Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 168

Low SMSF returns highlight value of retirement advice

Much has been made of the current low-return environment and its potentially long-lasting consequences. People using retirement projection tools might find their return assumptions are unlikely to materialise.

In light of this uncertainty, retirees need to factor risk into their retirement planning, and advisers should make them aware of a range of investment outcomes.

Retirees can then use this information to decide when they can afford to retire, or what level of spending they can sustain over the course of their retirement.

2015 SMSF returns and fund balances

Research conducted by Accurium and the SMSF Association of over 65,000 SMSFs looked at how the retirement adequacy of Australia’s SMSF trustees has changed over the 2015 financial year. The study found the median balance for two-member SMSFs increased by 3.0% over the year to $1.1 million, based on a median investment return of 4.2%. This is lower than the average return over the previous five years of 6.2% per annum for the SMSFs in the study.

Chart 1: Median SMSF balances and investment returns as at 30 June

Note: Imputed investment returns are calculated net of administration expenses and gross of income tax. These imputed investment returns should not be used in comparisons with other superannuation sectors.

Fewer SMSFs are large enough for comfortable standard

The research used Accurium’s healthcheck to determine retirement adequacy, a retirement projection model that considers 2,000 economic and demographic scenarios and provides estimates of the savings needed to afford different lifestyles with different levels of confidence.

The research found that a 65-year-old couple will need $702,000 in savings to be confident of affording the ASFA Comfortable Retirement Standard, which is currently $58,922 per annum for 65-year-old couples. This is at the 80% confidence level, meaning retirees still have a one in five chance of outliving their savings. It also assumes an asset mix consistent with the ATO average for SMSFs in pension phase. Age pension entitlements, tax and superannuation settings are allowed for.

The results are testament to the success of the SMSFs in the sample, given about 70% of the couples in the research have enough in their funds to afford this lifestyle. However, that comes with an important caveat. Lower-than-average returns in 2015, together with a weaker economic outlook, mean fewer SMSF couples are in this fortunate position compared with a year ago, where 75% were on track for a comfortable retirement.

Lower expected returns are also affecting those aspiring to a higher standard of retirement living. For example, the study found a 65-year-old SMSF couple will need $1,886,000 in savings to be reasonably confident of having an income of $100,000 p.a, as shown in Chart 2. The proportion of 65-year-old SMSF couples with sufficient assets in their SMSFs to support this lifestyle has fallen from 34% to 29% over the past year. (Spending levels are assumed to keep pace with inflation, and allow for changing circumstances as retirees age. Specifically, spending is assumed to reduce by 10% once retirees reach age 85 and to drop by 30% once one spouse passes away).

Chart 2: Savings needed for different spending levels with 80% confidence vs. median SMSF balance

SMSF retirees can also achieve higher retirement living standards with savings outside of superannuation. However, the study highlights the need for trustees either in or preparing for retirement to review their plans.

The research also analysed the sustainability of individual SMSF households’ retirement plans based on their desired spending levels and their savings, both inside and outside their SMSF. Of the 1,500 households in the study, three in five could be reasonably confident that their savings would last as long as they do.

Our study also found a clear correlation between wealth and sustainability. It might seem intuitive that those with more wealth are more likely to sustain their desired retirement spending levels. However, the study revealed that SMSF retirees do not automatically increase their spending in line with greater wealth.

Value of retirement risk advice

SMSF trustees and their advisers need to assess their plans before and during retirement, including how much trustees need to spend per annum, how to meet essential expenditure and how to adjust asset allocations as a response to lower-yielding markets.

To do this effectively, advisers, or those going it alone, need the right projection tools (such as Accurium’s retirement healthcheck) that don’t just use average returns and lifespans, to consider a range of outcomes. To access Accurium’s research paper SMSF Retirement Insights: Are trustees prepared for retirement?, prepared in conjunction with the SMSF Association, click here.


Melanie Dunn is SMSF Technical Services Manager at Accurium. This article is information only and illustrates the value of providing retirement risk advice to SMSF trustees and is not intended to be financial product advice, legal advice or tax advice, and should not be relied upon as such. Advisers and SMSF trustees may need to seek appropriate professional advice.


August 11, 2016

Like Paul, I am retired with a wife, and no family living with us. We own our own home worth nearly $1m, bought for cash, and have a dividend income from shares and other interest paying investments from our SMSF of about $300k/ free. The occasional profitable sales are also tax free.
We also own shares outside the SMSF environment, but could live very comfortably without these, while watching the SMSF portfolio increase in value by >15%/yr.
So we are one family which is very happy with the SMSF environment, and find it difficult to be too critical of the government's attempt to curb what is basically a rort.

Gen Y
August 12, 2016

Richard, it is great that someone is calling it for what it is. There's been a lot of bashing of the Government's proposed changes on this site based on vested interests.

August 11, 2016

Our SMSF is pretty much our sole source of retirement capital and income.
It is all invested in direct shares which I research. At 58 we are both retired and the fund now generates just over $100,000 in ff dividends and $43,000 in refunded franking credits; with both figures still growing thanks to some great mid & small cap businesses.
That's over $140,000 pa without selling one share.
We have a $150,000 term deposit 'insurance ' fund if divs get cut due to another GFC type event.
To be honest we are struggling to spend this annual income; let alone sell anything.
Very 'doable.'

August 11, 2016

^^^ Depends on where you live, as a 20 year Financial Planner we have bulk of our retired clients on or around this income level with combination of Private and DSS funded pensions. These people aren't traveling overseas each year, but are comfortable by their own definition.

August 11, 2016

I agree entirely with Ashley, on both counts.

August 11, 2016

I have never met anyone who has their SMSF as their sole source of retirement capital and income. I have never met any SMSF investor who is happy with the ASFA retirement income levels. – eg who would be ‘comfortable’ on $58,922 pa?


Leave a Comment:



Avoid these top five errors in your SMSF annual return

What is happening with SMSFs? Part 1

8 hints for any SMSF in both accumulation and pension modes


Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Australia’s bounty: is it just diversified luck?

Increases in commodity prices have fuelled global inflation while benefiting commodities exporters like Australia. Oftentimes, booms lead to busts and investors need to get the timing right on pricing cycles to be successful.

Meg on SMSFs – More on future-proofing your fund

Single-member SMSFs face challenges where the eventual beneficiaries (or support team in the event of incapacity) will be the member’s adult children. Even worse, what happens if one or more of the children live overseas?

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Five features of a fair performance fee, including a holiday

Most investors pay little attention to the performance fee on their fund but it can have a material impact on returns, especially if the structure is unfair. Check for these features and a coming fee holiday.


Ned Bell on why there’s a generational step change underway

During market dislocation events, investors react irrationally and it should be a great environment for active management. The last few years have been an easy ride on tech stocks but it's now all about quality.  

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Powers of attorney for your fund

Granting an enduring power of attorney is an important decision for the trustees of an SMSF. There are alternatives and protections to consider including who should perform this vital role and when.


The great divergence: the evolution of the 'magnetic' workplace

The pandemic profoundly impacted the way we use real estate but in a post-pandemic environment, tenant preferences and behaviours are now providing more certainty to the outlook of our major real estate sectors.


Bank reporting season scorecard May 2022

A key feature of the May results for the banking sector was profits trending back to pre-Covid-19 levels, thanks to lower than expected unemployment and the growth in house prices.

Why gender diversity matters for investors

Companies with a boys’ club approach to leadership are a red flag for investors. On the other hand, companies that walk the talk on women in leadership roles perform better, potentially making them better investments. 


Is it all falling apart for central banks?

Central banks are unable to ignore the inflation in front of them, but underlying macro-economic conditions indicate that inflation may be transitory and the consequences of monetary tightening dangerous.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.