Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 92

David Murray moves the goalposts

Campbell (Inquiry 1979), Wallis (Inquiry 1996) and Murray (Inquiry 2014) may all be splendid Scottish names but they will be forever etched in the history of Australian financial markets. Campbell opened our markets and Wallis gave us much of the regulatory structure, but David Murray has cast his net wider into both micro and macro issues in his 320 page (not 500 as I wrote in the newsletter) report.

This note is my initial reactions focussing on impacts for wealth management, including retirement, financial advice and superannuation. As Joe Hockey told the lock-up, you need to "read it and read it and read it" to capture all the content. So it is acknowledged that this is not a comprehensive review of the entire Report.

Joe Hockey issued the final Terms of Reference on 20 December 2013, and David Murray and his Inquiry have delivered the goods in under a year. The Final Report is available here.

Some highlights of the Report

It contains 44 recommendations, based on a test of meeting the public interest. It says the financial system has performed well since Wallis but has some weaknesses. It aims to make the system more efficient, resilient and fair, but still responsive to market forces.

Superannuation

Superannuation funds are now big businesses. The amount in superannuation surpasses the market capitalisation of all companies on the ASX and Australia's annual GDP. The Report notes super assets will probably exceed the banking system within 20 years.

The major recommendations are:

* seek broad political agreement for the overall objectives of superannuation. The Report says super does not have a consistent set of policies.

* the Government should restore the general prohibition on direct borrowings by super funds (page 86). This is a setback for the industry that has sprung up promoting borrowing to buy residential property under LRBAs. It will apply where the borrowing is used to purchase assets directly, so the broad range of managed funds and ETFs which internally gear their funds will not be affected. It will still be possible to gear a super fund but not directly.

* a formal competitive process may be needed to allocate new default fund members to MySuper products. This draws on a Grattan Institute study showing excessive superannuation fees and quoting the Chilean system where the right to manage 'default' funds is auctioned to the cheapest supplier. Another perspective on the Chilean system was provide in David Bell's article, and these problems will need to be addressed. The Report acknowledges much more work is required until a formal review by 2020 if Stronger Super is not working well.

* To assist longevity, trustees of super funds could select a comprehensive income product for retirement (CIPR) for their members, effectively pooling risk to ensure income throughout retirement. It would deliver an enduring income stream to give retirees more confidence that they can spend in retirement.

* Super funds should provide retirement income projections for members to improve engagement.

Financial advice

Although there has been enormous media and public focus on the quality of financial advice and especially the problems caused by vertically-integrated businesses (including the oft-quoted statistic that the four major banks plus AMP control 80% of Australian planners), the subject did not receive much attention in the Interim Report. However, it did contain this warning:

" There has been a tension between providing financial advice for the benefit of consumers and the product distribution role played by advisers ... The Inquiry considers the principle of consumers being able to access advice that helps them meet their financial needs is undermined by the existence of conflicted remuneration structures in financial advice."

The most significant proposal that affects the vertical integration financial advice model is to rename 'general advice' with a more appropriate, consumer-tested term. Advisers will also be required to disclose ownership structures.

The other main recommendations are:

* introduce a targeted and principles-based product design and distribution obligation. Page 198 of the Report is worth reading in full, as it describes this obligation, including identifying the target market and recognising the product's intended risk and return characteristics in the design phase. There needs to be an agreement with distributors on how the product will be distributed. Breaches would incur significant penalties.

* ASIC should have a 'product intervention power', which would allow products to be banned or materially changed.

* remove impediments to product disclosure and improve fee and risk communication with consumers.

* better align interests of financial firms with those of consumers, including remuneration structures and ensuring life insurance and stockbroking businesses do not affect the quality of advice.

* raise the competency of financial advisers including an enhanced register of advisers.

Post-retirement income

The Report has a heavy focus on post-retirement income. The Interim Report had said:

"If superannuation benefits are not transformed into retirement income streams effectively, taxpayers ultimately carry significant risk in the form of higher Age Pension costs."

 

Super balances

Super balances

The Report argues superannuation assets are not being converted to efficient post-retirement outcomes, and the development of a CIPR as mentioned above receives high profile (see page 117).

Self Managed Super Funds (SMSFs)

SMSFs now hold about $600 billion of Australia's $1.8 trillion in superannuation with one million trustees. However, on my first read, the sector does not receive significant attention. Although SMSF borrowings are estimated at only about 1% of assets, the Report recommends removal of the ability for all super funds to borrow, including SMSFs. The argument goes that investors have many other ways outside super to lever their investments, and superannuation savings should not be put at risk by more leverage.

This is a controversial recommendation opposed by many SMSF specialists, but I support the approach. Some people need to be protected from themselves, and property spruikers will take advantage of too may people if borrowing is allowed. See my arguments here and here and my submission to the FSI here.

There are significant differences in asset allocation between SMSFs and large APRA-regulated funds. In particular, SMSFs hold little foreign securities but about 30% in cash. However, on first read, I could not see any recommendations on ways to address this.

Super asset allocation

Fees

Murray believes there is little evidence of strong fee-based competition in the superannuation sector, and operating costs and fees appear high by international standards. This indicates there is scope for greater efficiencies in the superannuation system.

The formal competitive process described above is designed to improve competition and efficiency in super, to be introduced by 2020 if Stronger Super is not effective (see page 101). The Report says 50% of MySuper products have fees ranging from 84bp to 117bp, and it believes there is much scope for this to fall further. If APRA-regulated funds could reduce fees by 30bp, the savings for investors would be $3.5 billion per annum.

Governance of superannuation funds

The Report also recommends a majority of independent directors on the boards of the trustees of public offer superannuation funds including an independent chair, and a strengthening of the conflict of interest requirements.

 

This information is general in nature and takes no account of any investor's personal financial circumstances. Investors should consider taking professional advice on their investments. There are many other aspects of the Report which will be covered in later editions of Cuffelinks.

11 Comments
Colin
December 12, 2014

Chris, I read your emails with interest - keep up the great work!

If appropriate could you comment on the following from the new report
'The Tax White Paper should consider the removal of tax barriers to a seamless transition to retirement and target superannuation tax concessions to the superannuation system’s objectives. Adjustments to tax settings and efforts to improve equity have been major contributors to superannuation policy change in the past. The Inquiry believes community concerns about these issues need to be addressed to achieve greater policy stability and long-term confidence and trust in the system.'

I have pondered over this statement and clearly missing some salient point. Are they suggesting zero tax in the accumulation phase, or taxing in the pension phase? Either way I'm not understanding why this is a 'tax barrier' from accumulation to pension? Is it not an advantageous position and encourages folks to wind down a little from their often high work hours jobs?

Any pointers you are able to provide would be appreciated.

Tim
December 11, 2014

The FSI report also discussed the merits of (1) introducing an investment earnings tax on super in pension phase, (2) a higher super earnings tax rate on super balances over a certain threshold, and (3) tightening of the $540,000 NCC cap under the bring forward rule.

Yes - policy goes round in circles every 5-10 years.

SMSF Trustee
December 09, 2014

John Kay, I also have international shares in my fund. However, I don't know that even you and me combined would amount to enough to prove that the overall data that is in the table has the picture completely wrong. Just because two of us have international shares doesn't mean it's common and doesn't mean the ATO are as stupid as people want to believe.

Besides, they probably are referring to direct holdings, in which case I've no doubt the data are correct. Your funds and mine are included in the 'other assets', which probably also includes domestic share funds.

Tim
December 09, 2014

Good point John. Another example of ATO data fields being ambiguous and therefore useless.

John Kay
December 09, 2014

The chart 3.9 shows that SMSFs have almost no exposure to International Shares. These numbers from the ATO are a total fiction. When I complete my annual SMSF tax return showing Asset Allocation any Overseas Shares held by LIC's and Managed Funds are counted as Australian Investments.
In my case I have a large investment in Vanguard Global Infrastructure fund and also in the LICs PM Global and Hunter Hall which are categorised as 100% Australian.

Ross Laidlaw
December 08, 2014

Thanks for the early summary, it helps when you hit the key points that could have an impact on the industry. Well Done

Mal
December 08, 2014

One assumption inherent in income provision for retirees is that the same level of income, indexed, will be required no matter what age the person is. In fact the capacity to spend declines with age, although health costs rise a little for most. A person should be free to spend more during the early years of retirement when health and energy enable enjoyment of travel etc.

Richard Mews
December 07, 2014

Good summary and very quick, nothing very controversial in these parts of the Report.

Douglas
December 07, 2014

Great to see a pertinent early summary, thank you.

Peter C
December 07, 2014

Handy, you really have become a journo. Cuffelinks first re FSI. Great stuff.

MIchael Clancy
December 07, 2014

Thanks for the quick summary Graham!

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Back to the future with Murray's super objective

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates

Retirement

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Property

Hey boomer, first home buyers and all the fuss

What is APRA worried about? Most mortgagees can easily absorb increases in interest rates without posing a systemic threat to the banking system. Housing lending is a relatively risk-free activity for banks.

Property

Residential Property Survey Q3 2021

Housing market sentiment has eased from record highs and confidence has ticked down as house price rises slow. Construction costs overtook lack of development sites as the biggest impediment for new housing.

Investment strategies

Personal finance is 80% personal and 20% finance

Understanding your own biases and behaviours is even more important than learning about markets. Overcome four major cognitive biases that may be sabotaging your investing and recognise them in others.

Where do stockmarket returns come from over time?

Cash flow statements differ from income statements and balance sheets, and every company must balance payments to investors versus investing into the business. Cash flows drive the value of the business.

Fixed interest

How to invest in the ‘reopening of Australia’ in bonds

As Sydney and Melbourne emerge from lockdown, there are some reopening trades in the Australian credit market which 'sophisticated' investors should consider as part of their fixed income portfolios.

Shares

10 trends reshaping the future of emerging markets

Demand for air travel, China’s growing middle-class population, Brazil’s digital payments take-up, Indian IPOs, and increased urbanisation are just some of the trends being seen in emerging economies.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.