Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 48

The decline of margin lending

One of the features of the equity market bull run into 2007 was rapid growth in margin lending. Between January 2000 and September 2007, the total amount of outstanding margin loans in Australia grew from around $6 billion to over $40 billion. While this still did not represent a large fraction of the total capitalisation of the Australian market (around 3% of the total in 2007), it was a significant development for the retail end of the market.

When the equity market plunged during the GFC, so too did the volume of margin lending. In March 2009, total margin lending had shrunk to around $20 billion.

This makes intuitive sense. With the value of collateral sharply diminished, and confidence at reduced levels, it’s no surprise that margin lending levels fell sharply. What’s more interesting is what has happened since then.

As the chart below shows, since the bottom of the market in March 2009, equities have made good headway. While still not at pre-GFC levels, they have delivered healthy returns in recent years. Total margin lending, however, has continued to slide towards $10 billion, even as confidence has been returning to the market.

Chart 1. ASX200 and total margin loans outstanding

To our way of thinking, this is a healthy development. Some reasons to be wary of margin lending include:

  • it tends to be an expensive form of funding. Margin lending only benefits the investor where the return on the equities exceeds the cost of the debt. With the long run average return on equities running at perhaps 11% per annum, there isn’t much room left after paying interest rates close to 8% 
  • this benefit disappears altogether if margin calls force you to sell at the wrong time. After a significant fall in share prices, the most successful investors tend to be the ones buying. Often, they are buying from margin borrowers, who have no choice but to sell 
  • debt funding of any sort tends to bring with it sleepless nights. A cool head is a prerequisite to good investment decisions, and when things get challenging, high levels of debt are a menace to good order.

At Montgomery, we sit in the far corner of the room. We use no leverage, and usually have a material part of our funds sitting in cash. We also avoid investing in companies that have material debt on their balance sheets. This absence of leverage helps foster a steady approach to our decision-making when market conditions become challenging, as they often do.

It is unlikely we will change our attitude towards debt any time soon, but if we were to wake up one day and decide that some leverage would be good, it is unlikely to be a margin loan.

It will be interesting to see what happens to the margin lending industry from here. We expect that having learned some of the above lessons the hard way, investors who do gear into shares are increasingly doing so by borrowing against residential property. Provided gearing levels are kept to prudent levels, this type of borrowing is likely to deliver a much better experience for borrowers. Nevertheless, if markets continue to rise, it is likely that investors will become more adventurous and margin lending may return, with its higher cost of borrowing.

Over time, of course, a new generation of investors will emerge. Without the benefit of first-hand experience of the GFC, they may embrace margin lending as a shortcut to wealth. When that happens, we will be checking our valuations closely, probably starting to count the rows to the nearest exit.

This cautious approach will no doubt cause some investors to miss out on heady gains. However, patience is a great virtue in investing. On the road to wealth there are many shortcuts that offer themselves to the unwary, and for long-term investors, it’s wise to think carefully about these shortcuts, or avoid them altogether.

 

Roger Montgomery is the founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller 'Value.able'

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Duh! Of course geared funds won, but know the risks

Mortgage funds: if only we had a trendier name, like P2P

Financial leverage in real estate: friend or foe?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.