Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 294

Global ETFs: insights into a multi-trillion-dollar industry

We recently launched the first edition of the quarterly BetaShares Global ETF Review to analyse key trends and developments in the industry outside Australia. Looking at more mature ETF markets globally gives insights into the potential future for the Australian market. The global review complements our monthly Australian-focused publication on the local ETF industry.

The full report is available for download, but I’ve captured key highlights below.

Index strategies dominate investor preferences

The global ETF industry ended 2018 at US$4.8 trillion in assets under management (AuM), posting a robust annual growth rate of 20% since 2005. The strength of ETFs can be largely explained by the growing preference for passive strategies, which still dominate the global ETF space. More broadly, unlisted funds (known as ‘mutual funds’ in the US) are also evidencing a tilt towards passive strategies. In the US in 2018, passive funds (including traditional unlisted mutual funds and passive ETFs) attracted net inflows of US$431 billion. In comparison, active mutual funds in the US reported net outflows of US$418 billion, the highest level of annual outflows for this category on record.

The chart below illustrates the trend away from traditional active mutual funds. Since 2012, there have been net inflows into Active ETFs as well as passive ETFs, indicating investor preferences for the ETF structure whether or not the underlying investments are actively or passively managed.

Source: Bloomberg.

Investor preferences are perhaps even more strikingly evidenced in the chart of U.S. equities mutual fund v ETF flows. With both categories including passive and active strategies, the investor trend towards the ETF product wrapper is clear.

Source: Bloomberg.

Compared to larger and more mature markets, such as the US and Canada, Australia sits behind in terms of net inflows and size. Putting the size of the Australian industry in context, in the US, ETFs represent about 16% of the size of the broader mutual fund industry. In Australia, the penetration is far smaller, at about 1.5%. While recent local growth has been fast, we believe Australian investors are just starting to scratch the surface when it comes to ETF usage.

Who owns the sharemarket? Not ETFs

The popularity of ETFs has raised concerns that they are fuelling sharemarket volatility. These fears are unfounded. The graph below for 2018 data compares the flows of U.S. equity ETFs traded in the US versus the performance of the S&P 500 Index. Market moves were entirely independent from flows into and out of ETFs.

Source: Bloomberg

December 2018, for example, saw a strong market decline despite the positive inflows to ETFs. Saying ETFs can move markets makes little sense. They are designed to replicate what their underlying securities do. Nothing more, nothing less.

ESG and smart beta on the rise

Two of the key trends observed by our research are the rise of ESG/ethically-orientated products and smart beta strategies.

In the U.S. last year, ESG ETF AuM grew by 26% year-on-year, while inflows grew even more rapidly with a 57% annual growth. Smart beta exchange-traded products weight shares in portfolios based on a methodology other than market capitalisation. Between 2009 to 2018, flows into smart beta strategies experienced a compounded annual growth rate of 60%, reaching a record high of US$86 billion in 2018.

As the popularisation and sophistication of the ETF industry and of investors around the world continue to grow, we predict the uptake of funds with differing methodologies to continue to be adopted. The cost-effectiveness, transparency and accessibility offered by ETFs makes them appealing for all investor types, whether an institutional asset allocator, a financial adviser, a high net worth individual, or a millennial who is just starting to build an investment portfolio.

 

Ilan Israelstam is Head of Strategy and Marketing at BetaShares, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This material has been prepared as general information only, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should seek your own financial advice before making any investment decision.

For more articles and papers from BetaShares, please click here.

RELATED ARTICLES

$100 billion! Five reasons investors are flocking to ETFs

Thematic exposure to global trends using ASX

Australian ETFs: end of year reviews 2018

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.