Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 92

A fund manager’s perspective on ASX’s mFund

In September 2014, the ASX launched its new Managed Fund Settlement Service (mFund) initiative. mFund enables investors to buy and sell units in unlisted managed funds through an ASX broker. The service replaces traditional paper-based processes and uses the same electronic system (CHESS) as for settling ASX share transactions. There are many expected benefits for investors, including diversification, efficiency, convenience, and speed.

Expectation of a ‘slow burn’

Ibbotson decided to participate from the start because developing multiple ways to access our products puts investors in control, opening a wide range of professionally-managed investments in a way that works best for them. We’re confident investors will embrace this way of investing in managed funds, enjoying the same paperless investment experience they have with share trading.

The ASX’s marketing strategy is focused towards its large and engaged following of self-directed investors who seek the control and efficiency that mFund has been designed to offer. We consider this channel to be distinct from investors who engage with a financial adviser.

Our expectations are realistic and it’s our belief that mFund will be a relatively slow burn. But what new investment initiative takes off overnight? Managed accounts have been available in Australia for well over a decade, and have only recently gained meaningful traction. It’s a similar story for Exchange Traded Funds.

Ibbotson received flows as soon as the initiative launched, so our initial experience has been positive. We’ve also supported the ASX’s marketing efforts by participating in a national road show with events for both advisers and investors. This was an opportunity to gather valuable information about the type of investors most interested in mFund. This insight will enable us to enhance our marketing and distribution plans to leverage the momentum of the launch.

Sorting out the technology issues

Becoming a foundation member was a learning curve for all involved. From a technology perspective, the key decision was whether to build an in-house CHESS interface based on CHESS open interface specifications, allowing us to act as a Product Issuer Settlement Participant (PISP), or whether to engage with an external service provider to act as our PISP. We chose the outsourcing route, leveraging the existing CHESS interface of our chosen service provider, MainstreamBPO. This reduced the technology burden significantly.

We settled on the sub-registrar model for integrating mFund into our existing operational processes. As part of its PISP role, MainstreamBPO maintains a sub-register of all investors accessing our products through mFund. MainstreamBPO aggregates transactions originating through mFund and pushes these through to our master registry. We adopted this model with little or no disruption to our existing unit pricing and investment administration processes.

We also had to make minor adjustments to the Product Disclosure Statements for the funds offered through the mFund service, as well as implement additional reporting capabilities to the ASX before going live. Future participants will benefit from the issues resolution foundation members have been through with the ASX and the various PISPs.

With brokers responsible for ‘know your client’ checks and our PISP, MainstreamBPO, responsible for processing applications, our role is to invest the application monies. This has not generated hard cost savings, but has produced efficiency gains.

Why are some brokers and fund managers not involved?

As more investors take control of their investments, particularly via SMSFs, they’ll look for easy and cost effective ways to access investment solutions which diversify their portfolios. mFund provides savings for investors, enabling them to avoid wraps and platform administration fees.

It’s stating the obvious that those fund managers with aligned platforms and wraps have not yet embraced mFund. They have an established distribution channel to their target audience, and so are in a position where they can wait, watch, and monitor flows. Similarly, a key determinant of mFund’s success will be the extent to which investors demand the mFund capability from their online brokers.

A bigger pull (or push) factor will be needed to attract these players, which will take time to play out.

 

Helena Hill is Product and Communications Manager at Ibbotson Associates.

 

  •   12 December 2014
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Is Magellan's listed fund a game changer?

Take my money and lie to me… again

ASA’s view on the banning of LIC commissions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.