Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 8

Lessons from 32 years of investment returns

‘Past performance is no guarantee of future performance.’ How many times have we heard that? The Australian Securities & Commission (ASIC) insists that fund managers and financial planners include it in practically every piece of communication they produce.

The Australian sharemarket is more than 20% up in this financial year, and there is much discussion between pundits on everything between an imminent crash, a ‘plateau’ and a brief correction before an onward march.

So it was with interest that I looked at a table sent to me by a fellow financial planner, Dejan Pekic of Newealth. It shows returns from different investment types (asset classes) for each calendar year since 1981. The data is considered robust over this period because before 1979 there were various proxies for the ‘Australian’ sharemarket index, which often excluded major companies. In the table below:

  • the best performing asset class in a particular year is highlighted in green, and recessions are in orange
  • ‘Property’ refers to Australian listed property trusts not residential property
  • Fixed Interest refers to government and corporate bonds, not term deposits
  • returns from International Shares are in Australian dollars, not hedged.

Asset Class Calendar Year Returns, 1981- 2012

Sourced from Newealth Financial Services.

Here are a few observations:

  • In 11 out of the 32 years, the sharemarket has risen by more than 20% in a calendar year. In fact, in more than half of these occasions the rise has been 34% or greater. So rises of 20%+ in a year are not unusual.
  • Nine times out of ten, a negative year in the Australian share market has been followed by a positive year, and that positive year was more than 17%. This supports the notion of sticking to your guns after a bad year.
  • Returns from international shares have been relatively poor compared with Australian shares for many years. International shares have not been the best performing asset class since 1999. But over the last 32 years as a whole, Australian shares have only delivered annual returns of 1.1% more than international shares. Exchange rates are a major factor.
  • In almost 80% of the years, the difference in performance between Australian and international shares was greater than 10%. 25% of the time one was negative and the other was positive. This challenges the popular belief that returns from Australian shares and international shares are highly correlated.
  • Cash has only been the best performer once, in 1994. If you had all your money in cash in that year you would have felt pretty good, because everything else went down. But if you had stayed in cash for the following years you would have missed the 20.2%, 14.6%, 12.2%, 11.6% and 16.1% returns delivered by Australian shares.
  • However, in ‘real’ terms, cash returns have been pretty good over the past 32 years. The average annual return is 8.9% which is 5.3% more than inflation (CPI). This implies that cash is a good investment when inflation is high, which is contrary to what we are often told. Currently, we have a different situation, as interest rates are barely covering inflation.
  • CPI has been below 3.6% for 20 out of the last 22 years. Many market commentators say that low inflation means low share market returns. However, in 15 of those years the Australian sharemarket delivered returns that were more than 10%, with the average return being 12%.
  • Fixed interest has only delivered a loss once in 32 years, with average returns comfortably above inflation. However, interest rates have been declining for practically the whole time. This has been good for fixed interest returns because falling interest rates mean capital gains. The only time fixed interest delivered negative returns was in 1994 when interest rates went up.
  • Listed property has been the best performing asset class in six of the last thirteen years. However, much like Pluto is no longer considered a planet because of its small size, I believe listed property should be considered a sector of the sharemarket. I am waiting for somebody to replace listed property with residential property in a chart like this. Then we can really have a discussion about performance and diversification.

Some will argue that the 1980s is no longer relevant because inflation and high interest rates have been well and truly beaten. But how far back should we go? According to AMP, which has analysed statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Real Estate Institute of Australia, the average annual returns from cash, Australian bonds and Australian shares since 1926 are 5.7%, 7% and 11.4% respectively. Australian residential property has delivered 11.1%.

Each of you will have your own opinion, but the figures are what they are. So, whilst past performance is indeed no guarantee of future performance, it’s all we’ve got.

 

  •   27 March 2013
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Why buying speculative stocks often proves irresistible

Defence beats offence in investing

Australian large caps outperform small caps over long term

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

2 billion reasons to fix retirement income

A proposal to address Australia's 'stranded balances' in retirement by requiring super funds to transition members to pension phase at 65, boosting retirement income and reframing super as a source of income.

The ultimate superannuation EOFY checklist 2026

Here is a checklist of 28 important issues you should address before June 30 to ensure your SMSF or other super fund is in order and that you are making the most of the strategies available.

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 662 with weekend update

The debate over the budget is increasingly shaped by frustration and perceptions of unfairness, rather than clear-eyed assessment of policy outcomes.

Two months into retirement

A retirement researcher's take on retirement and her focus on each of her six resource buckets to stay engaged during the transition and beyond.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

Latest Updates

Investing

Markets without a margin for error

From US fiscal pressure to China’s shifting growth model and Australia’s structural constraints, markets are yet to reflect a less forgiving global investment landscape.

Investment strategies

The investment mistake killing your returns

Retail investors face an increasingly complex product environment, but simplicity may be the most overlooked advantage in building a portfolio you can actually live with.

The ticking clock on oil reserves

A sustained disruption through the Strait of Hormuz is forcing a rapid drawdown of global inventories. Without a resolution, the arithmetic points to a supply shock by early August and a sharp surge in the oil price.

Infrastructure

Managing the impact of the Middle East conflict on listed infrastructure

The outbreak of conflict in the Middle East in February 2026 marks an historic shock for oil and gas markets, with major implications for inflation, interest rates and ultimately for listed infrastructure companies.

Economy

Rent inflation and the missing policy

The government plans to remove negative gearing to help renters buy homes. For those who remain renters, the wrong levers are being pulled to try and increase rental unit supply.

Investment strategies

The Risk-Wealth Paradox: Why more money means you should take less risk

As wealth grows, so does the assumption that risk should too. But in reality, the opposite may be true: once you understand how the value of money changes over time, the case for taking less risk becomes far more compelling.

SMSF strategies

SMSF estate planning: Eight things to consider

As super balances grow, SMSFs are becoming central to retirement outcomes. Without proper planning for “Armageddon” scenarios, even well-structured funds can unravel when it matters most.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.