Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 88

Culture and competitive advantage

Anyone involved in a team sport will tell you about the importance of team spirit and cohesion – whether on the pitch, the training field or in social circles after a game. It’s the intangible glue that binds together a group of talented athletes and makes them a grand final or a test match winning team. Some teams, no matter how talented, just don’t have it and don’t realise their full potential. Others realise their potential for a season, or two. The true challenge is to maintain that culture for a sustained period, season after season.

The corporate environment is no different. Talk to a CEO or a senior executive and often in short order you will be talking about the firm's culture – the values, behaviours and beliefs that pervade the entire organisation. In a good company, culture drives the businesses strategy. It guides the way employees work together. And ultimately, culture shapes the type of experience a firm delivers to its employees and clients. But what makes a strong culture and how does a firm cultivate and maintain it? It depends in part on the type of business. In my view, the best investment cultures are built on collaboration, humility, and mutual respect. There should be no stars — only teams, equality and a healthy exchange of ideas.

A strong culture matters a lot — particularly for an investment firm, where people and judgment are the greatest assets. In fact, research has shown powerful links between culture and success in asset management firms. Studies done by Focus Consulting Group (in 2009, 2010 and 2013) showed improved decision-making along with attracting and retaining talent are the most tangible benefits of a positive culture.

Culture drives the way teams interact and collaborate to make investment decisions, which impacts how well a strategy performs, how the firm does as a whole and how sustainable the performance is.

Great minds don't necessarily think alike

A collaborative culture doesn't mean everyone has to think the same way. In fact, diverse views usually lead to better decisions because they allow multiple perspectives and different analytics to get to a better outcome. In order to benefit from those diverse views, however, you need to build teams thoughtfully and create an environment that supports idea exchange and challenge. Cultural, gender and multi-disciplinary diversity on a team can enhance cognitive diversity through different experiences and thought processes.

Using teams makes sense for complex tasks like investing, particularly as businesses become more global and supply chains become more complex.

The way you share different views matters as much as the willingness to allow them. You need to actively work against ‘group-think’. Encouraging team members to offer different views helps a team sift through increasingly large amounts of industry information, filter out the noise and focus on good research. By debating the information together rather than acting on it alone, you can minimise individual biases. Ultimately what you get is an environment of constructive challenge aimed at providing better results for clients.

As part of the fabric of a view-sharing environment, you need common cultural values. It's tough to debate investment ideas thoughtfully unless you have a common understanding of the end goal. In fact, research on team building shows that common cultural values form the bedrock for cognitive diversity that leads to differentiated performance (Mauboussin and Callahan, 2014).

Walk the talk

An investment firm's beliefs and philosophies should be ingrained in its behaviour. For example, if you believe that a longer-term investment horizon results in greater opportunity for differentiated performance, your culture must support it. You must reward longer-term performance, tolerate short-term underperformance and follow both an investment process and team orientation that supports these objectives. It's not easy to create this kind of culture and maintain it over time. You need strong buy-in from senior leadership as well as institutional supports.

Increasing globalisation and complexity calls for collaboration and teamwork, not just around the globe but also across capital structures. Consider an equity analyst who can look at company valuations, macroeconomic factors and the competitive environment but typically wouldn't have a lot of debt experience. Now combine that view with a fixed-income perspective that looks at more complex credit issues central to the company's capital structure, such as its financing facilities and debt covenants, and it provides a much more powerful perspective on a company's intrinsic value.

A culture of risk management should be embedded in the investment process and not appended or seen as an overlay. In practice, this means a portfolio manager thinks about risk as part of his or her research and security analysis, rather than as a portfolio constraint he or she sometimes encounters.

Don't set and forget

It's not enough to bring in talented people as any sports captain knows. If you want a collaborative culture to work, you need employees to live and breathe it so it's part of the fabric of the firm.

Keeping employees connected to the firm's culture helps them stay invested in the firm and its objectives. It also reduces staff turnover, which is critical to limiting disruption to portfolio management and reducing hiring and training costs for the firm. You must consistently align incentives with your investment and business objectives and keep performance measures transparent, from both a quantitative and qualitative perspective. The end goal is to create a meritocracy.

Positive cultures are the result of everyone on the team living the core values and acting from this standpoint. Those core values define how employees behave and how the firm does business. The leadership teams of investment firms need to set a visible example and, in this sense, they should be both carriers and cultivators of their culture.

Culture isn't a skill or a talent. Competitors can't recreate culture the way they can mimic an investment or business strategy. Firms and teams own their culture, and it’s up to the entire organisation to work hard at that culture to keep it alive.

 

Marian Poirier is? Head of Australia at MFS Investment Management.

 

  •   14 November 2014
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Three companies using technology to become global powerhouses

Julie Bishop on leaders, life, Liberals and libertines

Three key attributes of great companies

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.