Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 411

ETFs are the Marvel of listed galaxies, even with star WAR

The first Star Wars movie was released in 1977 to instant success, and A New Hope became the highest-grossing movie of its time due to its revolutionary visual effects. Star Wars soon established itself as a lucrative movie franchise for George Lucas, and he sold LucasFilm to Disney for US$4 billion in 2012. The Star Wars franchise now includes 12 movies with the most recent released in 2019.

For most of the 44 years since the start, Star Wars was the world’s biggest movie franchise, but it has been overwhelmed in recent years by the Marvel comic characters, or Marvel Cinematic Universe. With 23 movies including the record-breaking Avengers: Endgame, Marvel is now undoubtedly the most lucrative movie franchise ever, with Avengers movies catching up with Star Wars after only four movies.

Marvel is to ETFs as Star Wars is to LICs

It’s a similar battle between two types of listed vehicles: the Star Wars equivalent are the LICs and LITs (Listed Investments Companies and Listed Investment trusts) and for Marvel, it is Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). ETFs have come from a long way behind to usurp LICs as the dominant listed fund vehicles and their lead will increase from here.

LICs started first by a long way. Our early heroes commenced when Whitefield (WHF) was established in 1923. Australia’s largest LIC, AFIC (AFI), began in 1928 and changed to its current name in 1938. LICs were well on their way in a galaxy far away before Jack Bogle of Vanguard had any inkling about index funds.

The first ETFs listed in the US were SPDRs in 1993, benchmarked to the S&P500. ETFs did not make their way onto the Australian exchange until 2001 with S&P/ASX200 and S&P/ASX50 funds. LICs therefore had a start of about 70 years but the ETF empire has struck back.

Total outstandings of ETFs are now $107 billion while LICs/LITs are about $55 billion. The proportions are the same as Star Wars and Marvel, with one around double the other.

Sources: Statistica, ASX

A long time for Marvel and ETFs to become established

The Marvel movies were not significant successes until Disney acquired Marvel Entertainment in 2009. Marvel now reigns with a range of superheroes including Iron Man, Spider Man, Captain America, Thor, Black Panther, Ant Man and the Incredible Hulk.

ETFs also had a slow start from that first transaction in 2001, making little progress by the time the GFC came in 2008. LICs flourished while they had the support of financial advisers and handsome stamping fees paid by issuers. It was not until the end of 2018 that ETFs finally took over LICs, as shown below. ETFs have since become the avengers, sweeping LICs aside with the inclusion of a wide range of indexes, sectors and niche products, and a big boost from the Magellan active funds.

CAGR: Compound Annual Growth Rate. Source: ASX, Chi-X, BetaShares.

The LIC number disguises the fact that there have been no new transactions since 2019 and the growth is overwhelmingly due to stock markets rising to all-time highs. In fact, in the 12 months between April 2020 and March 2021, the number of LICs/LITs fell from 111 to 102 while the number of ETFs rose from 212 to 220.

There are many reasons why ETFs dominate:

  1. The rise of passive, low cost index ETFs.
  2. The broad acceptance of ETFs among advisers and investors after a decade of intense education by the likes of Vanguard, BetaShares, VanEck and iShares.
  3. The removal of the ability of LICs to pay stamping fees to brokers and advisers to push their products to their clients.
  4. The relatively poor investment experience of many LIC and LIT investors where issues traded at large discounts to the value of the underlying assets (Net Tangible Assets or NTA) whereas ETFs trade much closer to NTA.
  5. The development of Active ETFs, stealing the active management space once the domain of LICs.

The next generation of major investors is on the journey too. Rather than flocking to the Millennium Falcon, Millennials are flocking to ETFs.

It’s as if Chewy jumped to Marvel as some LICs switch

The problems with LICs and LITs trading at a discount became so acute that some managers have switched their LICs into either unlisted funds or Active ETF structures.

It’s as if Star Wars’ Chewbacca jumped out of Han Solo’s ship to become a Marvel character.

For example, two prominent LICs that gave up managing the discount to NTA discontent are Monash and Ellerston. On 10 May 2021, Monash’s MA1 shareholders voted to change the structure from a LIC to an Exchange Traded Managed Fund (ETMF). They will use a technique pioneered by Magellan with a dual registry structure which allows investors to buy and sell both on- and off-market.

Similarly, Ellerston Global Investments managed by well-known fund manager Ashok Jacob gave up its LIC structure in late 2019 and converted to an unlisted fund, immediately removing its material discount which Jacob had struggled with for years.

The following chart from Bell Potter shows historical premiums and discounts for LICs and LITs by market capitalisation. All segments have materially improved since the depths of COVID in April 2020 but the general discount to NTA problem continues, especially for small funds.

"I am your father" – but the new star WAR is not a LIC comeback

The father of LICs in Australia is Geoff Wilson of Wilson Asset Management (WAM), formed in 1997, well before any ETFs were listed in Australia. Wilson even calls his shareholders the 'Wilson Asset Family'. His own franchise of eight LICs includes a variety of sectors such as global, small cap, alternatives and large caps. Wilson’s business has thrived in the closed-end structure of LICs in a way none of the newer fund managers have come close to replicating.

If WAM were a movie, with its $4 billion in funds under management equivalent to gross takings at the box office, it would be in the same league as Jurassic Park and Lord of the Rings.

Wilson dominates public discourse on LICs although the largest LICs are the older structures such as AFIC (AFI, $9.2 billion) and Argo (ARG, $6.4 billion). He is currently in the market with the first new LIC since 2019 with WAM Strategic Value, which appropriately will trade on the exchange under the code WAR. WAR will target underperforming LICs which are trading at a discount to their NTA. Wilson talks of ‘buying $1 for 80 cents’ and there is no doubt he will raise his initial target of $225 million. 

But Wilson going to WAR is not a LIC resurgence to threaten the recent dominance of ETFs. Wilson is a unique beast in the LIC universe, as unlike other new LICs, he does not need stockbrokers or financial advisers to sell his funds.

WAM has nurtured a direct retail buyer base with its weekly newsletter now sent to over 50,000 subscribers. It can sell new issues, including regular share purchase plans, readily without the assistance of brokers. Such is Wilson's following that most of his LICs trade at premiums, and he has successfully taken over other LICs and removed most if not all their discounts. Recent examples include Perennial Value’s Wealth Defender (which did little to defend wealth) and the alternatives portfolio of Blue Sky. WAR does not signal new demand for LICs, but it is a continuation of successful strategies at WAM.

There is irony in Wilson benefitting from LICs struggling at a discount when he is the biggest promoter of the LIC structure.

Wilson has also gained a profile as a retail investor’s friend. He was at the forefront of the campaign against the evil empire, the Labor Party, and its proposal to deny refunds of franking credits at the last election. 

Another smaller LIC is coming from Salter Brothers Capital, an emerging companies issue for about $20 million. Salter specialises in unlisted assets including property, for which there is not a liquid market, and smaller companies, so it is suited to the permanent capital of a LIC. However, a $20 million transaction is more of a bit-part in a movie and hardly signs of a new franchise.

Prior to these two transactions, the previous LICs were in November 2019 with VGI’s VGI Partners Asian Investments Limited (VG8) and the KKR Credit Income Fund (KKC). KKC took a hammering in March 2020 and traded at less than 50% of its issue price, and VGI is facing considerable pressure from shareholder activists to convert to unlisted funds to remove persistent discounts, including on its larger flagship, VGI Partners Global Investments (VG1). VGI has responded by bringing in a new CEO, increasing its marketing activity, rolling out share buybacks and targeting a 4% annual dividend yield.


Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

The (New) Empire Strikes Back

Star Wars has millions of fans who adore the movies and know the stories intimately. Similarly, many of the long-term LICs such as AFIC, Argo, Milton (MLT, $3.3 billion) and Djerriwarth (DJW, $660 million) have traded tightly around NTA during their long histories and delivered strong and growing dividends. The charitable Hearts and Minds (HM1, $891 million) is likewise well-supported. Some assets are well-suited to closed-end structures where the underlying assets are less liquid, such as corporate loans (for example, Metrics, MXT, $1.5 billion), non-investment grade credit (for example, Neuberger Berman, NBI, $832 million) and private equity (for example, Bailador, BTI, $192 million).

But outside of institutional placements, share purchase plans and the special case of WAM, new issuers will struggle to find a market when so many quality LIC managers cannot hold their transactions at NTA. A genuine resurgence of new LICs looks some way off.

Meanwhile, the Marvel characters and ETFs roll on, and in the 12 months to April 2021, the following new flows were generated into ETFs:

  • Global equity, $12,026 million
  • Domestic equity, $6,529 million
  • Domestic fixed interest, $3,224 million
  • Commodities, $812 million
  • Global fixed interest, $730 million.

That’s $20 billion not including market rises. Luke Skywalker, Han Solo and Princess Leia may come flying across the limitless horizon but Iron Man and his fellow heroes are ready for them.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. The author owns some of the securities mentioned in this article.

 

17 Comments
Ramon Vasquez
July 22, 2021

Hello . Thanks for the article and all of the feedback .

If Sir Geoff were ever to change tack , he should , IMVHO , invent a super Lic through a combination of all of his funds into one . A Fund of Funds , if you will . l would not , as a long-term professional Tight-Wad , then mind so much his high performance fees .

Best wishes , Ramon .

Graham Wright
June 13, 2021

I am much grateful for the substantial profits I have made from selected LICs over past 15 years. I don't mind paying for professional help to grow my retirement funds. I don't mind sharing by leaving some crumbs on the table for others. It's the substantial growth of my investment returns that I spend in my retirement, not the miniscule fees I save by avoiding professionals. I am just cautious about who I choose to help me.

James
June 11, 2021

I continue to be bemused at the obsession with LIC's trading at a discount - apart from it being a reason and cause for predation. For the retail investor, a discount offers a tangible safety buffer to an LIC's intrinsic value. It also offers a clear potential for above average returns compared with purchase at NTA or a premium.
Consider the following, assuming similar yield payout from two similar-sized companies:
Company A: Trading at NTA
Market Cap. = $400m; NTA = $400m; Dividends from $400m portfolio @ 4% = $16m.

Company B: Trading at 20% discount
Market Cap. = $400m; NTA = $500m; Dividends from $500m portfolio @ 4% = $20m.
The clear beneficiaries are investors and therefore Management who've outperformed on at least one criterion.
An LIC at a premium reverses this advantage, other things being equal.

Simon (Luke Skywalker) Samuel
June 12, 2021

No one is going to be unhappy buying an asset for 80% of its value and collecting outsized yields as a result. The problem is that unless you are Palpatine (the Emperor of the Galactic Empire who seemingly lives forever) and so don’t ever need to sell those LICs, you are only going to get 80% of any capital appreciation the underlying fund investments make until such time as the discount narrows meaningful. Most of the time, you need to rescued by activists (the Force) to be able to crystallise the full capital gain.
Don’t forget that in the beginning, a long long time ago, those first investors in LICs paid 100% or more for those investments, and those people are not best pleased to be faced with having to sell at 80% of the value when they or their estate trustees need to sell out.

J Perks
June 10, 2021

Geoff Wilson has had a devoted following of investors for years, based on the performance of several of his LIC's. This has been cemented by him being the only investment professional who campaigned against Labour's proposed cancellation of franking credit refunds at the 2019 election, at some "political " risk to himself . Very well done, and thanks for your efforts Mr Wilson.

Ian Parker
July 10, 2021

Whilst we are investors in Wilson LIC's we are greatly disappointed his performance figures are before fees and costs, and understandably as those fees (MER) are at the high end of the range.

Marcel
June 10, 2021

It is also a pity it takes 2 weeks from the end of the month to report NTA, many other LIC/LIT funds report within a few days of month end, some weekly and some even daily.

Graham Wright
June 13, 2021

Perhaps we need to check facts. I am of opinion that the reported NTA at end of month is a calculated figure based on end of month data and thus should be accurate whereas more regular daily or weekly reports are estimates and thus not accurate but rather guides.

CC
June 10, 2021

interesting you say that there will be oversubscriptions in WAR, whereas Geoff said firmly that there will be none.

Bill Eye
July 08, 2021

No oversubscriptions? Issue was strongly supported which led to cut-backs. But Geoff managed to secure his 4M and left the considerable overhang to ensure support of the price on opening.
Bill

Alex
June 10, 2021

Love the "I am your father', and anyone who does not understand the reference can Google it. Geoff as Vader ...

Mark
June 13, 2021

Geoff Vader? From catering? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv5iEK-IEzw

Paul B
June 10, 2021

Many thanks for this interesting and informative article Graham. A movie buff you are. ??

Paul
June 10, 2021

Its a pity as the retail investors friend Geoff Wilson continues to quote pre-fee returns on his website in opposition to ASIC views on this.

Adrian
June 10, 2021

Yes I agree Paul. This seems to be justified by a footnote saying both portfolio and index returns are before expenses and fees. However, in reality you can invest in the index with a fee of 0.07% p.a. (e.g. A200 ETF) which is negligible, unlike the portfolio management plus perf. fees, which are well in excess of 1% p.a.

Sue
June 14, 2021

I am in total agreement with Paul about the poor transparency on Wilson fund results (he's not the only one, but the most visible.) Wilson will provide you with an "investment performance return" update a couple of days post their monthly releases if you are an investor in a fund, but theses are before all the considerable fees and expenses. Even the management fee quoted excludes some considerable administrative expenses. It's definitely buyer beware.
I would hazard a guess that a considerable number of Wilson investors wouldn't know how to calculate actual returns, and compare them to a relevant benchmark - and why should we anyway? It's time consuming, and how many funds do we have to do this on to narrow our choices?
Wilsons will direct you to the twice yearly reports to access their returns, but I find these figures, ensconced in text, and to be more complicated than necessary, particularly when the numbers don't look great.
It is very frustrating trying to invest in LICs. There's no standard reporting. I'm in the process of reducing my universe of LICs in whom I'm interested to those who report performances net of all fees and taxes. A lot of work to do this of course.
And, as per since most of the Wilson funds invest in listed entities, I can' believe it takes more than 2 weeks to churn out the NAV or any other calculation relating to the value of the fund.
As best I can work out, publicly available published tables presenting LIC returns are generally not independently calculated, so they are not particularly helpful. They are riddled with all these problems of inconsistency. Performance fees can make a huge difference, particularly in the last 12 months.
I too am more than happy to pay fees, but only if the net return beats the benchmark. Otherwise why feed a fund manager?
Unfortunately any attempt to get ASIC interested in looking after retail investors in regard to standardised reporting is likely to hit a brick wall, given retail investors won't have Geoff's back on this one.

Jodi
June 10, 2021

I thought the same https://einvest.com.au/insights/fixed-income-articles/the-5-cs-of-han-solos-credit/

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Finding opportunities in listed global funds

Latest LIC and ETF updates

Know your fund types and structures – an acronym odyssey

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

How to help people with retirement spending decisions

Super funds will soon be required to offer retirement income strategies for members in decumulation. With uncertain returns, uncertain timelines, and different goals, it's possibly “the hardest, nastiest problem in finance".

Tips when taking large withdrawals from super

You want to take a lump sum from your super, but what's the best way? Should it come from you or your spouse, or the pension or accumulation account. There is a welcome flexibility to select the best outcome.

Latest Updates

Interviews

John Woods on diversification using asset allocation

All fund managers now claim to take ESG factors into account, but a multi-asset ethical fund will look quite different from a mainstream fund. Faced with low fixed income returns, alternatives have a bigger role.

SMSF strategies

Don't believe the SMSF statistics on investment allocation

The ATO's data on SMSF asset allocation is as much as 27 months out-of-date and categories such as cash and global investments are reported incorrectly. We should question the motives of some who quote the numbers.

Investment strategies

Highlights of reader tips for young investors

In this second part on the reader responses with advice to younger people, we have selected a dozen highlights, but there are so many quality contributions that a full list of comments is also attached.

Investment strategies

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

Climate-related companies will experience exponential growth driven by consumer demand and government action. Investors who identify the right companies will benefit from four themes which will last decades.

Investment strategies

Inflation remains transitory due to strong long-term trends

There is momentum to stop calling inflation 'transitory' but this overlooks deep-seated trends. A longer-term view will see companies like ARB, Reece, Macquarie Telecom and CSL more valuable in a decade.

Infrastructure

Infrastructure and the road to recovery

Infrastructure assets experienced varying fortunes during the pandemic, from less travel at airports to strong activity in communications. On the road to recovery, what role does infrastructure play in a portfolio?

Economy

The three prices that everyone should worry about

Among the myriad of numbers that bombard us every day, three prices matter greatly to the world economy. Recent changes in these prices help to understand the potential for a global recovery and interest rates.

Shares

Why green hydrogen is central to achieving net zero

Hundreds of green hydrogen projects show this energy opportunity is finally being taken seriously. While a cost disadvantage and technical challenges need to be overcome, it promises to deliver a path to net zero.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.