Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 222

Meeting investor needs with human capital reporting

The disruptive effects of technological change occupy a lot of space in the business press, and for good reason. Investment markets have witnessed significant value destruction in sectors exposed to disruption over the past 15 years, and there is much more to come with rapid advances in automation, big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. Some commentators describe these forces as combining to create a Fourth Industrial Revolution, with profound implications for businesses.

Few companies or industries will escape investor scrutiny as technology-enabled business models proliferate to compete with incumbents. In this rapidly changing business landscape, the information available to understand risks and opportunities is increasingly inadequate for investors to develop informed views on a company’s future prospects. Can companies protect existing products from new online competitors? Can they adapt their business models to grow new markets? These are the types of questions investors continue to struggle with.

How are people managed in the face of disruption?

Rarely are we adequately told how people are managed and organised strategically to respond to risks and opportunities from disruption. Technology is only one response to disruption. Disclosure of human capital management falls well short of market needs, especially viewed from the perspective of investors seeking to gain insights into a company’s future prospects. Where human capital reporting is absent and strategic human capital risks are material, companies may not be meeting their disclosure requirements.

For the majority of companies, a significant portion of company value is deeply connected to its people, through intangible value. This under-recognised proportion of corporate value has grown with the decline of manufacturing in OECD economies and increasing representation of service-oriented businesses, technology and finance. Today, the majority of value is held in intellectual property, brands, and people. It follows that investors need information beyond that available in financial accounts to inform invest decisions.

Companies should explain more effectively how they are applying people to maximise long-term value. Companies with superior management and advanced communication of their people strategies should be rewarded in investment markets, or should be less severely punished where businesses are highly exposed to disruptive forces.

The biggest challenge to improving human capital disclosure is joining up relevant human capital information with corporate strategies and actions. It’s common practice to disclose metrics on employee engagement or employee turnover at highly aggregated levels, which may be meaningless. Such disclosures have limited value to investors seeking to understand, for example, how a company is positioned to respond to disruptive risks and opportunities in its markets.

Addressing reporting gaps

Fortunately, Australian listed companies have an existing structure to frame investor-focused human capital disclosure in annual reports through the Operating and Financial Review (OFR). OFR reporting requirements were introduced in Australia about five years ago. It’s not a big leap to see multiple linkages here to human capital, where delivery of strategy requires significant organisational restructuring, retention of key people, or acquisition of skill sets in high demand. Human capital linkages are also apparent in other OFR reporting areas including operational status, prospects and risks.

A leading example is Primary Health Care (ASX:PRY), whose business success relies fundamentally on attraction and retention of health care professionals (HCPs) to achieve targeted return on capital invested in its medical centre, pathology and imaging service assets. Primary discloses material information in the OFR on strategic changes to HCP contractual arrangements designed to improve attraction and retention of HCPs, HCP expenditure trends, and tailored metrics on HCP attraction and retention rates for exposed business segments. Such reporting remains the exception in the ASX however, hence there is significant scope to extend and improve human capital disclosure.

Restructuring in response to disruption

Rather than an additional reporting burden, human capital disclosure is an opportunity to give greater confidence to investors about future prospects. This is especially the case where business models are vulnerable to disruption, and human capital led responses are required to engender greater workplace agility and flexibility. For example, ANZ divulged that it would comprehensively restructure its work organisation by removing hierarchies and bureaucracy, adopting organisational structures akin to those in fast-moving tech companies as a direct response to disruption risks.

Disclosure approaches to communicate fundamental human capital reorganisation on this scale is only beginning to emerge. For example, how do workforce reorganisation strategies integrate with business strategies? How is ongoing operational delivery affected by the reorganisation of human capital for product groups? What are the key human capital-related risks to execution of workforce strategies? How is progress on execution of human capital strategies measured? What bearing is human capital management likely to have on future prospects?

If you were to survey experienced investors, most would say that financial data provides a limited picture of corporate health and investment attractiveness. Most analysts achieve a more complete picture by analysing industry structure, and gaining comfort with the quality of company management, for example. Enhanced disclosure of human capital management fills information gaps to round out assessment of outlook.

Advancing meaningful human capital disclosure is a less onerous task where corporates are some way down the track of integrating their strategic and human resource functions. The opportunity to link with investor relations to improve reporting outcomes should be apparent, and the task should be one of making a case for greater integration of human capital strategies and actions in reporting. This is clearly a bigger hill to climb where HR functions are siloed or disconnected from other functions. If the company is highly exposed to disruption and management actions to address risks are poorly communicated, the market will make the case.


Pauline Vamos is CEO of Regnan Governance Research & Engagement. She was CEO of the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) between 2007 and 2016.


Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require super funds - even SMSFs - to address retirement income and protect longevity risk.

Among key trends in Australian banks, one factor stands out

The Big Four banks look similar but they are at fundamentally different stages as they move to simpler business models. Amid challenges from operating systems, loan growth and neobank threats, one factor stands tall.

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

They are six of the greatest businesses ever and should form part of the global portfolios of all investors. The market sees risk in inflation and valuations but the companies are positioned for outstanding growth.

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

Latest Updates


Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require super funds - even SMSFs - to address retirement income and protect longevity risk.


How retirees might find a retirement solution in future

Superannuation funds need to establish a framework that offers retirees a retirement income solution that lasts a lifetime. It will challenge trustees to find a way to engage that their members understand and trust.

Investment strategies

Dividend investors, your turn is coming

Dividend payments from listed companies, depended on by many in retirement, have lagged the rebound in share prices over the past year. Better times are ahead but sources of dividends will differ from previous years.

Investment strategies

Four tips to catch the next 10-bagger in early-stage growth

Small cap investors face less mature companies with zero profit that need significant capital for growth. Without years of financial data to rely on, investors must employ creative ways to value companies.

Investment strategies

Investing in Japan: ready for an Olympic revival?

All eyes are on Japan and the opportunity to win for competing athletes. After disappointing investors for many years, Japan is also in focus for its value, diversification and the safe haven status of its currency.

Fixed interest

Five lessons for bond investors from the Virgin collapse

The collapse of Virgin Australia not only hit shareholders, but their bond investors received between 9 and 13 cents in the $1. A widely-diversified portfolio can tolerate losses better than a concentrated one.

Investment strategies

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

The traditional 60/40 portfolio might deliver only 1.5% above inflation in future without diversification benefits. Knowing an asset’s attributes rather than arbitrary definitions is better for investors.


Two factors that can transform retirement investing

Retirees want better returns but they have limited appetite to dial up their risk exposure in order to achieve it. Financial advice and protection strategies in portfolios can enhance investment outcomes.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.