep hammering it into my small business clients in particular that, while they may be passionate about their business and absolutely certain that it will succeed, they need to have a Plan B. Things can go wrong no matter how hard they work.

Superannuation is that Plan B in many cases. By putting a portion of profits away each year into super, they can minimise their tax obligations, save for retirement and protect some of their hard-earned wealth from unforeseen circumstances like a business collapse.

I always give the example of a client who had a successful software business who listened to me and put funds away in super yearly despite not wholly trusting the system. A dodgy overseas firm copied and made minor changes to his software and sold it for 10% of his price, thereby decimating his profits. He could lose everything, as the ensuing defence of his patents in court cases is wiping out his personal finances and those of his company. Even if he wins, they could just keep their assets overseas and he has no chance of recovering costs and damages. If he loses, they could chase his assets to recover their costs. The one thing protected is his superannuation, which will provide a decent, if slightly less comfortable, retirement.

The recent case of Trustees of the Property of Morris (Bankrupt) v Morris (Bankrupt) [2016] FCA 846 shows what happens when superannuation, bankruptcy and the payment of death benefits intersect.

Background

Ms Morris became bankrupt 3-4 months after her husband, Mr Foreman, died. Mr Foreman held two policies with two different superannuation funds: AustSafe Super and Plum Super.

After becoming bankrupt, Ms Morris received three separate payments. Plum Super made a life insurance payment of $311,865.95, which is not controversial, as section 116(2)(d)(ii) of the Act provides that divisible property does not extend to life assurance policy proceeds of a bankrupt, or their spouse, received on or after the date of bankruptcy.

What was 'controversial’ was AustSafe Super’s payment of $45,392.48 and Plum Super’s payment of $67,240.27. Both funds made these payments to the bankrupt under discretionary powers, as Mr Foreman had not nominated any dependents or beneficiaries.

Ms Morris’s bankruptcy trustees applied to court in respect of these payments, arguing that the superannuation monies received by the bankrupt were after-acquired property that vested in them (as bankruptcy trustees) and was therefore divisible among the bankrupt estate’s creditors.

I am not a lawyer so I will not go into details of the argument but there is a good blog on the subject by Bryce Figot of DBA Lawyers – see more here and the actual case decision here.

In summary

Justice Logan held that prior to the superannuation fund trustees’ exercising their discretion in favour of Ms Morris, she had no interest in either fund. However, on this favourable decision, an interest was then created in the superannuation funds, and therefore these payments (totalling $112,632.75) made to Ms Morris (after bankruptcy) were held to be captured by s116(2)(d)(iii) and s116(2)(d)(iv) of the Act. Consequently, the bankruptcy trustees were unsuccessful with their application and Ms Morris retained the money.

So superannuation death benefits received by the bankrupt were protected from bankruptcy trustees.

I have not seen any previous guidance or authorities about the meaning and effect of the above sections of the Act. The decision seems to be consistent with the intention of legislation to protect and preserve benefits in respect of retirement for both members of funds as well as their spouses and dependants.

If you or your spouse are in business, or in a highly litigious profession, or high-risk investors, then talk to an advisor about your Plan B.

 

Liam Shorte is a specialist SMSF advisor and Director of Verante Financial Planning. This article contains general information only and does not address the circumstances of any individual. You should seek professional personal financial advice before acting.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Death benefits from super don't need to be this complicated

Strategies for avoiding the super 'death duty'

When death benefits include life insurance

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.