Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 637

Dumb money triumphant

Is the U.S. stock market in a bubble? I doubt we’re there yet, but one sign of speculative froth is the recent success of retail investors. On average, retail investors exhibit anti-skill in their stock selection decisions, meaning that their holdings underperform the market. So when retail investors are winning, that tells you that market conditions are unusual.

It is fair to describe retail investors as ‘dumb money’. While some find this phrase offensive, I think it’s accurate. The word ‘dumb’ is meant to describe their behavior, as opposed to their innate intelligence. Retail investors include highly intelligent and educated professionals, such as doctors and dentists. But they have a well-documented habit of making investment decisions that result in significant destruction of their own wealth, in other words, dumb behavior. Similarly, if finance professors ever try to perform surgery on themselves, it would be fair to call it ‘dumb surgery’.

When market prices get dumb, the dumb money gets rich. The initial success of the first wave of dumb money motivates a second wave of dumb money, which pushes up prices further. This feedback loop, Shiller’s “naturally occurring Ponzi scheme”, creates market bubbles. Lefèvre (1923) writes:

“The big money in booms is always made first by the public – on paper. And it remains on paper.”

According to this view, retail investors win in the initial stage of the bubble but eventually lose when the bubble deflates. Take, for example, the tech-stock bubble. It is clear that retail investors, partly acting indirectly via mutual funds as shown in Frazzini and Lamont (2008), bought tech stocks such as Cisco in the late 1990s.[1]

Here’s one story about the tech-stock bubble. Retail buying drove up the price of tech stocks such as Cisco, attracting yet more retail inflows. By the end of 1999, Cisco was one of the best-performing stocks, and retail investors, as a group, had outperformed. Call this retail outperformance ‘dumb alpha’. As of 1999, not only were tech stocks overpriced compared to other stocks, but the whole market was overpriced as its composition tilted toward tech. Thus, by late 1999, trailing positive dumb alpha coincided with an overpriced market.

This retail success couldn’t last, because prices eventually return to fundamental value. Thus, the positive dumb alpha of the late 1990s turned into the sharply negative dumb alpha of the early 2000s as the bubble deflated. Over long periods, retail investors lose, so dumb alpha is negative on average. However, during speculative episodes such as 1999 and 2021, dumb alpha can be positive.

Another example of positive dumb alpha comes from the initial stages of the South Sea Bubble of 1720. Here’s Edward Ward in his poem “A South-Sea Ballad, or, Merry Remarks upon Exchange-Alley Bubbles:”

Few men who follow reason’s rules
Grow fat with South Sea diet;
Young rattles and unthinking fools
Are those who flourish by it.

As of today, unthinking fools are once again flourishing while those who follow reason’s rules are not. We see ample evidence of positive dumb alpha in the U.S. stock market, as retail investors have outperformed the broad market over the past year.

Figure 1 shows cumulative returns on two ETFs reflecting retail investor holdings of U.S. stocks, one for U.S. investors and one for Korean investors. For U.S. retail investors, the SoFi Social 50 ETF consists of the top 50 holdings of clients of SoFi, a brokerage primarily serving U.S. customers. For Korean retail investors, the Samsung KODEX Investor’s Choice ETF consists of the top 25 U.S. common stocks held by Korean retail investors, as reported by the Korea Securities Depositary. In the past year, both of these ETFs have greatly outperformed, with total returns more than double those of the broad U.S. market, as measured by the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF.

Figure 1: Smart money vs. dumb money

Total cumulative return in the past year. Source: Acadian, based on data from Bloomberg. Most shorted is the Goldman Sachs Highest Short Interest Basket; U.S. retail is the SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF); Korean retail is the Samsung KODEX Investor’s Choice ETF (473460), USD return; Total stock market is the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Past performance is no guarantee of future results. For illustrative purposes only.

Since the dumb money is winning, you know that the smart money must be losing. Short sellers have been among the smartest money, historically. Typically, the stocks that short sellers sell are the same stocks that retail investors buy, as shown by McLean, Pontiff, and Reilly (2025). On average, short sellers win, since the stocks they short subsequently underperform. But lately, short sellers have been losing. Figure 1 shows the performance of the Goldman Sachs basket of most-shorted stocks. When these stocks go up, the smart money is hurting. The smart money has endured quite a bit of pain, especially in the past few months.

Dumb money winning, smart money losing—that’s a market heading down the road to crazy high prices for some popular stocks and possibly crazy high prices for the whole market. We saw a similar configuration of performance in 2021, which was followed by a decline in the whole market in 2022, but an especially severe decline in retail favorites, as the dumb alpha turned sharply negative.

Historically, stock market bubbles (and, more recently, crypto bubbles) have been fueled by stories about ordinary people becoming fabulously wealthy through their investments. Let me focus on just one group: waiters. When waiters are getting rich, maybe that’s the sign of a market top.

Consider this passage from The New York Times Magazine, March 24, 1929:

THE MAGNET OF DANCING STOCK PRICES; Playing the Market Is Now a Pastime And the Amateur Has His Day

The old-fashioned Wall Street theory that a bull market does not exist unless it is being played by bootblacks, household servants, clerks and others who ordinarily have but small amounts of surplus funds, has again been borne out. They are in the market by the hundreds, and some of them have rolled up luscious profits on their ten, twenty and fifty shares of stock. Two veteran waiters, who have given many years of their lives to service in the Bankers Club, have recently retired on profits accumulated in the market on advice given to them freely by men to whom they were accustomed to serve luncheon. One of them purchased a modest restaurant on Staten Island, paying for it in cash with his market profits. The other bought a farm on Long Island and is making plans for a fine little garden this Spring.

… It is quite true that the people who know least about the stock market have made the most money out of it in the last few months. Fools who rushed in where wise men feared to tread ran up high gains.

Now fast forward to the tech-stock bubble and take a look at Forbes from January 25, 1999:

Amateur hour on Wall Street

… a 25-year-old former waiter from Queens, N.Y., has a Pro-Star 300-megahertz Pentium laptop patched into E-Trade via America Online. With those tools, trading in and out of stocks like Navarre and Netscape, he turned $1,100 into $100,000 in two months. "Before, I was investing for the long term and I found out that it was not smart. Now my goal is a 1,000% return by 2000," he says.

… Each day a 5-million-strong mob of on-line investors is proving that when it comes to stock picking, might makes right. In their world, everything you have learned about rational pricing -- earnings or book values or even revenues -- is meaningless. Don't worry about the long haul.

Trade for the moment. Make a killing. Hey, everyone else in the chat group seems to be doing so.

Finally, we turn to the present day and find this piece in The Wall Street Journal, October 10, 2025:

More Working-Class Americans Than Ever Are Investing in the Stock Market

… he started putting almost every dollar of his paycheck from working as a server at the Cheesecake Factory into his investments. He followed influencers on X and YouTube who post frequently about their stock picks.

In 2023, he purchased hundreds of shares of data-analytics company Palantir. The next year, a wave of enthusiasm among individual investors like Cheney propelled the stock’s meteoric rise. The share price is up roughly 900% in the past two years.

… managing his seven-figure investment account is his primary passion.

“I feel like there’s been a shift,” he said. “Before retail was scoffed at. Now we’re a huge voice in how markets work.”

The similarities between 1929, 1999, and today are uncanny. Of course, it’s always possible to find winners in the stock market, just as it’s possible to find winners at the casino, so these anecdotes are only suggestive. That’s why the aggregate evidence shown in Figure 1 is helpful.

The two waiters mentioned in the 1929 article got out at the right time, converting their stock market winnings into other assets (a restaurant and a farm). But that’s not what retail investors typically do. Here’s Lefèvre again:

"In a bull market and particularly in booms the public at first makes money which it later loses simply by overstaying the bull market."

So, is it time to get out of the stock market? I don’t know, but maybe you should head over to your local Cheesecake Factory and ask around.

 

Endnotes

[1] References to this and other companies should not be interpreted as recommendations to buy or sell specific securities. Acadian and/or the author of this post may hold positions in one or more securities associated with these companies.

References

 

Owen A. Lamont, Ph.D. is Senior Vice President, Portfolio Manager, Research at Acadian Asset Management. Acadian Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 41 114 200 127) is the holder of Australian financial services license number 291872 ("AFSL"). This article is for informational purposes only. It must not be construed as investment or financial product advice. Acadian has not considered any reader's financial situation, objective or needs in providing the relevant information. The value of investments may fall as well as rise and you may not get back your original investment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance or returns.

 

  •   12 November 2025
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

My four enduring lessons from the 1987 crash

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

Family trusts: Are they still worth it?

Family trusts remain a core structure for wealth management, but rising ATO scrutiny and complex compliance raise questions about their ongoing value. Are the benefits still worth the administrative burden?

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

Property

The housing market is heading into choppy waters

With rates on hold and housing demand strong, lenders are pushing boundaries. As risky products return, borrowers should be cautious and not let clever marketing cloud their judgment.

Investment strategies

Dumb money triumphant

One sign of today's speculative market froth is that retail investors are winning, and winning big. It bears remarkable similarities to 1929 and 1999, and this story may not have a happy ending either.

Retirement

Can the sequence of investment returns ruin retirement?

Retirement outcomes aren’t just about average returns. The sequence of returns, good or bad, can dramatically shape how long super lasts. Understanding sequencing risk is key to managing longevity risk.

Strategy

How AI is changing search and what it means for Google

The use of generative AI in search is on the rise and has profound implications for search engines like Google, as well as for companies that rely on clicks to make sales.

Survey: Getting to know you, and your thoughts on Firstlinks

We’d love to get to know more about our readers, hear your thoughts on Firstlinks and see how we can make it better for you. Please complete this short survey, and have your say.

Investment strategies

A framework for understanding the AI investment boom

Technological leaps - from air travel to computing - has enriched society but squeezed margins. As AI accelerates, investors must separate progress from profitability to avoid repeating past mistakes.

Economy

The mystery behind modern spending choices

Today’s consumers are walking contradictions - craving simplicity in an age of abundance, privacy in a public world. These tensions tell a bigger story about what people truly value and why.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.