Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 8

Jumping frogs and rhyming markets

Who is the greatest market analyst of all time? Some will nominate Benjamin Graham. Some may opt for his student Warren Buffett. I liked Ron Brierley in his day, although his lustre has faded.

But towering above them all is Mark Twain. Mark Twain, you may ask?  Wasn’t he a writer and a Mississippi riverboat poker-shark? What does he know about markets? Well, everything apparently.

"The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County" is an 1865 short story by Twain, his first success as a writer, bringing him to national attention. In it the narrator tells a story about a gambler betting on a jumping frog.

In this story, Twain pens an immortal line for stockmarket scholars about his favorite theory: “no occurrence is sole and solitary, but is merely a repetition of a thing which has happened before, and perhaps often ...”

Like Twain, we have asked ourselves, “Haven’t I seen this all before?” At an individual level this is usually called déjà vu and can strike with incidents in life, memories triggered by visits to different places, smells or sounds.

On a bigger canvas, this is called historic recurrence and is the repetition of similar events in history often separated by long periods of time. The concept of historic recurrence has been applied particularly to the rise and fall of empires and the continual and relentless wars that erupt between tribes and nation states. Nowhere is this better observed than in the history of Afghanistan. Since the time of Alexander the Great, this beautiful but blighted region has been subjected to continual periodic invasions where the invader always and inevitably loses and goes home with its tail between its legs. If G.W. Bush had been a student of historic recurrence, much American blood and treasure (and a not inconsiderable amount of Australian) could have been saved. Alas, he doesn’t appear to have been much of a student of anything!

While people often say, “History repeats itself" in cycles, this is never exactly true. This was also appreciated by Twain, obviously a student of the long cycle, when he wrote, "History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme."

Recurrences take place due to sometimes subtle and not readily identifiable circumstances. Some of these factors may not be understood at the time the event is occurring and may only become apparent years later. The reason for the recurrence will often be hotly debated. Nowhere is this better evidenced than in the stockmarket.

As the chart below shows the stockmarket may not be repeating history but it’s rhyming, with all the exuberance of a Wordsworth poem.

The Australian equity market is presently repeating a performance pattern similar to the mid 1970’s recovery. It’s not performing exactly the same way, but it’s close. It is now 65 months with a 25% decline since the Australian equity market peaked in late 2007. Over the same time frame (65 months) from the pre-decline peak in January 1973 to March 1978, the All Ordinaries Index had fallen by approximately the same amount as shown in the chart. Both periods experienced peak to trough reversals of more than 50%.

The chart shows the returns from the All Ordinaries Index post the 1973 and 2007 peaks. As is readily observable, the moves in the two periods tend to mirror each other. Let’s say it is not repeating itself but it sure is rhyming.

“So what?”, you may ask. The model, if it is a true example of historical recurrence, may predict the course of the sharemarket over the next couple of years. Or it may not.

Why would this rhyming model work? Simple. The stockmarket is a barometer of human emotion and particularly human frailty. It registers them all … fear, greed, lust, paranoia, confusion, panic, herd-mentality, envy and disappointment. It’s a big human stew but the ingredients never change so the taste is the same, although it comes to the boil at different times. “Gee haven’t I tasted this somewhere before?” The ingredients never change because people never change. Not really. Not even over long periods of time.

The herd always charges off together in one direction then just wait, what’s that sound you hear? It’s the herd charging back again in the opposite direction. They head off over the hill. What is the only thing you know for sure? That given time you will see them all come thundering over that same hill heading in the direction they first came from. Humans, like jumping frogs and migrating wildebeest, never change. The graphs from 1973 and 2007 demonstrate this.

Writing novels and playing poker on riverboats, while consuming large quantities of whisky, does not a great market analyst make! Or does it? I think I’ll try it.

 

Kieran Kelly is Managing Director of Sirius Fund Management and has over 30 years’ experience in fund management and sharebroking.

 

  •   28 March 2013
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

ASX reporting season: Room for optimism

An odd and wild ASX reporting season

Why long term investing is not easy

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.