Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 21

Managing for real returns

I have previously made the case that real return outcomes are crucial for those saving for retirement and living off their retirement savings. Yet institutional super funds do not explicitly manage the risk of real return outcomes. The typical mix of assets in a default super fund results in the risk to real outcomes (that is, the returns adjusted for inflation and the more important outcome) being greater than the risk to nominal outcomes (that is, returns before adjusting for inflation, a less important outcome). This article explores the concept of managing for real returns.

In a nominal return portfolio construction framework, investors think of the major asset classes as follows: cash is our risk-free asset, bonds are a defensive asset class which should perform well in a difficult economic environment, and equities are a growth asset which participates (less consistently than you may think) in the strength of the broader economy.

As a result we see higher levels of risk, as displayed in the rolling nominal return volatility table below. Table 1 below looks at the volatility of annualised returns for both nominal and real outcomes over a period from 1900 to 2012.

Table 1: Volatility of annualised returns for different asset classes (1 January 1900 to 31 January 2012).

Asset Class Volatility (Nominal) Volatility (Real)
Cash 3.9% 5.4%
Domestic Bonds 10.7% 12.1%
Australian Equities 17.7% 17.7%
Global Equities (unhedged) 18.7% 17.6%

Source: Schroders; “Why SAA is Flawed?” March 2012, Schroder Investment Management.

The nominal results are in accordance with the expectations described above. However, the returns from bonds and cash have, over the very long term, been more volatile than one may expect, since the last 20 years has been a period of low volatility for these asset classes. Once we switch our mindsets to focusing on the risk to real return outcomes, the risk profile changes:

  • The historical real return from cash is more volatile than the nominal return, which may surprise, given the current setting we have become accustomed to whereby the Reserve Bank adjusts the cash rate to control medium term inflation.
  • The return profile of nominal bonds becomes more volatile when viewed from a real return perspective rather than a nominal return perspective. The reason why is that in high inflation environments it is common to see nominal bond yields rise (based on inflation expectations). Rising bond yields results in falling bond prices so investors in bonds may take two hits in an inflationary environment: the purchasing power of their capital falls (due to rising inflation), and the value of their nominal portfolio falls.
  • The return profile of equities remains volatile when outcomes are viewed in real terms. There is no clear pattern whether companies are able to pass on input cost increases (including labour). Indeed there are many other factors at play such as government policy and macroeconomic effects such as changes to exchange rates and interest rates. So we see the volatility of real outcomes remain high.

Overall, when we are focused on managing the risk to real return outcomes we are considering outcomes relative to inflation. In this sense inflation becomes what we call the numèraire (the basis for comparison). Observing and hence managing nominal return risk assessment is easier because risk is measured as variability in the nominal outcomes. When considering real return risk assessment, we need to consider the nominal return against the inflation outcome. That is why nominal bonds appear more risky in a real return context: they often experience negative returns at the same time that inflation is high (so a double whammy), as illustrated previously.

In terms of other assets and investment strategies:

  • Inflation-linked bonds are often viewed as a low risk investment when we are focusing on real return outcomes. However this is only true over a long term holding period. Over shorter periods of time indexed bonds often have very long maturities and carry significant duration risk, so the short term variability in the bond price may be quite large even though the risk to inflation outcomes is offset by the indexation of the coupons payments. This is an important consideration if you have a range of investors in a fund all retiring at different times (we call this sequencing risk, as discussed in Cuffelinks on 6 March 2013).
  • Real assets are often regarded as good inflation hedges. Examples include property and infrastructure where the income stream may be linked to inflation. However the real outcomes could still be volatile due to other factors. For example, if interest rates rise significantly in response to inflation, the asset price may fall if based on a discounted cash flow technique.
  • Investments in commodities are also viewed as inflation hedges. There is logic to this argument but there will still be large variability as there are many supply and demand factors (besides inflation) which affect commodity prices.

Overall the challenge of managing real outcome risk is significant. Managing real outcome risk is more complex than managing for nominal outcomes (because the numèraire, inflation, is itself a variable quantity). It creates the challenge to think more strategically about inflation itself and the role of each potential investment in different inflationary environments. The starting point of a real return focussed asset allocation framework would be:

  • Create expectations of real returns for each asset class. For each asset consider the underlying ability for its return stream to change with inflation.
  • Consider the risk to real return outcomes for each asset class. How could each asset class perform in different inflationary environments?
  • Consider the likelihood for the inflationary setting to change.

I’m yet to see any super funds that explicitly manage for real outcomes. There is also an opportunity for asset consultants to frame their asset allocation advice in this manner as well. There are some managed funds in the real return or target return space that are heading down this path. There is a significant leadership opportunity for super funds to manage real return risk and ultimately improve the outcomes of those in Australia’s retirement income system, where the inflation risk represents a potential erosion of their retirement outcomes.

This is the third of three articles which makes the case that we need to have a greater focus on real return outcomes. Simply stated, real return outcomes are more volatile than nominal outcomes, and of course have been lower. However there is a dangerous tail risk element evident as well, due to periods of higher inflation. By explicitly targeting real return risk we are better positioned to manage the risk that most directly relates to retirement outcomes.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Hold the champagne, that’s not a recovery yet

The utmost importance of real returns - but does the industry care?

The role of financial markets when earnings are falling

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.