Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 346

What is the likely effect of COVID-19 on the Australian economy?

In late January, we outlined two possible scenarios for economic effect on the Australian economy due to the spread of Coronavirus (2019-nCov) subsequently re-named COVID-19. The first was a situation similar to SARS, albeit with some key differences. Despite the lower fatality rate, it appears COVID-19 spreads more easily, or has got a greater hold before it was discovered. While both outbreaks occurred in China, the Chinese economy is far larger and more globally integrated now than it was in 2003. This is due to many years of high growth rates, meaning the absolute effect of even a small decline in China's economic growth will be far more significant to a greater number of countries – particularly Australia. With SARS, the virus was contained and effectively eradicated over a nine-month period.

In the second more frightening scenario, the virus is not contained and becomes a situation like the H1N1 swine flu pandemic, where the virus circulates freely round the world. Estimates by the WHO and other reputable sources for the 2009 – 2010 H1N1 pandemic, put infection rates at 11% to 21% of the global population. Between 284,000 and 579,000 people died from H1N1 which proved fatal for 0.034% of those infected based on these numbers. The frightening difference is that COVID-19 seems to have a fatality rate closer to 2%, meaning it is approximately 60 times as deadly.

Initial scenarios morph into a third

At this stage the situation is still uncertain, but some variation between the two scenarios is seemingly becoming a more likely third option. While technically the virus is either contained and eradicated or not contained and becomes widespread, the third scenario is the virus is contained for an extended period of time, sufficient for treatments and vaccines to be developed before it becomes ‘not contained’.

Our logic in contemplating this third scenario is that experience on the Diamond Princess cruise ship indicates how contagious the virus appears to be where one person can cause the spread of the virus to over 600 people in just over two weeks - and this is despite quarantine efforts. Also of concern is once testing was extended from those people who had symptoms to those that did not, it became clear there were significant numbers of people who were infected but had no symptoms. If these people are contagious and able to infect others, then stopping the spread of the virus within communities will be extremely difficult.

The second fact supporting this argument is the number of infections in South Korea, Iran and Italy and to a lesser extent Singapore, Japan and Hong Kong where cases are rising. In these countries the virus has essentially ‘escaped’ in that efforts to trace all the people infected from an initial carrier have likely failed and the virus is now circulating in the community. If new cases cannot be isolated quickly enough, then the virus cannot be eradicated and will either continue to circulate at low levels for a long period; or, if it is highly contagious then number of infections will rise rapidly and more extreme ‘Wuhan-type’ measures will be necessary. Countries with currently contained infections will likely begin to institute travel bans (similar to the ones in force currently for China) on anyone coming from these places to other countries.

Economic disruption

Economically, the impact of steps to contain the virus being isolation, quarantine and travel restrictions are likely to be extremely disruptive. The full effects of factory shutdowns in China have abated to date as inventories have been run-down to cover production disruptions at a customer level and built up to avoid production disruptions at a supplier level.

However, this is a temporary situation and it is only recently the flow-on effects of the shutdowns on business in Hubei province have really begun to affect other parts of what is a very large and complex supply chain. It currently appears as if the restrictions will need to stay in place for much longer than initially forecast by optimists because the COVID-19 virus is both deadly and contagious.

Further as we've seen with the recent spread of the virus to other countries, efforts to contain it are likely to cause economic disruption locally, which may be mild at first but may become more severe over time if the virus continues to spread. For example, it would be fair to say the Tokyo Olympics are under threat of cancellation at this point if the local situation in Japan worsens in the next five months.

We predict this will have a greater effect on Australia than other countries because of our very close links to China and the facts that:

  1. China is our largest trading partner due to resource exports,
  2. one in four of our international students are from China and
  3. one in six of our tourists are from China.

It is not unthinkable the impact on Australia will be enough to cause negative GDP growth within our economy in both the first and second quarters of this calendar year. Of course, this is the technical definition of a recession and in such a circumstance the RBA will almost certainly look to cut interest rates from their current levels and also probably introduce other emergency measures as well.

This recession if it occurs will likely be different from many others experienced previously in that different parts of the Australian economy will be disproportionately affected. The three areas above are obvious ones, but secondarily airlines and the travel industry in general are likely to suffer greatly as the obvious method for Australia to protect itself is to stop the free movement of people between itself and infected areas, and as these grow, the list of countries with travel bans is only likely to increase in the short to medium term.

 

Moray Vincent is executive director Amicus Advisory, an independent fixed income research firm that provides advisory services to conservative wholesale credit investors. Operating since 2008, it currently has around $1.8 billion of funds under advice.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

China’s new model is a plan for a hostile world

Just how reliant on China are we?

Three reasons China could become the world’s leading consumer

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

Critics of franking credits are missing the main point. The taxable income of shareholders/taxpayers must also include the company tax previously paid to the ATO before the dividend was distributed. It is fair.

Latest Updates

Retirement

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Interviews

Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?

Compliance

D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.

Shares

Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.

Retirement

Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.