Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 273

Garry Weaven on 5 areas of super investment

[Introduction: Garry Weaven chairs IFM Investors, a fund manager owned by 27 industry superannuation funds with over $100 billion in assets under management. This article reports on his presentation at the 2018 Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees' Super Investment Conference in Cairns on 5 September 2018].

Garry Weaven started with a slide showing superannuation assets will grow from the current $2.6 trillion to $6 trillion in 2030, a more than doubling in size, while GDP would increase from $1.3 trillion to $1.9 trillion. It demonstrated super’s growing role in the Australian economy. Said Weaven:

“The business community and governments of any persuasion would be totally mad looking at those numbers not to pursue greater collaboration with super funds.”

He then identified five areas of potential growth for superannuation investment:

  • Corporate debt
  • Infrastructure
  • Residential property/affordable/social housing
  • Agriculture
  • Growing new industries

Edited transcript of Weaven's future focus on these five areas

"Generally speaking, the corporate debt field has been left to the big banks and their large credit assessment teams but the changing regulatory environment is restricting bank balance sheets from fully servicing that sector. They will focus more on lower risk or higher profit businesses. This will expand opportunities for our sector to step in, possibly in partnership with the banks. Something like $95 billion per annum is lent to non-financial corporations from the banking sector each year. It’s potentially very big business that can be addressed by us.

Second on infrastructure, almost everyone agrees we could spend hundreds of millions over the next decade if we could get the correct frameworks in place. I’ve been arguing there is a better way, a partnership approach between governments and the superannuation sector where a bargain will occur in a very transparent way about the target rate of return on particular projects with risks allocated between the parties. There would be a ceiling above which the taxpayers would share in any outperformance. The manager should not make windfall profits. The deal once negotiated would be offered to every registered superannuation fund in Australia.

Third on residential property, the first investment ever made by IFM Investors' predecessor was to assist people into affordable housing. In the thousands of seminars since, housing and affordability has got worse. It’s time something was done.

Fourth, some of you will have noticed rural politicians squawking about agriculture, lamenting the fact that superannuation funds were not investing more. The reason is very simple: the returns are very poor and the volatility is substantial due to commodity prices and drought. The reason large offshore investors are able to come in here and invest in a significant way is because they can participate in the margins of the downstream processing or distributions of the agricultural output in the destination markets – China or Canada or wherever it is. If the government wants to do something useful in the area, it should be using its trade and foreign affairs diplomacy to broker deals where the super sector could partner with some of those organisations so the returns would be more attractive.

The fifth thing is industry policy generally. A really bold view would include governments collaborating with the super industry in the development of proactive industry policy."

Weaven called for a new era of cooperation between industry funds and the Coalition:

“Over 35 years of history in the industry fund movement, we’ve hardly had a year go by where there hasn’t been some attack in one form or another from the Coalition, in either government or opposition. There could be an emergence of an opportunity for all of that conflict and opposition to finally turn to collaboration, at least to some degree, between the business community, the super sector and governments – both state and federal.”


Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks. Garry Weaven is Chair of IFM Investors. As ACTU Assistant Secretary in the 1980s, he played a seminal role in the development of the industry superannuation fund movement.



Two Labor policies facing inadequate scrutiny

Super boost: more flexibility for retirement

Super wishlist: what the industry hoped for


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.