Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 260

Opportunities across the capital structure

We highlighted in April 2018 in Cuffelinks how cheap the hybrids market looked, and the sector has since bounced back. Over the first 21 days of June, the Solactive ASX Hybrids Index, which is a market capitalisation-weighted benchmark of all listed subordinated bonds and hybrids, has risen 1.01% (or 101 basis points) compared to the RBA cash rate increase of 8 basis points.

Effects of new supply

A tsunami of $3.1 billion in new hybrid supply over February and March 2018, courtesy the Westpac and CBA issues (WBCPH and CBAPG), combined with Bill Shorten’s threats to remove cash rebates from franking credits, hammered the listed hybrid market down 1.49% over those months.

The market then bounced up 0.69% in April only to endure headwinds again in May after Macquarie launched an unexpectedly large $1 billion hybrid issue, which resulted in the sector suffering a 0.17% total return loss in that month.

By the end of May, major bank hybrids with five years left until final maturity (or call date) were paying franked spreads above the quarterly bank bill swap rate (BBSW) of 4.06%. This meant that total franked yields were as high as 6.6%, which compares favourably to the franked dividend yield on the ASX200 Index, which at the time was 5.44%. On an unfranked or cash basis, total yields at that time were a similarly chunky 4.9% on hybrids like CBAPD, which was above the 4.07% cash yield on the ASX200 Index despite the fact that hybrids have historically displayed one-quarter to one-third the volatility and downside risk of shares.

After the 1.01% total return over the first 21 days of June, where do valuations stand? The chart below shows the cash yields and franked yields on key ASX hybrids compared to the comparable yields on the ASX 200 index, and the major banks’ term deposits, senior bonds, subordinated bonds, and ordinary equities. This gives a sense of the returns available right across the capital structure with each sector obviously having different levels of risk.

Transfer of wealth from equity to bonds and hybrids

Since 2013, I’ve argued that the major banks needed to significantly deleverage their balance sheets, which they have done, reducing leverage from over 25 times six years ago to around 19 times today. This reduces their returns on equity, which have fallen from 17% to about 13% today. As the return on equity falls closer to their circa 11% cost of equity, the majors also have to trade much closer to book value, which is what has happened. Price to book value ratios have slumped from 3.0 times to around 1.5 times, in what should have been a direct transfer of wealth from the major banks’ equity holders to their bond and hybrid holders.

However, the surprising thing is, the much lower risks that the major banks carry today (as reflected by, amongst other things, vastly improved equity capital and liquidity coverage ratios), reinforced by the sale of risky non-core businesses, has yet to manifest in the form of tighter credit spreads, or a lower cost of debt capital.

At the end of 2006, CBA issued a 4-year senior bond at a 0.1% spread above BBSW that today would require spreads that are about eight times wider. In May 2007, CBA priced a lower-ranking subordinated bond with a 5-year call at just 0.24% above BBSW: similar bonds today trade six times wider.

CBA issued its PERLS IV hybrid in 2007 on a spread of 1.05% above BBSW, which is one-quarter of the spread CBA hybrids pay on the ASX today.

The investment thesis

In a world in which most assets, like equities and housing, remain very expensive by historical benchmarks (price/earnings multiples are above 2007 levels), these are pockets of opportunity.

Since the GFC was a financial credit crisis, the best value investments tend to be assets that were most adversely affected by this shock, such as the bonds and hybrids issued by banks and insurers, which are trading well wide of their 2007 levels in credit spread terms.


Christopher Joye is a Portfolio Manager with Coolabah Capital Investments, which invests in fixed income securities including those discussed by this article. This article does not address the individual circumstances of any investor.

Richard Murphy
June 28, 2018

Thanks Chris, informative as always. An aspect I've always found interesting is what is the relationship between equity volatility and hybrid volatility? Is it reasonably constant or does it vary significantly depending on circumstances?

If you measured this from 2004-2007 when total returns from both hybrids and senior corporate bonds looked very similar indeed, you might find hybrid volatility was even lower relative to equities than the 1/4 of equity vol you note. I.e., hybrids behaved more like bonds in circumstances where equities were really firing on all cylinders pre-GFC.

And no doubt the same might be true if you looked at historical performance since q2 2016 when equities were again firing. But when equities have very significant downturns like 2008, the hybrid-equity volatility relationship seems to change significantly and quickly, as the probability increases that some hybrid features could potentially come into play (call date deferral, div garnishing or deferral etc). The general correlation suddenly went from correlated with bonds 04-07 to correlated to equities in the worst days of 2008.

So is this relationship between equity and hybrids able to be explained by saying its 25-30% of equities, which no doubt it was over the historical period measured (we measured it between 2000 to 2015 and found it was closer to 50% curtesy of course of the GFC downturn). It is what it is historically, but what about as a guide to the future?

Or ultimately, is the answer re future expectations - it depends on what's going to happen with equities? If it's plain sailing for equities, then likely low vol. and correlation for hybrids. If a significant equity downturn awaits at some stage between 2018 to 2020, will hybrids still demonstrate 25-35% of equity vol., or will it be higher depending on how bad the equity downturn is? I.e., hybrids behave like bonds when all's well with equities, but more like equities if it all goes to custard. Feels like strong defenders when your strikers are scoring lots of goals, who fall over when you're under attack. Apologies for lame WC analogy.

June 28, 2018

The neither 'equity-fish nor debt-fowl' nature of hybrids, their perpetual nature solely at the issuer's option, instant convertibility by way of loss absorption into equity precisely it is worthless: these risks have been known from inception. However, the recent market turmoils, yields ticking up and closer to home, the consumer knee-capping by financial intermediation that makes the HQ relocate to Sicily have rightly spooked the investors.

June 28, 2018

Hybrids did quite nicely in the past couple of years (10% in 2016, 8% in 2017, including franking credits) – but that was mainly due to credit spreads declining since Feb 2016 (ie that saw prices rising from discount to premium).

Now spreads are rising, YTD total returns including franking credits (when you get them back next year and then re-investment them if you remember) is just 1.1% for the half year!


Leave a Comment:



Turbulence creates opportunities for bonds and hybrids

Why bank hybrids are far too expensive

Is it time to sell bank hybrids?


Most viewed in recent weeks

How to enjoy your retirement

Amid thousands of comments, tips include developing interests to keep occupied, planning in advance to have enough money, staying connected with friends and communities ... should you defer retirement or just do it?

Results from our retirement experiences survey

Retirement is a good experience if you plan for it and manage your time, but freedom from money worries is key. Many retirees enjoy managing their money but SMSFs are not for everyone. Each retirement is different.

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Fear is good if you are not part of the herd

If you feel fear when the market loses its head, you become part of the herd. Develop habits to embrace the fear. Identify the cause, decide if you need to take action and own the result without looking back. 

Latest Updates


The paradox of investment cycles

Now we're captivated by inflation and higher rates but only a year ago, investors were certain of the supremacy of US companies, the benign nature of inflation and the remoteness of tighter monetary policy.


Reporting Season will show cost control and pricing power

Companies have been slow to update guidance and we have yet to see the impact of inflation expectations in earnings and outlooks. Companies need to insulate costs from inflation while enjoying an uptick in revenue.


The early signals for August company earnings

Weaker share prices may have already discounted some bad news, but cost inflation is creating wide divergences inside and across sectors. Early results show some companies are strong enough to resist sector falls.


The compelling 20-year flight of SYD into private hands

In 2002, the share price of the company that became Sydney Airport (SYD) hit 80 cents from the $2 IPO price. After 20 years of astute investment driving revenue increases, it sold to private hands for $8.75 in 2022.

Investment strategies

Ethical investing responding to some short-term challenges

There are significant differences in the sector weightings of an ethical fund versus an index, and while this has caused some short-term headwinds recently, the tailwinds are expected to blow over the long term.

Investment strategies

If you are new to investing, avoid these 10 common mistakes

Many new investors make common mistakes while learning about markets. Losses are inevitable. Newbies should read more and develop a long-term focus while avoiding big mistakes and not aiming to be brilliant.

Investment strategies

RMBS today: rising rate-linked income with capital preservation

Lenders use Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities to finance mortgages and RMBS are available to retail investors through fund structures. They come with many layers of protection beyond movements in house prices. 



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.