Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 343

The fear of running out of money in retirement

In the middle of yet another review on superannuation, this time looking at the retirement income system, it is important to capture the views of the people the system is meant to help. Challenger has partnered with National Seniors Australia since 2012 to form a better understanding of how Australian retirees (and older Australians not yet retired) feel about life and their finances in retirement.

Lack of confidence in retirement

The latest report, Retirement Income Worry. Who worries and why? indicates that the system has more work to do to provide retirees with more confidence in retirement. The report found that most older Australians (53%) are worried about outliving their savings, with women (59%) more worried than men (47%).

This high level of worry contrasts with global comparisons that rate Australia as one of the best retirement income systems in the world. This isn’t simply a case of Australia being the best of a bad lot. The underlying issue is that despite the many strengths of Australia’s super system, people worry whether they have enough, particularly approaching retirement.

The report delves into the underlying factors leading to worry. Gender differences are significant. Women are more likely to worry about running out of money in retirement than men. And, by 'running out of money', people are talking about their super. While the age pension is a backstop for people who run out of super, respondents were worried that it might happen to them. Living solely on the age pension is viewed differently from having your own money to spend.

People with less than $500,000 were more likely to worry than those with more. There are more women with lower balances as a result of broken lifetime work patterns, part-time arrangements and the gender pay gap. The report also notes that women with higher balances were more likely to worry than men with the same balances.

Longevity differences not addressed

The difference in life expectancy could also impact the level of worry in women. On average, women live 2-3 years longer than men, and half the women who turn 66 in 2020 are likely to live into their nineties. The standard retirement income options in super don’t deal with this longevity and this seems to cause many to worry about their money running out.

It follows that retirees with a guaranteed source of income for life (from either a defined benefit pension or a lifetime annuity) were the least worried.

The evidence points to the need to improve the super system to keep it world-leading. The current government focus on designing better retirement income products will help as would other tweaks that haven’t received the same traction, such as removing the $450 threshold on compulsory super payments.

Better adjustment in retirement

On the positive side, once people retire, they report less worry. People tend to adjust to what they have and to actual retirement. It implies that some people are working only because they are worried about not having enough.

The survey also reinforces the idea that retirees know that super is for spending. Almost two-thirds of the respondents who had been retired for at least five years expect to spend most of their savings over the next 20 years. Super was created as a consumption-smoothing mechanism. Participants defer wages as a sacrifice during their working lives, so they are entitled to spend those unspent wages (compounded many times over) on themselves in retirement.

Summary of major results 

In brief, the degree of worry about retirement income was:

1. 68% higher in those not already retired. Previous work has indicated that people adjust to their actual circumstances in retirement, whether they planned for them or not.

2. 65% higher in those who have less than $500,000 in savings. This is as expected, since they may not have the money to pay for a ‘comfortable’ retirement.

3. 53% higher in those who expect their main source of income in retirement to be the age pension. This is expected because it is a minimum basic income with accompanying worry about ‘making do’.

4. 47% higher in women. This is after taking out the effects one or more of the previous three factors above and may be associated, in part, with expecting greater involvement in caring roles and a real risk of outliving their partners.

 

Jeremy Cooper is Chairman, Retirement Income, at Challenger. The full report can be downloaded from the National Seniors website.

 

5 Comments
Jeff O
February 06, 2020

The vast majority of retirees should not worry about running out of money or making do - especially those that own residential property. Currently, most retirees with residential property - die with 90% of their assets - over save and underspend during retirement and effectively make large bequests on death.

Arguably, the best financial strategy for the majority (the median) of retirees, with residential property that want additional income to spend or put aide for an unexpected financial emergency is the top up the govt's aged and/or private pension with the govt's pension loan scheme.

Retirees can add up to 1.5 times the aged pension - as a regular income stream (effectively, a private/public annuity - paid by the govt backed by the private savings/equity in your home). A couple with most of their private savings locked up in residential property can readily lift their income to a 'comfortable' level!

The income stream is capitalised at the administered rate of 4.5% - it's effectively a flexible reverse lifetime mortgage with very little equity or credit risk or longevity risk! The longevity risk can be managed by setting a low nominated loan amount, with the free govt option of regular reviews and even earlier repayment!

Of course, the PLS does not help retirees that do not own a home and/or an investment property. This needs other govt. policy action.

PS - It would also further increase retirement incomes and reduce worry for asset rich, income short retirees - if the Govt's pension loan rate was at a "market" rate - not 4.5% - arguably 3.5% currently - backed by efficient funding, effective delivery and disinterested advice!

Indeed, with scale (and scope), the PLS has the potential to be in the national interest - for jobs and growth - unlocking the voluntary savings in residential property, the biggest component of Pillar 3 - boosting the spending of older Australians and in turn creating jobs and growth for younger Australians.

Dave
February 07, 2020

Hi Jeff,
I agree and have come to the same conclusion regarding the PLS. My only issue relates to the 1.5 times the pension rate. I initially thought that it meant that I could borrow 1.5 times my pension, when in fact I can only borrow half of my current pension. I wish I could borrow more, and hopefully the Govt will increase the borrowing limit in the future,

regards Dave

Jeff O
February 06, 2020

The vast majority of retirees should not worry about running out of money or making do - especially those that own residential property. Currently, retirees with residential property - die with 90% of their assets - over save and underspend during retirement and effectively make large bequests on death.

Arguably, the best financial strategy for the majority (the median) of retirees, with residential property that are cash strapped but asset rich is the top up the govt's aged and/or private pension with the govt's pension loan.

Retirees can add up to 1.5 times the aged pension - as a regular income stream (effectively, a private/public annuity - paid by the govt backed by the private savings/equity in your home.). A couple with most of their private savings locked up in residential property can readily lift their income to a 'comfortable' level!

The income stream is capitalised at the administered rate of 4.5% - it's effectively a flexible reverse lifetime mortgage with very little equity or credit risk or longevity risk! The longevity risk can be managed by setting a low nominated loan amount, with the free govt option of regular reviews and even earlier repayment!

Of course, the PLS does not help retirees that do not own a home and/or an investment property. This needs other govt. policy action.

PS - It would also further increase retirement incomes and reduce worry for asset rich, income short retirees - if the pension loan rate was offered by the Govt at a "market" rate - arguably 3.5% currently - backed by efficient funding, effective delivery and disinterested advice!

Indeed, with scale (and scope), the PLS has the potential to be good for jobs and growth - unlocking the voluntary savings in residential property, the biggest component of Pillar 3 - boosting the spending of older Australians and in turn creating jobs and growth for younger Australians.

john
February 06, 2020

One sector sure has no fears of running out of money in retirement with all their high salaries, multiple perks, high pensions etc. That is the politicians !!

Aussie HIFIRE
February 06, 2020

None of this is particularly surprising news. People with less money worry more about running out of money. People who are reliant on the government are more worried because they're not in control of their main source of income. Women tend to have less super for a variety of reasons, and so they worry more than men. People who don't have much money figure they will spend most/all of it over the next 20 years.

Putting some numbers around all of this is nice, but really it's just confirmation of what you would assume anyway.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Schemes designed to deal with longevity risk

Overcoming loss aversion in retirement income

Summer Series, Guest Editor, Jeremy Cooper

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Have the rules of retirement investing changed?

In retirement, we still want to reduce stock volatility while generating cash flows. The two needs have not changed, but the reward expected in the old days from interest payments has gone. What should we do?

18 Aussie names for your watchlist

A Morningstar stock screener reveals a cross-section of companies with competitive advantages that are trading at material discounts to estimated value. This is a list of 18 highly-rated names worth watching.

Buffett and his warning about 'virtually certain' earnings

While many investors are happy to invest in any online companies, Warren Buffett focusses more on the quality of future growth, buying companies whose earnings are 'virtually certain' in 10 or 20 years from now.

Hamish Douglass on what really matters

Questions on the stock market/economy disconnect, how to focus long term, technology's growing role, income in a low-rate world, Modern Monetary Theory and endless debt and the tooth fairy.

Kate Howitt: investing lessons and avoiding the PIPO trade

Kate Howitt identifies the stocks she likes and the disappointments, gives context to the increasing role of retail investors, and explains why the market is more of a 'voting not weighing' machine than ever before.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 379

It is trite and obvious to say the future is uncertain, and while COVID-19 brings extra risks, markets are always unpredictable. However, investing conditions are now more difficult than ever, mainly because the defensive options for portfolios produce little income. We explore whether investing rules have changed with new input from Howard Marks.

  • 15 October 2020

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 381

There is a popular belief that retail investors do not even achieve index returns due to poor timing of investing and selling decisions. The theory is that they buy after markets rise as confidence grows, then sell in panic when markets fall, and miss the recovery. This 'buy high sell low' tendency loses the advantages of long-term investing and riding out the selloffs. But the evidence for this belief is not convincing.

  • 29 October 2020
Investment strategies

Gemma Dale: three ways 'retail' is not the dumb money

There is a popular view that retail investors panic when markets fall, but in the recent COVID selloff, they were waiting in cash for buying opportunities. What's equally interesting is the stocks they bought.

Investment strategies

Unlucky for some: 13 investment risks to check

Risk isn’t something to be avoided altogether. To achieve returns beyond the government bond rate, some level of risk must be accepted. Assessing which risks to take and calibrating them is the investor's challenge.

Responsible investing

Four reasons ESG investing continues to grow

Although Australian investors are among the most ESG-aware in the world, with the vast majority wanting responsible and ethical investments, there are still some misconceptions to dispel.

Shares

Why caution is needed in Aussie small companies

Over the last 20 years, smaller Australian listed companies have outperformed larger companies but with greater volatility. Following a strong run in the last six months, the smaller end is looking expensive.

Financial planning

The value of financial advice amid rise of retail investors

Financial advice has moved well beyond simply recommending investments, with five major components to quality advice. Helping clients avoid potentially disastrous mistakes is often underestimated.

Economy

The 2020 US presidential elections

The US is days away from a presidential election with major repercussions for economic policy and investments in the US and the world. Views from First Sentier Investors and BNP Paribas Asset Management.

SMSF strategies

Can your SMSF buy a retirement home for you now?

It sounds appealing to acquire a property now through your SMSF with the hope of residing in the property once you retire, but there are issues and costs to check that may vary by state.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.