Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 92

A lesson in bargaining, Medibank-style

Have you ever bargained? Has that special thrill of securing the once-in-a-lifetime bargain ever travelled up your spine? Have you, as the seller, laughed behind the aforesaid bargain hunter, savouring the thrill of their hallucination?

On the other hand, have you felt the pangs of pain piercing through your veins when you realised that the wonderful bargain you bought was available at half the cost at the fixed price store, and with full warranty to boot? Or as the seller you gave away a costlier piece?

Minister Mathias Cormann, who flogged Medibank Private’s Interesting Public Orgy (known as the IPO), used the bargaining method to great effect, but unlike the normal parties owning or acquiring the goods, he was neither. He acted as the agent for the taxpayers of Australia.

Even this is disputed by policyholders of Medibank. They claim that the Government never paid for its stake, and has sold their property for a cool 5 billion. Nice one, if you can get it.

Bizarre in the bazaar

So the good Senator rushes into the bazaar, where the wise, angelic or otherwise, tread warily. As those who have shopped in any Asian, South American or East European bargain basements would know, these are populated largely by touts, hangers-on, window-shoppers and price surveyors with a 1% incidence of shopper-crowd ratio.

He is promptly surrounded by merchant bankers, lead managers, brokers, accountants and advisers: ‘rent-seekers’ in trade parlance, who make their money regardless of whether the market stays up, down, sideways or comatose. In fact, whether the market remains at all. The true mark of a professional being making money, regardless.

With their professional help, how much stock to unload, what preferences and discounts to offer, in what time frames and when to hang up the shingles are all decided. Brokers are caught up in this endogenic frenzy, as they bid up their clients’ needs to secure firm allocations.

On the hallowed principle that ‘your money is safer with me than you’ (equivalent legal lingo: ‘possession is nine-tenths of the law’, the other 40% being consumed by counsel fees. Never count on them to count), the purchasers are asked to deposit more than they would eventually be liable for. The interest earnings would fund the Christmas party nicely, thank you.

The frenzy gets to the stage where the agent selling for the owner in the bargain basement plays, like a seasoned veteran, on the psychology of the bidders: will they sense losing out and bid for more? This is the moment you see in the souk when the shopkeeper thrashes his hands about in confected disgust, speaking in an unknown tongue. No translation needed: ‘raise your bid, or lose out’. In IPOs, the strange tongue takes the form of a product disclosure statement. Like Mark Twain’s classic, it is praised but never read.

During the actual sales period, the veiled threats continue. Did you hear that the issue is being several times oversubscribed? Is it likely that the issue will close earlier than the closing date? Did you know even firm allocations will have a haircut?

Like the clever shopkeeper in the souk, interested purchasers are streamed into multiple queues: pre-registered and general, stratified into policyholders, employees and the public. They may not know what either they or anyone else is doing in the queue, but it helps to behave as they did.

Subtle suggestions (or brazen shouts) about early bidders getting favoured treatment works like a treat. Everyone wants to be a favourite and rushes in, so no one is.

Come announcement time, our bargaining agent enlists, for a fee, those with the sharp pencil and the mind of an abacus to determine the basis of allocation. Like a treasurer with an unquenchable thirst for tax, he makes up a sliding scale, consisting of several tiers showing the allocation at each range: x shares up to A applied for, plus y% of any excess above A. Symptomatic of the crudity of the entire spectacle, y is usually a vulgar fraction. Are mathematicians into psychology?

People call up the brokers, the hotline and each other to understand what they got. Schadenfreude reigns: that the other mob fared worse than us is sweet music to the auditory receptacles.

On the appointed day for deferred settlement, our agent and the guy who will be left with the bathwater (a pity, really, about the baby) wear the smile of the cat that got the cream and shake up the polished bell vigorously. Something about the orgy must have polish to it, after all.

Not much left on the table

Would the heavens open up and financial nirvana be nigh? Zillions of eyes peer into the trading screen.

No record-breaking debut, this. A measly paper profit for the punter and even less for the ‘savvy’ institutions. As ennui sets in, the price dives below the insto-price, and with it goes the dream of powering up the portfolio performance. As the market settles back into its usual stupor, the hangers-on ready themselves for their next orgy.

As for the market price itself, it’s not quite settled. Will the disaffected policyholders sue for compensation? Will they vote with their wallets and walk, destroying value?

Who knows? As the philosopher Hume taught us in epistemology, inductive inferences are worth nothing, being circular. To prove them you must believe in them.

What about Mathias, our bargain agent? He finds that bargaining, like itching, can give a pleasant sensation but only as long as the scratching continues. He should look for more. Is this the first recorded case of agency risk infecting the agent, rather than the consumer as hitherto?

Bargain bazaars always imprint their lessons:

  1. Investing for the long term and reacting to the first few days’ price is like planting tomatoes and uprooting them each day to see if all is well. Messy, and fruitless.
  2. As in any IPO bargain, some (sellers) win; some (brokers) wine; the rest (index investors) whine. Win-win, it sure ain’t.


Ramani Venkatramani is an actuary and Principal of Ramani Consulting Pty Ltd. Between 1996 and 2011, he was a senior executive at ISC /APRA, supervising pension funds.

December 19, 2014

OMG Tim, has that wily Mathias taken my hint and sold Medicare as well? I missed that...

December 16, 2014

Michael, Medicare was built with taxpayer funds by a government agency, therefore when it is sold the sale proceeds go back into the pool of money that is known as 'taxpayer funds' or consolidated revenue.

Call it what you will, but the sale proceeds will be used for govt expenditure on critical infrastructure Australia needs.

You don't own Medibank any more than you own the Harbour Bridge or Opera House.

December 14, 2014


Very cute logic. Next time you are in Canberra, we may find you sound asleep at the Lodge, as you (presumably) own it already. I am sure Tony will accommodate you....

December 14, 2014

As a taxpayer, didn't we pay for Medibank already? I participated in the Telstra sale and my thoughts in the end were why am I paying for something I already own?

Capital Markets Guy
December 13, 2014

What I don't understand with the Medibank sale is why it makes sense to taxpayers: at a sale price of $5.5 billion, paying off debt would save about $165 million a year in interest payments, but the Government foregoes about $400 million a year in dividends, plus share price appreciation.

Richard Lambert
December 12, 2014

For a private purchaser how would ACCC view an offer to sell by a corporation

1 We will tell you the price in due course
2 you must pay a deposit which will be more than what you will end up paying
3 Because we will not tell you how many you will get but your payment will be held by us
4 We will tell you how many you bought and at what price
2 We will refund you any surplus above your deposit but without interest


Leave a Comment:



Bounce back delivers super second-half for IPOs

The future has arrived in Australia

Beware of investment bankers bearing gifts


Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Among key trends in Australian banks, one factor stands out

The Big Four banks look similar but they are at fundamentally different stages as they move to simpler business models. Amid challenges from operating systems, loan growth and neobank threats, one factor stands tall.

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

They are six of the greatest businesses ever and should form part of the global portfolios of all investors. The market sees risk in inflation and valuations but the companies are positioned for outstanding growth.

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

How to manage the run down in your income in retirement

The first of five articles on modern retirement income products that aim for an increasing pension that lasts for life and on average should not decline in real terms. They are not silver bullets but worth a look.

Latest Updates


Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require super funds - even SMSFs - to address retirement income and protect longevity risk.


How retirees might find a retirement solution in future

Superannuation funds need to establish a framework that offers retirees a retirement income solution that lasts a lifetime. It will challenge trustees to find a way to engage that their members understand and trust.

Investment strategies

Dividend investors, your turn is coming

Dividend payments from listed companies, depended on by many in retirement, have lagged the rebound in share prices over the past year. Better times are ahead but sources of dividends will differ from previous years.

Investment strategies

Four tips to catch the next 10-bagger in early-stage growth

Small cap investors face less mature companies with zero profit that need significant capital for growth. Without years of financial data to rely on, investors must employ creative ways to value companies.

Investment strategies

Investing in Japan: ready for an Olympic revival?

All eyes are on Japan and the opportunity to win for competing athletes. After disappointing investors for many years, Japan is also in focus for its value, diversification and the safe haven status of its currency.

Fixed interest

Five lessons for bond investors from the Virgin collapse

The collapse of Virgin Australia not only hit shareholders, but their bond investors received between 9 and 13 cents in the $1. A widely-diversified portfolio can tolerate losses better than a concentrated one.

Investment strategies

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

The traditional 60/40 portfolio might deliver only 1.5% above inflation in future without diversification benefits. Knowing an asset’s attributes rather than arbitrary definitions is better for investors.


Two factors that can transform retirement investing

Retirees want better returns but they have limited appetite to dial up their risk exposure in order to achieve it. Financial advice and protection strategies in portfolios can enhance investment outcomes.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.