Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 70

Just what is a re-contribution strategy?

You may have heard about a ‘re-contribution strategy’, but do you really know what it is and how it works? Often when an adviser or accountant provides an idea that will reduce a tax liability, you accept it without really knowing how it is achieved. That’s what you pay them for – right!

Let me explain what a re-contribution strategy is.

Who is eligible?

A re-contribution strategy is where you withdraw money from your SMSF and re-contribute the money back into your SMSF. Before you can do this, you need to be able to access your money by satisfying one of the following conditions of release:

  • reached your preservation age (55 to 60 years) and retired from your employment
  • reached age 65 (working or not)
  • ceased work temporarily as a result of physical and/or mental illness
  • ceased work as a result of permanent incapacity
  • experienced a terminal medical condition
  • accessed money under severe financial hardship grounds
  • accessed money under compassionate grounds via the Department of Human Services
  • accessed money under the transition to retirement arrangements.

Of course it is unlikely that a person accessing their money under financial hardship or compassionate grounds would be considering a re-contribution strategy.

If you access money in your SMSF without satisfying at least one of the conditions of release, then you will be in trouble with the Australian Taxation Office which regulates SMSFs.

Why bother?

The two main reasons why advisers may suggest a re-contribution strategy is to:

  • Reduce the tax payable on your superannuation pension, especially if you are under the age of 60
  • Lower the tax payable on benefits paid to your beneficiaries in the event of your death.

Money in your SMSF is comprised of two components. One component is the tax-free component which is made up of non-concessional contributions received by your SMSF. The other component is the taxable component which is made up of concessional contributions received by your SMSF and earnings from SMSF investments. Under the superannuation and income tax laws, superannuation benefits (pension and lump sum) paid to you are subject to a proportion rule which requires your benefit to be paid in the same proportion as the tax-free and taxable components of your superannuation interest in your SMSF.

For example, if your SMSF is comprised of a 60% taxable component and a 40% tax-free component, then your superannuation benefit, when paid out, must retain the 60% taxable component and the 40% tax-free component.

A withdrawal and re-contribution strategy involves withdrawing or accessing your superannuation entitlements that consist of the taxable and tax-fee components and re-contributing some or all of the money back into your SMSF as a non-concessional contribution (i.e. all tax-free). This increases the amount of tax-free money in your superannuation account which provides tax savings if you are accessing a pension while under the age of 60. It may also mean large tax savings when you pass on your superannuation savings to your non-dependant beneficiaries after your death.

This is because the taxable component of a pension benefit received by a person under the age of 60 is taxed at the person’s marginal tax rate less a 15% tax offset. Converting the taxable component to a tax-free component increases your tax-free pension income.

When you pass away, your beneficiaries who are over the age of 18 or are non-dependant will also receive a greater portion of your death benefit without having to pay tax.

Watch that you don’t exceed your non-concessional contributions cap. In addition, if you are aged 65 to 74 you will need to be at least working 40 hours in a period of 30 consecutive days to be able to make non-concessional contributions into your superannuation fund.

It pays to understand how things work so you can better discuss with your adviser.

 

Monica Rule worked for the Australian Taxation Office for 28 years and is the author of ‘The Self Managed Super Handbook – Superannuation Law for Self Managed Superannuation Funds in plain English’. Monica is presenting a series of SMSF seminars and for details see www.monicarule.com.au.

 

  •   11 July 2014
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
Peter Grace
July 11, 2014

The theory is wonderful but what about the need to liquidate assets to make the withdrawal and the potential tax payable as well as being out of the market whilst all this is going on. SMSF trustees holding a large percent of the fund in illiquid assets like property can't do this. And then there is the fee charged by the adviser to manage the process. And all you may end up achieving is saving the tax payable by your beneficiaries and paying it yourself. It might be easier to cash out of super once you have no remaining tax dependents - the payment is tax free after age 60 and most retirees will be able to arrange their affairs so they don't pay much tax anyway.

Ramani
July 11, 2014

While the problems posed by Peter Grace may be navigated subject to deed provisions re: lump sum benefit payments and in specie contributions, the phase of the fund (accumulation or hybrid?) and age profile of members (all above 60?), the truism that nothing about tax is simple still applies.
Apart from the Cleopatran ability of ATO to change its mind any time (coincidentally when the previous position is revenue-negative, what a surprise!), recontribution hides a potential posthumous sting. The ability to claw back the contribution taxes paid, along with their compounding effect (since the later of 1 July 1988 or subsequent entry) could mean significant top-up to the lump sum death benefit, and increasing the tax-free component will reduce this figure.
As this is a rare instance of the taxman returning collected taxes for many years, it is not to be ignored.

Davo
March 30, 2015

No wonder the average man in the street cant be bothered with this stuff.

Andrew Peters
July 12, 2014

All good points raised.

I think one of the main reasons to explore a recontribution is simply a level of protection against future legislative risk.

Over the next 20 years I'm not so sure we will see the tax concessions on pensions retained as they are today - in our Advice Business we counsel all SMSF investors about the pros and cons of recontributions, including Ramani's point about änti detriment"payments.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Ray Dalio on 2025’s real story, Trump, and what’s next

The renowned investor says 2025’s real story wasn’t AI or US stocks but the shift away from American assets and a collapse in the value of money. And he outlines how to best position portfolios for what’s ahead.

Making sense of record high markets as the world catches fire

The post-World War Two economic system is unravelling, leading to huge shifts in currency, bond and commodity markets, yet stocks seem oblivious to the chaos. This looks to history as a guide for what’s next.

3 ways to fix Australia’s affordability crisis

Our cost-of-living pressures go beyond the RBA: surging house prices, excessive migration, and expanding government programs, including the NDIS, are fuelling inflation, demanding bold, structural solutions.

Is there a better way to reform the CGT discount?

The capital gains tax discount is under review, but debate should go beyond its size. Its original purpose, design flaws and distortions suggest Australia could adopt a better, more targeted approach.

How cutting the CGT discount could help rebalance housing market

A more rational taxation system that supports home ownership but discourages asset speculation could provide greater financial support to first home buyers.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 648 with weekend update

This is my last edition as Editor of Firstlinks. I’m moving onto a new role though the newsletter will remain in good hands until my permanent replacement is found.

  • 5 February 2026

Latest Updates

Property

The 5% deposit scheme is bad for homeowners and Australia

An ‘affordability’ scheme making the county more vulnerable to economic shocks and contributing to the deteriorating financial situation of everyday Australians.

Investment strategies

Is defensive the new offensive?

Relatively boring, unglamorous, defensive stocks like Kroger and Allstate have quietly outperformed gilded tech giants, offering steady growth, visibility, and resilient returns in a market captivated by AI and flashier industries.

Shares

How the RBA scores on its inflation goal

The Reserve Bank continues to face criticism from all sides. A reminder of the RBA's mandate and a review of their track record in maintaining price stability since the early 1990s.

Investment strategies

Levered credit: A late cycle ingredient for drawdown pain

As credit spreads normalised through 2025, yield‑hungry investors have turned to leverage for high returns, uncomfortably echoing pre‑GFC behaviours. Investors need to be careful to understand the true risk‑return trade‑off.

Planning

The more things change… longevity just goes on increasing

Australia needs a major shift in longevity awareness, attitudes and behaviour if, as a community, we are to reap the benefits of increasing longevity. Adopting a national strategy is well overdue.

Property

The improving outlook of Australian commercial real estate

The sector is positioned to benefit from defensive and resilient income streams supported by embedded rental increase opportunities. 

Property

Seize hidden opportunities among 50+ home buyer schemes in Australia

There is a laundry list of government schemes to help Australian's struggling with housing affordability. Savvy buyers should take advantage to break into the property market.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.