Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 576

Does a declaration of trust satisfy SMSF separation of asset regulations?

While separation of assets remains one of the most reported contraventions by SMSF auditors, the question is: does a declaration of trust satisfy the requirements of SMSF regulations?

It is a complex matter that demands examination from many different perspectives, resulting in the typical “it depends” answer. One might think that a declaration of trust is a get-out-of-jail-free card for making a mistake when registering title to an asset, but it is not that simple. Like anything to do with SMSFs, there are many moving parts to consider, not least of which is understanding how trust law interacts with the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations (SIS).

The other issue is the many state and territory laws imposing different conditions for stamp duty, registration and document requirements.

SMSF legal requirements

SMSF trustees are obligated to keep money and other assets separate from any held by the trustee personally or from a standard employer-sponsor of the fund. Regardless of whether the fund’s trust deed contains this covenant, the regulations determine that the governing rules contain it.

SMSF assets cannot be held in the personal name of the member or trustee, regardless of whether the trustee is an individual or a director of a corporate trustee. Part of the requirement is to protect fund assets by establishing clear ownership in the event of a dispute to avoid costly litigation.

The ATO also clarifies that the principles of SMSF regulations apply to all types of assets, including shares, units in a trust and other property. Without clear title, the audit report may be qualified, and an auditor contravention report (ACR) lodged with the ATO.

Trust law requirements

A trustee must be legally capable of holding SMSF assets in their own right and for the benefit of the beneficiaries.

A duty of care applies to trustees in the management of trustee affairs on behalf of beneficiaries. They have obligations regarding the protection of member benefits and must be able to prove they are the legal owners of the assets.

The trustee’s overarching principle is to protect the interests of the beneficiaries, so where an asset is not held in the current name of the trustee, it is a breach of trust.

While this is not a reportable compliance breach in terms of trust law, other repercussions, such as litigation from beneficiaries whose interests were not protected, can arise.

Stamp Duty on Property Transfers

Stamp duty exemptions may apply to property transfers without a change to the beneficial owner. Paying out a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LBRA) is a typical example where the trustee’s name is changed, but the beneficial owner – the SMSF – remains the same.

While there is no requirement to change the bare trustee to the SMSF trustee under these circumstances, a cautionary red flag exists where these transfers occur. The reason is that while a nominal fee may apply in some jurisdictions if the trustee completes the correct paperwork in line with the specific instructions of the Office of State Revenue (OSR), there is no guarantee. Getting it wrong, however, can result in full stamp duty applying.

On the other hand, some states and territories require the title to be held in the name of the SMSF trustee only.

What happens when an SMSF has a multi-purpose corporate trustee and the title is transferred over to the same trustee but with a different beneficial owner? Firstly, the trust deed must allow the trustees to transfer assets through in-specie transfers. It is a dutiable event because the beneficial owner is changing. The trustees must lodge the paperwork with the relevant OSR and pay the correct stamp duty.

Incorrect Legal Title

The ATO gives very little away when it discusses why assets are not in the correct legal title of the SMSF. It provides few exceptions, the most notable due to an unavoidable restriction such as state or territory law. Where this happens, ownership must be established by “executing a caveat, or creating an instrument or declaration of trust to enable the fund to assert its ownership”.

In real terms, very few reasons will justify why the title is incorrect. When a trustee makes the mistake of not putting the trustee as the legal owner, trying to fix the issue can trigger bigger problems.  

Declaration of Trust

A declaration of trust is a legally binding document made before an asset is purchased, not afterwards. Where it is put in place for property purchases, for example, it must be registered in some states and territories to be effective. It is best to check the rules in each state and territory because it can trigger double stamp duty if drawn up after the property is purchased.

Acknowledgment of Trust

An acknowledgement of trust was previously the preferred document choice to prove ownership after an asset was purchased, but recent changes to NSW and Victorian state laws may now be a barrier. Legislative change in these states shows that making a statement akin to a declaration or acknowledgement of trust where the dutiable property is held (or to be held) on trust for identified beneficiaries may be liable to duty, even if made orally or in writing. As a result, requests for an acknowledgment of trust may result in unintended financial consequences, and trustees should seek legal advice in their respective jurisdictions before putting in place any such documentation.

Related Party Bare Trust

Using a related-party bare trust to address problems with asset ownership can result in further compliance contraventions. An asset held under a bare trust is not an in-house asset if a limited LRBA is in place that meets all the requirements. Unfortunately, where no LRBA has ever existed, it is a breach of the laws and the investment becomes an in-house asset of the fund.

The situation perfectly sums up where trying to resolve a potential compliance breach only creates a worse one.

Conclusion

A declaration of trust, or an acknowledgement of trust, is helpful where the trustee cannot legitimately hold an asset on trust for the fund. Further complications with changing OSR laws in various jurisdictions have effectively made drawing up either of these documents extremely expensive, as potential stamp duty issues arise if done incorrectly.

SMSF practitioners should be extremely cautious about requesting these particular documents from trustees who may require legal help to avoid red tape and unnecessary costs.

 

Shelley Banton is Head of Education at ASF Audits.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

A guide to valuing SMSF assets correctly

Help! My SMSF audit report has been qualified

More SMSF myths debunked

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever, updated

This time last year, I highlighted 16 ASX stocks that investors could own indefinitely. One year on, I look at whether there should be any changes to the list of stocks as well as which companies are worth buying now. 

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

2025-26 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ABS recently released figures which are used to determine key superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2025. This outlines the rates and thresholds that are changing and those that aren’t.  

Is Gen X ready for retirement?

With the arrival of the new year, the first members of ‘Generation X’ turned 60, marking the start of the MTV generation’s collective journey towards retirement. Are Gen Xers and our retirement system ready for the transition?

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

The intergenerational wealth transfer, largely driven by a housing boom, exacerbates economic inequality, stifles productivity, and impedes social mobility. Solutions lie in addressing the housing problem, not taxing wealth.

What Warren Buffett isn’t saying speaks volumes

Warren Buffett's annual shareholder letter has been fixture for avid investors for decades. In his latest letter, Buffett is reticent on many key topics, but his actions rather than words are sending clear signals to investors.

Latest Updates

World's largest asset manager wants to revolutionise your portfolio

Larry Fink is one of the smartest people in the finance industry. In his latest shareholder letter, the Blackrock CEO outlines his quest to become the biggest player in private assets and upend investor portfolios.

Economy

Australia's economic report card heading into the polls

Our economy grew by a nominal rate of 7% per annum from 2017 to 2024, but it benefited from the largesse of fiscal and monetary policies, both of which are now fading. We need a new, credible economic growth agenda.

Preference votes matter

If the recent polls are anything to go by, we are headed for a hung parliament at the upcoming federal election. So more than ever, Australians need to give serious consideration to their preference votes.

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Tips for the last member standing

It’s common for people as they age to seek more help in running their SMSF if their capacity declines. An alternate director may be a great solution for someone just planning for short-term help in the meantime.

Wilson Asset Management on markets and its new income fund

In this interview, Matthew Haupt from Wilson Asset Management discusses his outloook for the ASX, sectors such as REITs that he likes, and his firm's launch of a new income-oriented listed investment company.  

Planning

‘Life expectancy’ – and why I don’t like the expression

Life expectancy isn't just a number - it's a concept that changes with survival rates over time. This article breaks down how age, survival, and societal factors shape our understanding of life expectancy, especially post-Covid. 

The shine is back on gold, and gold miners

Gold mining stocks outperformed in 2024 and are expected to do well in 2025. At this point in the rally, it's worth considering what has driven gold prices higher and why miners could still have some catching up to do.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.