Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 16

Edition 16

  •   24 May 2013
  •      
  •   

Welcome from Chris Cuffe

On the surface, when you read Burton Malkiel’s views on investing, and mine on how I manage money for the Third Link Growth Fund, you’d think we are poles apart. Malkiel recommends index funds because the average active manager underperforms the market after fees, while I like to allocate money to particular active managers.

In fact, we have some common ground. I understand Malkiel’s point, that the sum of all active managers is the index less fees, and most professional managers do not consistently outperform. But even Malkiel admits he is not willing “to damn the entire field” of professional investors. He goes on to say in his book, “ … if there are exceptional financial managers, they are very rare.” It’s not that they don’t exist, they’re just not easy to identify. Malkiel also says that if he knew 40 years ago what he now knows about Warren Buffett, then of course he would have allocated some money to the man from Omaha. But who is the next Warren Buffett?

This is closer to my position. My time building Colonial First State supported by the exceptional investment skills of Greg Perry shows what is possible. In choosing Australian equity managers, I believe I can identify certain fund managers who will deliver out performance over time. This comes with risks and short-term stutters, which have to be accepted as part of the investing game, which is why I try to be patient with Third Link. But it’s not for everyone.

Continuing this theme, Towers Watson has provided an article with some amazing statistics on past performance. Mutual fund investors are so poor at ‘buy and hold’ that few people achieve close to the index as they chase higher yields. Be sure to take their quick quiz, which has some surprising answers. They conclude past performance is not even a reliable guide to the past. 

The founder and Chairman of IBISWorld, Phil Ruthven, is widely considered Australia’s top strategist and futurist on business and social matters, and we’re delighted he is writing for us, this week about retiring with dignity.

Chris

Latest posts from Cuffelinks, 24 May 2013, Edition 16

  • Introduction to best-selling author, Burton Malkiel Graham Hand
  • The Burton Malkiel Interview Graham Hand
  • How I manage the Third Link money Chris Cuffe
  • Retiring with dignity Phil Ruthven
  • Past returns are not even a reliable guide to the past Towers Watson

Download PDF

 

  •   24 May 2013
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.