Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 496

Meg on SMSFs: Is it better to wait until July to start your pension?

In a monthly column to assist trustees, specialist Meg Heffron explores major issues on managing your SMSF.

There has been plenty of media over the last few weeks about the fact that the 'transfer balance cap' will increase to $1.9 million from 1 July 2023.

This is the limit on how much anyone can put into a super pension after they retire. It started at $1.6 million in 2017 and increased to $1.7 million in 2021. The next leap will be to $1.9 million but only those who don’t start any pensions until 1 July 2023 receive the full increase. Someone who starts a pension now and uses up their full limit of $1.7 million won’t see any increase in July.

So many retirees with high super balances who were about to start pensions in their SMSFs are wondering if they should wait.

Weighing up various scenarios

Believe it or not, it depends.

One of the benefits of starting a pension as soon as possible is that the fund stops paying income tax on some or all of its investment earnings (dividends, rent, interest, capital gains etc).

Consider an SMSF with a single member, Joel, who has $2 million in super. Let’s say Joel started a pension on 1 February 2023 with as much as possible at the time, $1.7 million. At the end of the year, an actuary will work out what proportion of the fund’s investment income is exempt from tax in that first year. It’s likely to be around 35% of all the income it earned during 2022/23 (even the rent, dividends, interest, gains etc. that it earned before the pension started).

Note that next year the percentage will be even higher, around 85%. It’s lower in the first year to reflect the fact that the pension didn’t start until the year was well progressed.

If the pension doesn’t start until 1 July 2023, the SMSF (and therefore the member) will miss out on this tax break. So what is it worth?

That depends on how much income the fund earns in 2022/23. And remember we only look at the income that is taxed. The growth in the value of assets doesn’t count unless the assets are sold because only realised capital gains are taxed.

Let’s say Joel’s SMSF earned $100,000 in rent, interest, dividends etc. during 2022/23. This equates to 5% of its assets. If Joel’s pension started on 1 February 2023, the fund skips paying tax on 35% of this, or $35,000. As super funds pay tax at 15%, the value of the tax break is 15% x $35,000, i.e. $5,250.

On the flipside, what would be gained by waiting for the transfer balance cap to go up before starting the pension?

Joel will put an extra $200,000 into his pension and it will start at $1.9 million rather than $1.7 million. That means in future years the fund will receive an even higher tax break on its investment income.

For example, if the pension started at $1.7 million in 2022/23, the SMSF will be able to treat around 85% of its income as exempt from tax in 2023/24. It would be closer to 95% if the pension started at $1.9 million on 1 July 2023.

So what’s that worth?

If we assume that the fund earns about the same taxable investment income in 2023/24 (say $100,000), the benefit of waiting is around $1,500. I worked this out by saying: the fund can treat an extra 10% (95% - 85%) of its income as being exempt from tax (10% x $100,000 is $10,000). Since super funds pay tax at 15%, Joel’s fund will save $1,500 (15% x $10,000) in the first year if he doesn’t start his pension until 1 July 2023.

Then some saving like this will happen in every subsequent year. If we wait long enough, it’s highly likely that waiting will be a better option.

But a few points leap out.

Firstly, the saving is quite small. So those who started their pensions in 2022/23 need not feel they have made a tragic error. Even if we model for five, 10 or 15 years into the future allowing for variables that impact the calculations (for example, future investment returns, pension drawings, inflation and more), waiting is better by thousands or tens of thousands of dollars but not hundreds of thousands.

Secondly, it will take three to four years before the savings from waiting until 1 July 2023 add up to more than the savings from starting on 1 February. A lot could happen in that time.

Other things to consider

In this comparison, we’re looking at someone starting a pension in February with five months left in the current financial year and a high percentage of tax-exempt income (35%). As we move closer to the end of the year, the decision will be easier - waiting until July will be better. That’s because the actuarial percentage is lower if the pension doesn’t start until later in the year. Someone starting in June, for example, will have virtually none of the fund’s income treated as being exempt from tax in 2022/23. They have nothing to gain by starting early.

It depends on how much taxable income the fund earns this year versus next year. What if this SMSF had sold a large asset and made a big capital gain in 2022/23? Perhaps the fund’s taxable investment income is normally around $100,000 but this year it will be $300,000? In that case, the member should probably start their pension as soon as possible to make sure that 35% of $300,000 ($105,000) is exempt from tax, saving $15,750 in 2022/23. If the fund’s income reverts to normal in the subsequent years, it will take many years of $1,500 savings to make delaying more attractive.

Overall, I would say that – all other things being equal – waiting is probably better but not by as much as it might appear. Certainly, it will take a while to feel that way and it’s worth doing the calculations to be sure.

 

Meg Heffron is the Managing Director of Heffron SMSF Solutions, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This is general information only and it does not constitute any recommendation or advice. It does not consider any personal circumstances and is based on an understanding of relevant rules and legislation at the time of writing.

For more articles and papers from Heffron, please click here.

 

5 Comments
mp
February 20, 2023

Hi Meg, would you be kind to enlighten, pls.tq. I am the sole member of my smsf. I am in my 60s and I am working part time as I am still enjoying my work. Because of my wages from part time work and savings outside of smsf, I dont presently need to start a pension. I would exhaust my savings and wages before starting this pension. Is there a dateline for my smsf to start paying me pension ? Shd I start this pension, what is the legislated minimum pension payment per year ? Once this pension is started, the payment cannot be paused for any given year ?

Mark
February 18, 2023

Hi Meg, the calculations are definitely worth doing. They are particularly relevant when also using the re-contribution strategy to impact the tax free % for the member given that it would allow another $440K of NCCs to be ploughed into the fund over a relatively short period (current TSB allowing) since the relevant caps to allow contributions will also be increasing on 1 July.

Ant
February 20, 2023

Is this increase of caps true? They are linked to wage increases not CPI.

Mark
February 22, 2023

Hi Ant, the $440K is made up of $110K before June 30 followed by $330K next year using the 3 year bring forward rule. I’m presuming this is what you are referring to. The amounts are linked to wage increases as you suggest.

Jack
February 16, 2023

Thanks, Meg, I had not thought through how there are examples of where it might be better not to wait.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: Four ways super pensions are better in SMSFs

Meg on SMSFs: Tips for the last member standing

Meg on SMSFs: At last, movement on legacy pensions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.