Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 92

A fund manager’s perspective on ASX’s mFund

In September 2014, the ASX launched its new Managed Fund Settlement Service (mFund) initiative. mFund enables investors to buy and sell units in unlisted managed funds through an ASX broker. The service replaces traditional paper-based processes and uses the same electronic system (CHESS) as for settling ASX share transactions. There are many expected benefits for investors, including diversification, efficiency, convenience, and speed.

Expectation of a ‘slow burn’

Ibbotson decided to participate from the start because developing multiple ways to access our products puts investors in control, opening a wide range of professionally-managed investments in a way that works best for them. We’re confident investors will embrace this way of investing in managed funds, enjoying the same paperless investment experience they have with share trading.

The ASX’s marketing strategy is focused towards its large and engaged following of self-directed investors who seek the control and efficiency that mFund has been designed to offer. We consider this channel to be distinct from investors who engage with a financial adviser.

Our expectations are realistic and it’s our belief that mFund will be a relatively slow burn. But what new investment initiative takes off overnight? Managed accounts have been available in Australia for well over a decade, and have only recently gained meaningful traction. It’s a similar story for Exchange Traded Funds.

Ibbotson received flows as soon as the initiative launched, so our initial experience has been positive. We’ve also supported the ASX’s marketing efforts by participating in a national road show with events for both advisers and investors. This was an opportunity to gather valuable information about the type of investors most interested in mFund. This insight will enable us to enhance our marketing and distribution plans to leverage the momentum of the launch.

Sorting out the technology issues

Becoming a foundation member was a learning curve for all involved. From a technology perspective, the key decision was whether to build an in-house CHESS interface based on CHESS open interface specifications, allowing us to act as a Product Issuer Settlement Participant (PISP), or whether to engage with an external service provider to act as our PISP. We chose the outsourcing route, leveraging the existing CHESS interface of our chosen service provider, MainstreamBPO. This reduced the technology burden significantly.

We settled on the sub-registrar model for integrating mFund into our existing operational processes. As part of its PISP role, MainstreamBPO maintains a sub-register of all investors accessing our products through mFund. MainstreamBPO aggregates transactions originating through mFund and pushes these through to our master registry. We adopted this model with little or no disruption to our existing unit pricing and investment administration processes.

We also had to make minor adjustments to the Product Disclosure Statements for the funds offered through the mFund service, as well as implement additional reporting capabilities to the ASX before going live. Future participants will benefit from the issues resolution foundation members have been through with the ASX and the various PISPs.

With brokers responsible for ‘know your client’ checks and our PISP, MainstreamBPO, responsible for processing applications, our role is to invest the application monies. This has not generated hard cost savings, but has produced efficiency gains.

Why are some brokers and fund managers not involved?

As more investors take control of their investments, particularly via SMSFs, they’ll look for easy and cost effective ways to access investment solutions which diversify their portfolios. mFund provides savings for investors, enabling them to avoid wraps and platform administration fees.

It’s stating the obvious that those fund managers with aligned platforms and wraps have not yet embraced mFund. They have an established distribution channel to their target audience, and so are in a position where they can wait, watch, and monitor flows. Similarly, a key determinant of mFund’s success will be the extent to which investors demand the mFund capability from their online brokers.

A bigger pull (or push) factor will be needed to attract these players, which will take time to play out.

 

Helena Hill is Product and Communications Manager at Ibbotson Associates.

 

  •   12 December 2014
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Is Magellan's listed fund a game changer?

Take my money and lie to me… again

ASA’s view on the banning of LIC commissions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.