Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 273

Garry Weaven on 5 areas of super investment

[Introduction: Garry Weaven chairs IFM Investors, a fund manager owned by 27 industry superannuation funds with over $100 billion in assets under management. This article reports on his presentation at the 2018 Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees' Super Investment Conference in Cairns on 5 September 2018].


Garry Weaven started with a slide showing superannuation assets will grow from the current $2.6 trillion to $6 trillion in 2030, a more than doubling in size, while GDP would increase from $1.3 trillion to $1.9 trillion. It demonstrated super’s growing role in the Australian economy. Said Weaven:

“The business community and governments of any persuasion would be totally mad looking at those numbers not to pursue greater collaboration with super funds.”

He then identified five areas of potential growth for superannuation investment:

  • Corporate debt
  • Infrastructure
  • Residential property/affordable/social housing
  • Agriculture
  • Growing new industries

Edited transcript of Weaven's future focus on these five areas

"Generally speaking, the corporate debt field has been left to the big banks and their large credit assessment teams but the changing regulatory environment is restricting bank balance sheets from fully servicing that sector. They will focus more on lower risk or higher profit businesses. This will expand opportunities for our sector to step in, possibly in partnership with the banks. Something like $95 billion per annum is lent to non-financial corporations from the banking sector each year. It’s potentially very big business that can be addressed by us.

Second on infrastructure, almost everyone agrees we could spend hundreds of millions over the next decade if we could get the correct frameworks in place. I’ve been arguing there is a better way, a partnership approach between governments and the superannuation sector where a bargain will occur in a very transparent way about the target rate of return on particular projects with risks allocated between the parties. There would be a ceiling above which the taxpayers would share in any outperformance. The manager should not make windfall profits. The deal once negotiated would be offered to every registered superannuation fund in Australia.

Third on residential property, the first investment ever made by IFM Investors' predecessor was to assist people into affordable housing. In the thousands of seminars since, housing and affordability has got worse. It’s time something was done.

Fourth, some of you will have noticed rural politicians squawking about agriculture, lamenting the fact that superannuation funds were not investing more. The reason is very simple: the returns are very poor and the volatility is substantial due to commodity prices and drought. The reason large offshore investors are able to come in here and invest in a significant way is because they can participate in the margins of the downstream processing or distributions of the agricultural output in the destination markets – China or Canada or wherever it is. If the government wants to do something useful in the area, it should be using its trade and foreign affairs diplomacy to broker deals where the super sector could partner with some of those organisations so the returns would be more attractive.

The fifth thing is industry policy generally. A really bold view would include governments collaborating with the super industry in the development of proactive industry policy."

Weaven called for a new era of cooperation between industry funds and the Coalition:

“Over 35 years of history in the industry fund movement, we’ve hardly had a year go by where there hasn’t been some attack in one form or another from the Coalition, in either government or opposition. There could be an emergence of an opportunity for all of that conflict and opposition to finally turn to collaboration, at least to some degree, between the business community, the super sector and governments – both state and federal.”

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks. Garry Weaven is Chair of IFM Investors. As ACTU Assistant Secretary in the 1980s, he played a seminal role in the development of the industry superannuation fund movement.

 

  •   26 September 2018
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

Two Labor policies facing inadequate scrutiny

Super boost: more flexibility for retirement

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.