Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 627

Noise cancelling for investors

Investors have never had more information at their fingertips. Newsfeeds refresh by the second, financial TV runs on a 24-hour loop, and social media is engineered to keep us clicking. Even the newest tools of our time, large language models like ChatGPT, can serve up an articulate answer in seconds.

But this abundance is misleading. Most of it is noise — forgettable snippets with a half-life of hours. Headlines are designed not to inform but to funnel us deeper into a product or subscription. LLMs (Large Language Models), for all their fluency, are built to support and flatter our prompts, not to reason with originality or forecast with accuracy. They cannot yet do the one thing that defines good investing: to pause, weigh evidence, and think independently at the second level.

We aren’t ready to hand over the reins of rational, deep, or creative thought. Not yet.

The retreat from noise

The greatest investors of our time understood this long before the digital deluge. They deliberately engineered their environments to cultivate clarity.

  • Warren Buffett chose Omaha over Wall Street so he could think in peace. He still spends most of his day reading quietly, with no interruptions.
  • Charlie Munger built his reputation on inversion — focusing on avoiding folly rather than chasing brilliance. That, too, requires quiet.
  • Nick Sleep and Qais Zakaria, founders of the Nomad Partnership, ran their fund from a small room above a Chinese herbalist in Chelsea, London. They didn’t even have desks or Bloomberg terminals,  just reading chairs. In that simplicity, they compounded at more than 20% a year for a decade.
  • Bill Miller, a philosophy grad and military intelligence officer prior to being a fund manager, thought about markets differently. When the dot-com crash drove the consensus to declare Amazon worthless, Miller tuned out the noise and doubled down. He became the largest shareholder without the surname Bezos, setting off one of the most remarkable market-beating streaks in history.
  • Guy Spier retreated to Zurich, creating what he calls a “temple of calm.” His environment was designed to encourage slow, deliberate thought rather than reactive decision-making.

As William Green describes in Richer, Wiser, Happier, the edge is not in doing more, but in doing less — subtraction. Jason Zweig once wrote to him about Munger, Miller, and Buffett: “Their skill is self-honesty. They don’t lie to themselves about what they are and aren’t good at. Being honest with yourself like that has to be part of the secret. It’s so hard and so painful to do, but so important.”

In other words, these investors protect their minds. They filter out what doesn’t matter so they can focus on what does.

Hagstrom and the art of thinking slowly

No writer has captured this better than Robert Hagstrom, author of The Warren Buffett Way and Investing: The Last Liberal Art. Hagstrom argues that modern markets are awash with static — countless signals generated by traders, algorithms, momentum players, and macro tourists. He borrows from Claude Shannon’s theory of communication: when too much noise overwhelms the channel, the message is lost.

Hagstrom’s answer is not speed but slowness. He urges investors to treat investing as a liberal art — drawing on philosophy, psychology, and history, not just financial models. His practice is one of calm reading, thinking, and synthesising across disciplines. That is the true contrarian act in a world addicted to immediacy.

Or as he once put it: “We are not in the information business, we are in the thinking business.”

Behaviour before analysis

Closer to home, Howard Coleman of Teaminvest makes a similar point: unless you can manage your behaviour, analysis won’t save you. The ability to tune out noise — to avoid being swayed by every market twitch — is the precondition for considered judgment.

Second-level thinking

The distinction is clear. First-level thinking reacts to the market: “The stock is down, it must be bad.” Second-level thinking goes deeper: “Why is it down? Has the intrinsic value changed? Or is this just fear?”

Second-level thinking doesn’t emerge from speed or more data. It grows in environments designed for patience, honesty, and reflection. It requires subtraction, not addition.

The real edge

What unites Buffett in Omaha, Sleep and Zakaria in their reading chairs, Miller in his contrarian conviction, Spier in his Zurich office, and Munger in his relentless inversion is not access to faster information. It is the courage to avoid noise.

Their edge wasn’t derived from consuming more. It was from doing less, more deeply. In the calm, they found clarity. And in clarity, they won.

 

Leigh Gant is the Founder and CEO at Unio Growth Partners. This article is for general information purposes only as it does not consider the individual circumstances of any person. Investors should seek professional investment advice before acting.

 

  •   3 September 2025
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Does increasing geopolitical risk lead to higher equity market returns?

Shaky markets, steady mind

The 9 most important things I've learned about investing over 40 years

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.