Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 92

A fund manager’s perspective on ASX’s mFund

In September 2014, the ASX launched its new Managed Fund Settlement Service (mFund) initiative. mFund enables investors to buy and sell units in unlisted managed funds through an ASX broker. The service replaces traditional paper-based processes and uses the same electronic system (CHESS) as for settling ASX share transactions. There are many expected benefits for investors, including diversification, efficiency, convenience, and speed.

Expectation of a ‘slow burn’

Ibbotson decided to participate from the start because developing multiple ways to access our products puts investors in control, opening a wide range of professionally-managed investments in a way that works best for them. We’re confident investors will embrace this way of investing in managed funds, enjoying the same paperless investment experience they have with share trading.

The ASX’s marketing strategy is focused towards its large and engaged following of self-directed investors who seek the control and efficiency that mFund has been designed to offer. We consider this channel to be distinct from investors who engage with a financial adviser.

Our expectations are realistic and it’s our belief that mFund will be a relatively slow burn. But what new investment initiative takes off overnight? Managed accounts have been available in Australia for well over a decade, and have only recently gained meaningful traction. It’s a similar story for Exchange Traded Funds.

Ibbotson received flows as soon as the initiative launched, so our initial experience has been positive. We’ve also supported the ASX’s marketing efforts by participating in a national road show with events for both advisers and investors. This was an opportunity to gather valuable information about the type of investors most interested in mFund. This insight will enable us to enhance our marketing and distribution plans to leverage the momentum of the launch.

Sorting out the technology issues

Becoming a foundation member was a learning curve for all involved. From a technology perspective, the key decision was whether to build an in-house CHESS interface based on CHESS open interface specifications, allowing us to act as a Product Issuer Settlement Participant (PISP), or whether to engage with an external service provider to act as our PISP. We chose the outsourcing route, leveraging the existing CHESS interface of our chosen service provider, MainstreamBPO. This reduced the technology burden significantly.

We settled on the sub-registrar model for integrating mFund into our existing operational processes. As part of its PISP role, MainstreamBPO maintains a sub-register of all investors accessing our products through mFund. MainstreamBPO aggregates transactions originating through mFund and pushes these through to our master registry. We adopted this model with little or no disruption to our existing unit pricing and investment administration processes.

We also had to make minor adjustments to the Product Disclosure Statements for the funds offered through the mFund service, as well as implement additional reporting capabilities to the ASX before going live. Future participants will benefit from the issues resolution foundation members have been through with the ASX and the various PISPs.

With brokers responsible for ‘know your client’ checks and our PISP, MainstreamBPO, responsible for processing applications, our role is to invest the application monies. This has not generated hard cost savings, but has produced efficiency gains.

Why are some brokers and fund managers not involved?

As more investors take control of their investments, particularly via SMSFs, they’ll look for easy and cost effective ways to access investment solutions which diversify their portfolios. mFund provides savings for investors, enabling them to avoid wraps and platform administration fees.

It’s stating the obvious that those fund managers with aligned platforms and wraps have not yet embraced mFund. They have an established distribution channel to their target audience, and so are in a position where they can wait, watch, and monitor flows. Similarly, a key determinant of mFund’s success will be the extent to which investors demand the mFund capability from their online brokers.

A bigger pull (or push) factor will be needed to attract these players, which will take time to play out.

 

Helena Hill is Product and Communications Manager at Ibbotson Associates.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Is Magellan's listed fund a game changer?

ASA’s view on the banning of LIC commissions

Five features of a fair performance fee, including a holiday

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.