Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 12

Let’s talk more about compounding and the Rule of 72

Albert Einstein is often quoted as having described compound interest as ‘the greatest mathematical discovery of all time,’ although this is probably apocryphal. One of the richest bankers in history, Baron Rothschild, described it as the Eighth Wonder of the World. The founder of Vanguard, Jack Bogle, said, ‘compound interest is a miracle.’

What’s all the fuss about? How many financial advisers discuss this incredible concept with their clients? In fact, an appreciation of compounding should be on every investment agenda.

A good example of the problem of ignoring compounding comes from the most often quoted number in the Australian financial markets, the All Ordinaries Index. It’s mentioned in every news bulletin, and most of us know it’s currently about 5,000. Since it peaked at about 6,850 in November 2007, the market is down about 28%. Right?

Investing in equities looks really bad compared with pre-GFC levels, but it’s ignoring the power of compounding. The All Ords is most often quoted as a price index, based on the prices of companies listed on the ASX. But it excludes the dividends they have paid, and so makes the performance of equities seem worse. The accumulation (or total return) index includes the receipt of and reinvestment of dividends. It is a better indication of the way the market has performed. The All Ords Accumulation Index is currently about 39,000, and it peaked around 43,000, so it’s down about 8%. Not wonderful but not 28% and not too terrible given the GFC was a one in 50 year event (hopefully).

If the Commonwealth Bank pays a fully franked $1.60 dividend and the day it trades ex-dividend, its share price falls $1.60, the All Ords will fall (if other stocks are unchanged). Does that mean an investor has lost money? Of course not. In fact, the dividend was fully franked and the investor is well ahead, it’s just that $1.60 is in their pocket, not the CBA share price. The accumulation index allows for this, as shown below.

(It could be argued that we should consider both the real price and the real accumulation index, that is, adjusted for inflation. In this case, the price index is currently down a very sad 37% from its peak, and even the accumulation index is down 20%, because inflation has risen 14.6% since December 2007).

Compounding should be part of everyone’s basic financial literacy, and a simple message without going into the mathematics is the Rule of 72. This formula provides an approximation of how long it takes to double an investment at a given interest rate. Dividing 72 by the rate of interest earned gives the number years it takes to double your money - the ‘doubling time.’

When the ASX300 Accumulation Index delivered returns greater than 20% in each of the pre-GFC years of 2004, 2005 and 2006, it created a climate of elevated investor expectations. Money flowed into equity funds, and cash and term deposits were boring and old-fashioned. Of course, the world has changed since then, and now commentators talk of the ‘New Normal.’ They tell investors to get used to low returns on both shares and bonds, with greater price volatility.

But it’s not really that bad. A return of 7% doubles an investor’s money in 10 years. In Australia, it is possible to achieve this return in the corporate bond market, or using some of the listed hybrids (ignoring tax). Or with some Australian banks paying fully-franked dividends of about 6%, then an investment can double in 12 years, even if the share price is unchanged.

The rule can be used in reverse, if an investor wants a certain amount of money in a defined number of years, then the required rate of return can be calculated. This may require the investor to take more risk than, say, term deposits and cash, and of course, this may leave the investment goal thwarted. It’s all very well to desire to double money in 6 years, but 12% per annum is difficult to achieve without accepting significant risk.

Perhaps one reason why compounding receives less profile than it should is that few people can imagine what exponential growth looks like. It’s easier to think about simple interest. Consider the difference between simple and compound interest by looking at the interest earnings in each of the 10 years of compounding at 7%. In the first year, the interest on $100,000 is $7,000. This is the same for both simple interest and compound interest. But then in the second year, compound interest is earned on $107,000, which is $7,490, an increase of $490. In the tenth year, the interest earned is $13,000, almost double the first year.

The value of compounding makes starting saving early even more important. For example, with a basic savings plan spanning 40 years (say from starting work at 20 until retiring at 60) of $1,000 a year, the earnings will be double that of doing the same over only 30 years. It doesn’t seem intuitively obvious but that’s the power of compounding. Similarly, a borrower who does not pay off credit card debt will find the compound interest expense will eventually outweigh the original debt.

In recent research by the Centre for the Study of Choice, UTS and the Centre for Pensions and Superannuation, UNSW, 1200 Australians were studied for numeric skills and financial competence. About 30% could not answer a simple question on compounding, yet we will soon be asking them to commit 12% of their gross salary to a concept that relies on it. The study centres are looking into improving the ways superannuation funds communicate with their members, and it’s not acceptable to simply state that super is too complex to understand. Most people have to deal with more complicated issues in their work and life.

And one more delightful fact: in every doubling period – say if interest earned is 7%, every 10 years – more interest is earned in the last decade than in all the decades that proceeded it. For example, taking a long term exposure of say 50 years (a reasonable assumption with a large proportion of the population living to be 90 or 100), more is earned after the 40th year than in the sum of the first 40 years. This also highlights the financial benefits of delaying retirement.

Of course, any analysis of compounding that forms part of a financial plan should make allowances for tax and inflation. An investor with $500,000 who decides he needs $1 million dollars to retire may take some comfort from achieving this goal by investing at 7% for 10 years. But $500,000 today will have the same purchasing power as $672,000 in 10 years even with inflation at only 3%.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Set yourself to benefit from compounding

A steady road to getting rich

Shaky markets, steady mind

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

9 winning investment strategies

There are many ways to invest in stocks, but some strategies are more effective than others. Here are nine tried and tested investment approaches - choosing one of these can improve your chances of reaching your financial goals.

Latest Updates

Taxation

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

7 key charts on the state of the Australian property market

The Australian property market stirs fierce debate - often bullish optimism versus crash predictions. But beyond the noise, seven charts reveal what's really driving prices and the outlook for residential real estate.

A simple alternative to the $3 million super tax

Division 296 aims to introduce improved fairness into the superannuation system, yet is overly complex. This scours the world for better ideas and suggests a simpler alternative which can achieve the same goals.

CBA and the index conundrum for super funds

After the hyperbolic rise in CBA shares, super funds are floating the idea of carving out the weightings of ASX bank securities and indexing them within their portfolios. This looks at why that might be a big error.

Strategy

10 policies to drive Australian productivity higher

Here's a comprehensive list of proposed reforms to fix Australia's stagnating economy, including introducing a flat income tax rate, reducing migration, and making childcare tax-deductible.

Interviews

Where to find big winners in Asia

As more money looks for a home outside the US, Asia may soon get some love. Fidelity's Anthony Srom outlines the best places in Asia to invest, including in Chinese consumer names, Indian financials, and Thailand.

Investment strategies

We have trouble understanding the time value of money

We overvalue the present and underestimate the future - it’s a cognitive glitch called hyperbolic discounting. It affects savings, spending, and loans, and it's more common - and costly - than we think. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.