Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 212

Easier transfer of death benefit pensions

In my previous article, I discussed how a surviving spouse can receive a death benefit pension and how the new Transfer Balance Cap operates. This second article focusses on other features of death benefit pensions.

How is a death benefit pension taxed?

If the deceased or death benefit pension recipient was aged 60 and over, the recipient, for example a surviving spouse, receives the pension tax-free. If the deceased and the death benefit pension recipient were both under age 60, the pension is taxed as follows:

  • Tax-free component of pension - 0% tax.
  • Taxable component of pension – taxed at personal tax rates plus applicable levies such as Medicare less a 15% tax offset.

The 15% tax offset only applies while the pension is classified as a death benefit pension.

Can you transfer a death benefit pension to another fund?

To transfer any pension from one fund to another, you must stop or fully commute the pension back to accumulation phase, rollover the accumulation monies and commence a new pension in the new superannuation fund.

It is not uncommon for a surviving spouse to move their death benefit pension to another superannuation provider. The death benefit pension may be commenced or the pension may revert on death from an SMSF. If the surviving spouse does not wish to continue with the SMSF, they may transfer the pension to another non-SMSF provider. Under the previous rules, the surviving spouse had to wait until the expiration of the ‘death benefit period’ before affecting the transfer to the new superannuation fund, to avoid the nasty tax outcome.

However, even after waiting for the ‘death benefit period’ to pass, once the death benefit pension was transferred to the new fund and a new pension commenced, the new pension will have lost any link to being a death benefit pension. Consequently, if the surviving spouse was under age 60, the taxable component of the pension was assessable, but with no 15% tax offset.

How has the 1 July law change helped?

Prior to the new law starting on 1 July 2017, if a surviving spouse under age 60 elected to receive a lump sum death benefit payment, rather than a pension, they needed to fully commute the death benefit pension to a lump sum within the ‘death benefit period’, otherwise tax may have been levied.

From 1 July 2017, it is possible to roll over death benefit entitlements to other funds without having to wait for the expiration of the ‘death benefit period’. Once the amount has been rolled over it will continue to be recognised as a death benefit superannuation interest and must be used to commence an income stream from the recipient fund or cashed out as a lump sum. This allows a beneficiary to rollover a death benefit pension to a fund of their choice, including a SMSF. It retains the concessional tax treatment associated with a superannuation income stream death benefit (i.e. tax offset equal to 15% of the taxable component for those under age 60).

In effect, the ‘death benefit period’ was abolished from 1 July 2017. No longer will this period need to be taken into consideration when deciding on whether to fully commute a death benefit pension or transfer it to another superannuation fund. In essence, once a death benefit pension, always a death benefit pension. Further, the only way you can cease a death benefit pension is to commute it, either partially or fully and remove it entirely from the superannuation system as a lump sum benefit payment. That is, from 1 July 2017, you cannot commute a death benefit pension back to the accumulation account of the surviving spouse. However, as it will retain its character as a death benefit pension when commuted by a surviving spouse, the lump sum will be received 100% tax-free, no matter how long after the original member’s death or the age of the surviving spouse.

 

Mark Ellem is Executive Manager, SMSF Technical Services at SuperConcepts, a leading provider of innovative SMSF services, training and administration. This article is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   27 July 2017
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

When death benefits include life insurance

Limits to a will’s power over an SMSF

Want your loved ones to inherit your super? You can’t afford to skip this one step

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.