Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 179

Location, location, location! Is your ETF Australian domiciled?

Exchange traded funds (ETFs) that provide access to international markets, sectors and specific thematics continue to grow rapidly on the ASX, with now approximately 70 ETFs providing international equity exposures. International ETFs provide Australian investors with a simple and cost effective way to access growth opportunities, including under-represented (or even absent) sectors from the S&P/ASX200. However, as with any investment, it’s important to look at how the fund is structured. An often overlooked issue is the location or domicile of the fund, where the devil, of course, is in the detail.

Australian domiciled funds vs. CHESS Depository Interests (CDIs)

ETFs that invest in international (i.e. non-Australian) assets will generally come in one of two forms, largely indistinguishable on the surface but with quite different structures.

An Australian domiciled ETF is one that is formed, registered and regulated in Australia, is resident in Australia for tax purposes, and whose ‘home’ exchange is the ASX.

The alternative structure for international ETFs trading on the ASX is through a CHESS Depository Interest (CDI) in an already established offshore fund. In the case of ASX traded ETFs, all CDIs currently available are for funds based in the US. A CDI is a financial product quoted on the ASX which confers a beneficial interest in the underlying financial product to which it relates. A CDI will generally be listed by a global fund manager with an Australian presence and, though quoted on the ASX, it is actually a ‘cross-listing’ of the US fund.

Buying an interest in a fund that is domiciled in the US, for example, and cross-listed in Australia, presents certain considerations for investors:

  • Foreign governance: Offshore funds are governed primarily by the laws of the country of their original listing, not Australian law.
  • Additional administration: Because each CDI is an interest in the offshore fund, CDI holders are required to submit a W8-BEN form to the fund if they wish to reduce their withholdings tax (e.g. from 30% to 15% under the Australia-US double tax treaty). This is not a one-off and requires periodic updating.
  • Legal implications: Being governed primarily by foreign law, investors in offshore funds may have to contend with legislation that does not exist in Australia, such as potential US Estate Taxes for US domiciled investments.
  • Extra layer of withholdings tax – generally, an Australian resident holding a CDI on a US listed global exposure is subject to potential withholdings tax twice, ie from the foreign companies into the US and then into Australia.

By contrast, an investor in an Australian domiciled fund does not need to fill out individual W8-BEN forms because they are filled out once at the fund level, by the fund manager. Also, being governed primarily by Australian law, there are minimal, if any, direct foreign law impacts for investors. The investor is only subject to withholdings tax once on a global exposure – on the distributions from the foreign companies into Australia.

Australian domiciled or CDI? It’s worth ‘looking under the bonnet’ before you invest.

 

Adam O'Connor is Manager of Distribution at BetaShares. BetaShares is a sponsor of Cuffelinks and all their international funds are Australian-domiciled. This article does not consider the personal circumstances of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The challenges of building a lazy portfolio

Global ETFs: insights into a multi-trillion-dollar industry

Australian ETFs: end of year reviews 2018

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.