Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 222

Meeting investor needs with human capital reporting

The disruptive effects of technological change occupy a lot of space in the business press, and for good reason. Investment markets have witnessed significant value destruction in sectors exposed to disruption over the past 15 years, and there is much more to come with rapid advances in automation, big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. Some commentators describe these forces as combining to create a Fourth Industrial Revolution, with profound implications for businesses.

Few companies or industries will escape investor scrutiny as technology-enabled business models proliferate to compete with incumbents. In this rapidly changing business landscape, the information available to understand risks and opportunities is increasingly inadequate for investors to develop informed views on a company’s future prospects. Can companies protect existing products from new online competitors? Can they adapt their business models to grow new markets? These are the types of questions investors continue to struggle with.

How are people managed in the face of disruption?

Rarely are we adequately told how people are managed and organised strategically to respond to risks and opportunities from disruption. Technology is only one response to disruption. Disclosure of human capital management falls well short of market needs, especially viewed from the perspective of investors seeking to gain insights into a company’s future prospects. Where human capital reporting is absent and strategic human capital risks are material, companies may not be meeting their disclosure requirements.

For the majority of companies, a significant portion of company value is deeply connected to its people, through intangible value. This under-recognised proportion of corporate value has grown with the decline of manufacturing in OECD economies and increasing representation of service-oriented businesses, technology and finance. Today, the majority of value is held in intellectual property, brands, and people. It follows that investors need information beyond that available in financial accounts to inform invest decisions.

Companies should explain more effectively how they are applying people to maximise long-term value. Companies with superior management and advanced communication of their people strategies should be rewarded in investment markets, or should be less severely punished where businesses are highly exposed to disruptive forces.

The biggest challenge to improving human capital disclosure is joining up relevant human capital information with corporate strategies and actions. It’s common practice to disclose metrics on employee engagement or employee turnover at highly aggregated levels, which may be meaningless. Such disclosures have limited value to investors seeking to understand, for example, how a company is positioned to respond to disruptive risks and opportunities in its markets.

Addressing reporting gaps

Fortunately, Australian listed companies have an existing structure to frame investor-focused human capital disclosure in annual reports through the Operating and Financial Review (OFR). OFR reporting requirements were introduced in Australia about five years ago. It’s not a big leap to see multiple linkages here to human capital, where delivery of strategy requires significant organisational restructuring, retention of key people, or acquisition of skill sets in high demand. Human capital linkages are also apparent in other OFR reporting areas including operational status, prospects and risks.

A leading example is Primary Health Care (ASX:PRY), whose business success relies fundamentally on attraction and retention of health care professionals (HCPs) to achieve targeted return on capital invested in its medical centre, pathology and imaging service assets. Primary discloses material information in the OFR on strategic changes to HCP contractual arrangements designed to improve attraction and retention of HCPs, HCP expenditure trends, and tailored metrics on HCP attraction and retention rates for exposed business segments. Such reporting remains the exception in the ASX however, hence there is significant scope to extend and improve human capital disclosure.

Restructuring in response to disruption

Rather than an additional reporting burden, human capital disclosure is an opportunity to give greater confidence to investors about future prospects. This is especially the case where business models are vulnerable to disruption, and human capital led responses are required to engender greater workplace agility and flexibility. For example, ANZ divulged that it would comprehensively restructure its work organisation by removing hierarchies and bureaucracy, adopting organisational structures akin to those in fast-moving tech companies as a direct response to disruption risks.

Disclosure approaches to communicate fundamental human capital reorganisation on this scale is only beginning to emerge. For example, how do workforce reorganisation strategies integrate with business strategies? How is ongoing operational delivery affected by the reorganisation of human capital for product groups? What are the key human capital-related risks to execution of workforce strategies? How is progress on execution of human capital strategies measured? What bearing is human capital management likely to have on future prospects?

If you were to survey experienced investors, most would say that financial data provides a limited picture of corporate health and investment attractiveness. Most analysts achieve a more complete picture by analysing industry structure, and gaining comfort with the quality of company management, for example. Enhanced disclosure of human capital management fills information gaps to round out assessment of outlook.

Advancing meaningful human capital disclosure is a less onerous task where corporates are some way down the track of integrating their strategic and human resource functions. The opportunity to link with investor relations to improve reporting outcomes should be apparent, and the task should be one of making a case for greater integration of human capital strategies and actions in reporting. This is clearly a bigger hill to climb where HR functions are siloed or disconnected from other functions. If the company is highly exposed to disruption and management actions to address risks are poorly communicated, the market will make the case.


Pauline Vamos is CEO of Regnan Governance Research & Engagement. She was CEO of the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) between 2007 and 2016.


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.