Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 516

What investors should look for in a fund manager

As the Australian funds management industry continues to evolve, it is important to demand the highest standards from the firms that are entrusted with managing other people’s savings.

Australia’s compulsory superannuation regime has provided a fertile environment for funds management businesses. Barriers to entry are relatively low for what is a capital-light and highly scalable business model.

This backdrop has seen numerous business structures emerge, from more-traditional diversified financial institutions to ultra-focused single-strategy boutiques. The landscape is continuing to change, with mega mergers among both publicly listed firms and industry superannuation funds, and there appears no shortage of boutique startups readily backed by specialist ‘incubator’ firms.

Faced with such a broad and changing range of options, investors should consider which funds management model is going to provide the best structure for long-term alpha generation.

At Morningstar, we ponder this question in our assessment of the Parent Pillar, which is a key input into our overall ratings framework.

This article outlines the key attributes that we believe investors should look for in a fund manager.

What makes a good fund manager?

The key attributes we look for in a parent is strong stewardship and the ability to deliver positive net alpha to investors over the long term.

There are many factors that drive this, including:

  • An enduring business model that will be around for investors over the long term
  • A culture of putting investors first
  • Well-considered and executed capacity management
  • A focus on creating centres of investing excellence
  • The ability to attract and retain investment talent

Let’s explore each factor in more detail.

1. An enduring business model

To be successful, investors need to take a long-term view. It is therefore critical that any fund manager under consideration will be around for the long term.

With low barriers to entry, many individuals will try their hands at funds management, but to build an enduring and sustainable business, a certain level of scale and profitability must be reached.

Larger and more established firms have an advantage here, but to address the business risk of new ventures, many startups will seek the backing of a well-funded equity partner that can provide a guarantee of working capital over a period of time. Indeed, Australia has seen the rise of the ’boutique incubator’ model to solve this problem.

For more-established firms, investors should consider customer concentration risk. Large redemptions (such as from institutional investors) can jeopardize the financial sustainability of the firm.

It is important for investors to examine and understand the financial backing and risks associated with the fund manager itself, to ensure they will be around for the long term, and not close their doors prematurely because of a lack of profitability.

2. A culture of putting investors first

To be a good steward of investor capital, funds management firms must have a strong culture of putting investors first.

Unfortunately, conflicts of interest exist in any business, but investors should have a clear understanding of how these are managed.

One of the biggest conflicts is a firm’s desire for profit maximisation, which will come at the expense of investor returns. Fund managers derive their revenue from investment management fees, which are deducted from investment returns.

As mentioned above, firm profitability is important to ensure long-term sustainability, but above a certain level, fund managers should look to share the benefits of scale with investors through lower fees.

Funds management businesses may also seek to maximise profits through asset growth and new product development. This must be managed carefully to not distract or detract from existing offerings (see capacity management below).

While all super fund trustees and responsible entity board members have a fiduciary duty to act in unitholders’ best interests, public company boards also have a duty to maximise shareholder returns. This doesn’t make them any more conflicted than private companies, which have their own shareholders to consider, but profit drivers for listed companies are more visible because of reporting requirements.

Indeed, this public company transparency can be helpful, allowing investors to assess whether the right balance has been struck.

Industry funds are the best placed to maximise unitholder interests, as profits are reinvested for the benefit of members. Nevertheless, it remains important to ensure that costs are managed appropriately and strong governance practices are in place.

3. Well-considered capacity management

A key component of good stewardship is well considered and executed capacity management.

There is a limit to the level of assets under management a firm can effectively manage before market impact costs have a detrimental impact on investor returns.

If a fund manager is less conservative with regard to capacity, this may be a sign that it is seeking to gather assets to maximise profits, rather than protect the interests of existing investors. Given that successful firms tend to attract the highest levels of flows, it can be a difficult decision to soft-close or hard-close a strategy to new money in order to preserve capacity, but it is an important discipline to maintain.

The other major driver of asset growth in recent years has been consolidation, particularly in the industry superannuation fund segment.

The merger of Sunsuper and QSuper has seen the assets of Australian Retirement Trust exceed AUD 200 billion, joining AustralianSuper in what has been termed the ‘mega fund’ category. This is a double-edged sword as the potential cost savings from scale are countered by capacity management challenges, particularly when combined with the internalisation of the investment management function.

Unfortunately, there is no standard measure of a firm’s capacity, and it is often treated as more of an art than science. The least useful measure that is most often touted by fund managers is looking at strategy size as a percentage of total market capitalisation. This figure has little relevance for active managers that seek to concentrate their investments in specific areas of the market, rather than simply replicate the total market.

Much more useful are the two measures we focus on: days to trade and substantial shareholdings.

Days to trade is an objective measure of the time it would take to liquidate an individual position or total portfolio based on the average trading volume of that security. As a rule of thumb, we believe a fund can trade 25% of average daily volume without having an undue impact on the price. The less time it takes to liquidate a position, the better, as it enables the fund to be nimble in the face of market shifts. Fewer than 10 days to trade represents a highly liquid portfolio, but beyond 30, 60, and 90 days begins to raise questions around capacity management.

For equities, we also monitor the number and weight of substantial shareholdings (greater than 5% of issued capital). A large number of substantial shareholdings or individual holdings in securities that account for greater than 10% of issued capital are signs that capacity management should be closely scrutinised.

4. A focus on centres of investing excellence

When it comes to managing money, it is better to be good at one thing than average at many. This is one of the main benefits of the boutique asset-management model—a singular focus on an area of excellence rather than suffering from the distractions of a diversified product offering.

Larger diversified firms can overcome this issue by developing individual centres of excellence under a single firm umbrella, but it is not easy. The rise of the boutique asset-manager model has seen increased competition for talent. Larger diversified firms must continue to evolve to create an environment that nurtures and retains investing excellence.

Industry funds have increasingly moved toward the internalisation of investment teams. This is a significant shift in approach and brings a substantial challenge of maintaining a strong investment culture across each individual asset class.

5. The ability to attract and retain talent

Funds management is an industry reliant on human capital and individual talent.

The boutique model’s emergence was due to star fund managers wanting to own their own businesses and be masters of their own destinies. The list of portfolio managers who have left large, diversified asset managers to start their own shops is a long one.

While boutiques have had an edge, diversified financial-services firms and industry funds are evolving their business models to address the issue of talent retention. Revenue share models and shadow equity arrangements have become more common as large firms seek to replicate the economic benefits of the boutique structure. There are other benefits that a larger diversified firm can bring, such as greater distribution, compliance, and administrative support. But this is where the boutique incubator models have stepped in to simplify the business ownership experience and allow fund managers to focus on alpha generation.

The main drawback of the industry’s reliance on individual talent is key-person risk.

Recent history shows that despite all the incentives of equity ownership and profit-sharing, portfolio managers may choose to leave for unexpected and personal reasons.

All fund managers should have a clear succession plan in place. The onus is on the board and management to ensure that contingencies are well-thought-out and implemented.


Michael Malseed is a Director of Manager Research at Morningstar, owner of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

A Morningstar Premium free trial is available on the link below, including access to the portfolio management service, Sharesight.

Try Morningstar Premium for free



Leave a Comment:



Using past performance is a risky way to invest

The state of play in the funds management industry


Most viewed in recent weeks

2024/25 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ATO has released all the superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2024. Here's what’s changing and what’s not, and some key considerations and opportunities in the lead up to 30 June and beyond.

The greatest investor you’ve never heard of

Jim Simons has achieved breathtaking returns of 62% p.a. over 33 years, a track record like no other, yet he remains little known to the public. Here’s how he’s done it, and the lessons that can be applied to our own investing.

Five months on from cancer diagnosis

Life has radically shifted with my brain cancer, and I don’t know if it will ever be the same again. After decades of writing and a dozen years with Firstlinks, I still want to contribute, but exactly how and when I do that is unclear.

Is Australia ready for its population growth over the next decade?

Australia will have 3.7 million more people in a decade's time, though the growth won't be evenly distributed. Over 85s will see the fastest growth, while the number of younger people will barely rise. 

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 552 with weekend update

Being rich is having a high-paying job and accumulating fancy houses and cars, while being wealthy is owning assets that provide passive income, as well as freedom and flexibility. Knowing the difference can reframe your life.

  • 21 March 2024

Why LICs may be close to bottoming

Investor disgust, consolidation, de-listings, price discounts, activist investors entering - it’s what typically happens at business cycle troughs, and it’s happening to LICs now. That may present a potential opportunity.

Latest Updates


20 US stocks to buy and hold forever

Recently, I compiled a list of ASX stocks that you could buy and hold forever. Here’s a follow-up list of US stocks that you could own indefinitely, including well-known names like Microsoft, as well as lesser-known gems.

The public servants demanding $3m super tax exemption

The $3 million super tax will capture retired, and soon to retire, public servants and politicians who are members of defined benefit superannuation schemes. Lobbying efforts for exemptions to the tax are intensifying.


Baby Boomer housing needs

Baby boomers will account for a third of population growth between 2024 and 2029, making this generation the biggest age-related growth sector over this period. They will shape the housing market with their unique preferences.

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: When the first member of a couple dies

The surviving spouse has a lot to think about when a member of an SMSF dies. While it pays to understand the options quickly, often they’re best served by moving a little more slowly before making final decisions.


Small caps are compelling but not for the reasons you might think...

Your author prematurely advocated investing in small caps almost 12 months ago. Since then, the investment landscape has changed, and there are even more reasons to believe small caps are likely to outperform going forward.


The mixed fortunes of tax reform in Australia, part 2

Since Federation, reforms to our tax system have proven difficult. Yet they're too important to leave in the too-hard basket, and here's a look at the key ingredients that make a tax reform exercise work, or not.

Investment strategies

8 ways that AI will impact how we invest

AI is affecting ever expanding fields of human activity, and the way we invest is no exception. Here's how investors, advisors and investment managers can better prepare to manage the opportunities and risks that come with AI.



© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.