Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 343

The fear of running out of money in retirement

In the middle of yet another review on superannuation, this time looking at the retirement income system, it is important to capture the views of the people the system is meant to help. Challenger has partnered with National Seniors Australia since 2012 to form a better understanding of how Australian retirees (and older Australians not yet retired) feel about life and their finances in retirement.

Lack of confidence in retirement

The latest report, Retirement Income Worry. Who worries and why? indicates that the system has more work to do to provide retirees with more confidence in retirement. The report found that most older Australians (53%) are worried about outliving their savings, with women (59%) more worried than men (47%).

This high level of worry contrasts with global comparisons that rate Australia as one of the best retirement income systems in the world. This isn’t simply a case of Australia being the best of a bad lot. The underlying issue is that despite the many strengths of Australia’s super system, people worry whether they have enough, particularly approaching retirement.

The report delves into the underlying factors leading to worry. Gender differences are significant. Women are more likely to worry about running out of money in retirement than men. And, by 'running out of money', people are talking about their super. While the age pension is a backstop for people who run out of super, respondents were worried that it might happen to them. Living solely on the age pension is viewed differently from having your own money to spend.

People with less than $500,000 were more likely to worry than those with more. There are more women with lower balances as a result of broken lifetime work patterns, part-time arrangements and the gender pay gap. The report also notes that women with higher balances were more likely to worry than men with the same balances.

Longevity differences not addressed

The difference in life expectancy could also impact the level of worry in women. On average, women live 2-3 years longer than men, and half the women who turn 66 in 2020 are likely to live into their nineties. The standard retirement income options in super don’t deal with this longevity and this seems to cause many to worry about their money running out.

It follows that retirees with a guaranteed source of income for life (from either a defined benefit pension or a lifetime annuity) were the least worried.

The evidence points to the need to improve the super system to keep it world-leading. The current government focus on designing better retirement income products will help as would other tweaks that haven’t received the same traction, such as removing the $450 threshold on compulsory super payments.

Better adjustment in retirement

On the positive side, once people retire, they report less worry. People tend to adjust to what they have and to actual retirement. It implies that some people are working only because they are worried about not having enough.

The survey also reinforces the idea that retirees know that super is for spending. Almost two-thirds of the respondents who had been retired for at least five years expect to spend most of their savings over the next 20 years. Super was created as a consumption-smoothing mechanism. Participants defer wages as a sacrifice during their working lives, so they are entitled to spend those unspent wages (compounded many times over) on themselves in retirement.

Summary of major results 

In brief, the degree of worry about retirement income was:

1. 68% higher in those not already retired. Previous work has indicated that people adjust to their actual circumstances in retirement, whether they planned for them or not.

2. 65% higher in those who have less than $500,000 in savings. This is as expected, since they may not have the money to pay for a ‘comfortable’ retirement.

3. 53% higher in those who expect their main source of income in retirement to be the age pension. This is expected because it is a minimum basic income with accompanying worry about ‘making do’.

4. 47% higher in women. This is after taking out the effects one or more of the previous three factors above and may be associated, in part, with expecting greater involvement in caring roles and a real risk of outliving their partners.

 

Jeremy Cooper is Chairman, Retirement Income, at Challenger. The full report can be downloaded from the National Seniors website.

 

5 Comments
Jeff O
February 06, 2020

The vast majority of retirees should not worry about running out of money or making do - especially those that own residential property. Currently, most retirees with residential property - die with 90% of their assets - over save and underspend during retirement and effectively make large bequests on death.

Arguably, the best financial strategy for the majority (the median) of retirees, with residential property that want additional income to spend or put aide for an unexpected financial emergency is the top up the govt's aged and/or private pension with the govt's pension loan scheme.

Retirees can add up to 1.5 times the aged pension - as a regular income stream (effectively, a private/public annuity - paid by the govt backed by the private savings/equity in your home). A couple with most of their private savings locked up in residential property can readily lift their income to a 'comfortable' level!

The income stream is capitalised at the administered rate of 4.5% - it's effectively a flexible reverse lifetime mortgage with very little equity or credit risk or longevity risk! The longevity risk can be managed by setting a low nominated loan amount, with the free govt option of regular reviews and even earlier repayment!

Of course, the PLS does not help retirees that do not own a home and/or an investment property. This needs other govt. policy action.

PS - It would also further increase retirement incomes and reduce worry for asset rich, income short retirees - if the Govt's pension loan rate was at a "market" rate - not 4.5% - arguably 3.5% currently - backed by efficient funding, effective delivery and disinterested advice!

Indeed, with scale (and scope), the PLS has the potential to be in the national interest - for jobs and growth - unlocking the voluntary savings in residential property, the biggest component of Pillar 3 - boosting the spending of older Australians and in turn creating jobs and growth for younger Australians.

Dave
February 07, 2020

Hi Jeff,
I agree and have come to the same conclusion regarding the PLS. My only issue relates to the 1.5 times the pension rate. I initially thought that it meant that I could borrow 1.5 times my pension, when in fact I can only borrow half of my current pension. I wish I could borrow more, and hopefully the Govt will increase the borrowing limit in the future,

regards Dave

Jeff O
February 06, 2020

The vast majority of retirees should not worry about running out of money or making do - especially those that own residential property. Currently, retirees with residential property - die with 90% of their assets - over save and underspend during retirement and effectively make large bequests on death.

Arguably, the best financial strategy for the majority (the median) of retirees, with residential property that are cash strapped but asset rich is the top up the govt's aged and/or private pension with the govt's pension loan.

Retirees can add up to 1.5 times the aged pension - as a regular income stream (effectively, a private/public annuity - paid by the govt backed by the private savings/equity in your home.). A couple with most of their private savings locked up in residential property can readily lift their income to a 'comfortable' level!

The income stream is capitalised at the administered rate of 4.5% - it's effectively a flexible reverse lifetime mortgage with very little equity or credit risk or longevity risk! The longevity risk can be managed by setting a low nominated loan amount, with the free govt option of regular reviews and even earlier repayment!

Of course, the PLS does not help retirees that do not own a home and/or an investment property. This needs other govt. policy action.

PS - It would also further increase retirement incomes and reduce worry for asset rich, income short retirees - if the pension loan rate was offered by the Govt at a "market" rate - arguably 3.5% currently - backed by efficient funding, effective delivery and disinterested advice!

Indeed, with scale (and scope), the PLS has the potential to be good for jobs and growth - unlocking the voluntary savings in residential property, the biggest component of Pillar 3 - boosting the spending of older Australians and in turn creating jobs and growth for younger Australians.

john
February 06, 2020

One sector sure has no fears of running out of money in retirement with all their high salaries, multiple perks, high pensions etc. That is the politicians !!

Aussie HIFIRE
February 06, 2020

None of this is particularly surprising news. People with less money worry more about running out of money. People who are reliant on the government are more worried because they're not in control of their main source of income. Women tend to have less super for a variety of reasons, and so they worry more than men. People who don't have much money figure they will spend most/all of it over the next 20 years.

Putting some numbers around all of this is nice, but really it's just confirmation of what you would assume anyway.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Schemes designed to deal with longevity risk

Overcoming loss aversion in retirement income

Summer Series, Guest Editor, Jeremy Cooper

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.