Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 371

The role of financial markets when earnings are falling

Over the years, the financial services industry has become needlessly complicated. Ultimately, investing still boils down to an exchange of capital today for cash flows tomorrow. Weaker balance sheets and income statements, dubious earnings assumptions and soaring bankruptcies demonstrate that a challenging investment environment lies ahead, but market pricing doesn’t reflect that outlook. Everything is rising in value because there is excess capital chasing too few opportunities.

Is that the role of financial markets?

Capital should be allocated more responsibly than that. The financial services industry of today looks quite different from a century ago, but its role in society has not changed. Back then, investing was the province of wealthy individuals and large institutions until companies such as MFS helped democratise markets and give small investors greater access to investments. At its core, investing is simple. It’s an exchange of capital today in return for a cash flow from a company or government in the future.

Against that backdrop, let’s take a look at what the price of risk is implying about future cash flows, though at this point it’s questionable whether the average investor even cares.

Weaker balance sheets and income statements

Long before the onset of the pandemic, worldwide profit margins had peaked and were contracting. Balance sheet quality was poor and deteriorating before the coronavirus spread around the world. Battling the spread of the COVID-19 forced a sharp curtailment of global economic activity in the first quarter, prompting companies to plug revenue gaps by issuing historic amounts of debt, materially weakening already fragile balance sheets.

At the same time, companies will incur incremental costs to minimise health risks for employees and customers, while many will also have to reorient supply chains to emphasise resiliency after many years of focusing more heavily on wringing out costs. This will weigh on income statements for those unable to offset higher costs with either higher prices or greater volumes. The resulting increased capital investment will lower return on working capital for years to come. In short, future cash flows are likely to underwhelm.

Fuzzy earnings maths

If companies are more indebted, have higher operating costs and greater output yet final demand remains below 2019 levels, how do the market’s implied 2021 operating earnings compute? Profits are not linear and the last few customers are always the most profitable. Scale matters immensely.

Absent revenue growth that is materially better than it was 2019, I honestly cannot make the earnings maths work.

Let’s look at this through a different lens. On annualised basis, the US economy contracted by a third this past quarter, a level materially worse than any quarter during the GFC.

The graph above illustrates that the number of sizable bankruptcy filings is on pace to exceed any year since the GFC. This makes sense to me. The imbalance in the real economy leading up to the 2008 recession was over-leveraged financial institutions. The imbalance was largely concentrated in one industry. This allowed the subsequent earnings recovery to be historically fast because most other sector constituents did not require equity recapitalisation.

How is 2020 different?

The weak economic recovery following the GFC and the central bank stimulus undertaken as a result of the weak rebound created more widespread imbalances during the just-ended cycle. The accommodative monetary backdrop afforded companies with weak revenues to substitute borrowed cash flows for operating cash flows. Unlike 2008, the 2020 crisis is one of over-leveraged businesses across many industries and sectors. The pandemic is the excuse often used for weak financial results, while the cause was soft demand heading into 2020, balance sheet fragility and financial engineering. As a result, I expect more bankruptcies during this recession and a weaker-than-normal recovery in overall profitability.

Why are financial markets signalling otherwise?

The honest answer is: who knows? I can offer this perspective.

While there are numerous asset classes for investors to choose from these days: growth or value equities, large versus small capitalisation stocks, developed market corporate bonds or developing, etc., ultimately there is only one asset class: volatility. Most financial assets are effectively short volatility, as they benefit when markets anticipate increasing certainty and stability. Conversely, they suffer when conditions deteriorate.

Assets such as US Treasuries or gold, on the other hand, are effectively long volatility and benefit from greater uncertainty. But lately, as policymakers have injected capital into financial markets to fund operating losses and suppress the cost of risk, the correlation between short and long volatility assets has gone from negative to positive. Today, everything is rising in value because there is excess capital chasing too few opportunities. Is that the role of financial markets? Capital should be allocated more responsibly than that.

Patience and skilled security selection and a focus on fundamentals are more important now than ever as the outlook for future cash flow deteriorates.

 

Robert M. Almeida is a Global Investment Strategist and Portfolio Manager at MFS Investment Management. This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Comments, opinions and analysis are rendered as of the date given and may change without notice due to market conditions and other factors. This article is issued in Australia by MFS International Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 68 607 579 537, AFSL 485343), a sponsor of Firstlinks.

For more articles and papers from MFS, please click here.

Neither Bloomberg nor Barclays approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein.

Unless otherwise indicated, logos and product and service names are trademarks of MFS® and its affiliates and may be registered in certain countries.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Why ESG assessment must now consider active ownership

Beware of burning down the barn to bury the debt

Amid vaccine hope and skepticism, testing is key

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.