Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 398

Investment forecasts: foresight or folly?

Forecasting is an integral part of the human experience. Almost every key decision we make in life involves some element of guessing at the future; from the suburb in which we buy a property, the studies we undertake and those we might encourage our children to pursue, the career direction we take and, of course, to the investment decisions we make.

We want our financial futures to be as secure as possible, and so it is only to be expected that anyone claiming investment foresight (real or otherwise) will find a willing ear.

We therefore listen attentively to the forecasts of those only too happy to prognosticate on television, the radio or online. And there is, at present, no shortage of investment sages proffering views on everything from the re-emergence of US inflation to the future of fiat currencies.

But how do we, the investing public, determine if any of these predictions are in any way superior to simple guesses? Well, help is at hand.

The Professor of Prescience

Enter Philip E Tetlock. Tetlock is a Professor at the University of Pennsylvania, with appointments across the Wharton Business School, psychology and political science. In 1984 Professor Tetlock embarked on a multi-year research project to understand the nature of expert judgement, studying some 28,000 forecasts made by hundreds of experts across a variety of fields including politics, the economy and finance. His is among the longest, most detailed academic studies of whether humans can actually predict the future with any statistically significant degree of accuracy.

Tetlock pitted the expert forecasts against a range of algorithmically derived forecasts (so-called ‘Clinical’ versus ‘Actuarial’ forecasts). His conclusions at the end of almost 20 years of investigation? “Surveying these scores across regions, time periods, and outcome variables, we find support for one of the strongest debunking predictions: it is impossible to find any domain in which humans clearly outperformed crude extrapolation algorithms, less still sophisticated statistical ones.”

Forecasts made by the experts were statistically indistinguishable from random guesses. This finding subsequently morphed, somewhat unflatteringly, into a metaphor of the average finance guru being no more accurate than a ‘dart-throwing chimp’ in guessing future investment outcomes.

Are investment professionals better forecasters?

OK, so geo-political analysts can’t predict the location and timing of the next military coup. But surely seasoned investment professionals, with all that financial market data at their disposal, can outperform random guesses? One might be tempted to think so.

Unfortunately, the evidence is to the contrary. In a 2015 study of investment analyst forecasts, researchers Marcus Spiwoks, Zulia Gubaydullina and Oliver Hein found that none of the predictions for share markets, interest rates and exchange rates for four countries were able to beat simple forecasts based on a simple ‘random walk’ assumption (that the best guess as to the future state is the current state).

Delving specifically into the forecasting of interest rates, they studied 158,022 4- and 13-month rate predictions across 12 countries only to find that over 98% of the forecasts better reflected rates at the time of making the forecast than at the future date. Hence the name of their paper, Trapped in the Here and Now – New Insights into Financial Market Analyst Behavior. In short, there was no noticeable evidence of investment foresight present.

Separating forecasting skill from luck

So how does one determine if an expert’s forecast might suggest a degree of foresight rather than being just a product of luck? You certainly wouldn’t want to ask for examples of his or her forecasting track-record. Why? Because if someone makes enough forecasts, some of them are bound to be proved right. These correct ‘calls’ can then be used as proof of foresight, while the unsuccessful ones go unmentioned in the hope of a quick burial without the possibility of exhumation and further analysis.

Just as a broken clock can still be right twice a day, it can be difficult to know where forecasting skill ends, and luck begins. Without a way of separating the two we’ll never know if a forecaster is lucky but without skill or skilful but unlucky.

Thankfully one such way does exist, and it is remarkably low tech. It involves committing a forecast to paper in an investment diary. But, and this is key, the forecaster must provide both the forecast and an explanation as to why it will eventuate. In this way the forecaster commits to providing a prediction of both cause and effect.

As simple and effective as this technique is, it is roundly ignored by the investment industry. Few investment manager(s) or financial planners are prepared to back their forecasts in such a manner. Fewer clients are prepared to demand they do. That’s a pity as keeping an investment diary is one of the most powerful ways to determine if one is right for the wrong reasons (lucky rather than skilful) or wrong but for the right reasons (skilful but without luck).

If it all sounds a little pedestrian and something that an investment manager or adviser would deem to be beneath them, consider this. One of the world’s most astute investors, hedge fund billionaire George Soros, recalls a period when he recorded all his investment decisions and the reasons behind them in an investment diary. In his words: “I kept a diary in which I recorded the thoughts that went into my investment decisions on a real-time basis. …The experiment was a roaring success in financial terms – my fund never did better. It also produced a surprising result: I came out of the experiment with quite different expectations about the future.”

Learning to sit with irreducible uncertainty

Danish physicist and Nobel prize-winner Niels Bohr is reputed to have once said “Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.” What holds true in the sub-atomic world of matter holds doubly true in the world of investing, where the unpredictability of human behaviour, unlike the predictable laws of quantum mechanics, have an outsized effect on outcomes.

View the forecasts of investment gurus and talking heads for what they are, guesstimates. Undoubtedly intelligent and well informed, but guesstimates of an essentially unknown and unknowable future all the same. T’was ever thus.


Post-script: Those interested in delving further may wish to avail themselves of a copy of Philip Tetlock and Dan Gardner’s “Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction” Crown Publishers (New York), 2015.


Harry Chemay has more than two decades of experience across both wealth management and institutional asset consulting. An active participant within the wealth and superannuation space, Harry is a regular contributor in Australia and overseas, writing on topics across investing, retirement planning and the provision of financial advice.

Harry was a co-founder in one of Australia’s earliest digital advice services,, and has more recently been appointed an Australian Ambassador to the Transparency Task Force, a UK-led initiative to bring greater transparency and accountability to financial services.



Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

Why market forecasts matter to long-term investors

Who dares loses: Buffett on luck, taxes and a challenge


Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates


Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.


Hey boomer, first home buyers and all the fuss

What is APRA worried about? Most mortgagees can easily absorb increases in interest rates without posing a systemic threat to the banking system. Housing lending is a relatively risk-free activity for banks.


Residential Property Survey Q3 2021

Housing market sentiment has eased from record highs and confidence has ticked down as house price rises slow. Construction costs overtook lack of development sites as the biggest impediment for new housing.

Investment strategies

Personal finance is 80% personal and 20% finance

Understanding your own biases and behaviours is even more important than learning about markets. Overcome four major cognitive biases that may be sabotaging your investing and recognise them in others.

Where do stockmarket returns come from over time?

Cash flow statements differ from income statements and balance sheets, and every company must balance payments to investors versus investing into the business. Cash flows drive the value of the business.

Fixed interest

How to invest in the ‘reopening of Australia’ in bonds

As Sydney and Melbourne emerge from lockdown, there are some reopening trades in the Australian credit market which 'sophisticated' investors should consider as part of their fixed income portfolios.


10 trends reshaping the future of emerging markets

Demand for air travel, China’s growing middle-class population, Brazil’s digital payments take-up, Indian IPOs, and increased urbanisation are just some of the trends being seen in emerging economies.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.