Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 412

Not so plastic fantastic: solving the single-use pandemic

We continue to hear more about the circular economy and how businesses can maximise their use of finite resources while minimising external pressures on our environment. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation has a great report titled “The New Plastics Economy, Rethinking the Future of Plastics” which highlights environmental concerns, along with potential solutions, regarding our use of the “ubiquitous workhorse material”, plastics.

Only 5% of plastic is properly recycled

The report highlights that while plastics deliver highly functional properties at a very low cost, the drawbacks are becoming increasingly apparent. Approximately 95% of plastic packaging material value, or US$80-120 billion annually, is lost to the economy due to its short first use cycle.

More than 40 years after the launch of the first universal recycling symbol, only 14% of plastic packaging is collected for recycling. When additional value losses in sorting and reprocessing are factored in, only 5% of material value is retained for subsequent use.

More worrying is the likely acceleration of this trend. The report highlights that currently at least 8 million tonnes of plastics leak into the ocean each year, the equivalent to one garbage truck every minute. If no action is taken, this is expected to increase to two trucks per minute by 2030 and four per minute by 2050. This is unsustainable and while the plastics economy is highly fragmented, the collection and recycling infrastructure must rise to help minimise this issue.

Fortunately, this issue is high on the agenda of business, governments and individuals and the general consensus is that the response needs to be accelerated but the question is how and at what cost.

Single use plastics are, as the title suggests, only used once or for a short period of time before being discarded. Consumers are increasingly rejecting the use of single use plastics prompting governments around the world to implement regulations. 

The EU Directive was passed in July 2019 with the stated aim:

“to prevent and reduce the impact on the environment of certain plastic products and to promote a transition to a circular economy by introducing a mix of measures tailored to the products covered by the directive, including an EU-wide ban on single-use plastic products whenever alternatives are available”.

Plastics and business risks

Given the short lifecycle, single use plastics are more likely to be found in our oceans and the European Union estimates that 70% of all marine litter is attributable to these 10 most commonly found single use plastic items:

  • Cotton bud sticks
  • Cutlery, plates, straws and stirrers
  • Balloons and sticks for balloons
  • Food containers
  • Cups for beverages
  • Beverage containers
  • Cigarette butts
  • Plastic bags
  • Packets and wrappers
  • Wet wipes and sanitary items

The first-ever Europe-wide strategy on plastics is a part of the transition towards a more circular economy which is focused on sustainable, nontoxic reusable products and reuse systems rather than to single use products in an effort to reduce the quantity of waste generated. Beverage bottles are one of the most common forms of litter in the EU.

In our view, any consumer branded product utilising plastics and not addressing this issue will face significant long-term business risk or conversely, develop long-term consumer loyalty if dealt with properly.

Blue Planet II aired in 2017 and since then consumers have been vocally against the irresponsible applications associated with single-use plastic. As David Attenborough stated in his closing remarks in Blue Planet:

“We are at unique stage in our history. Never before have we had such an awareness of what we are doing to the planet, and never before have we had the power to do something about that. Surely we have a responsibility to care for our blue planet. The future of humanity, and indeed all life on Earth, now depends on us."

Investment opportunities 

We have investments in companies which are at the forefront of addressing this issue however the most relevant to consumer packaging is our investment in SIG Combibloc which is based in Switzerland. SIG understands that consumers want to be loyal to a brand which clearly communicates its green efforts while being totally transparent about its processes. 

According to the 2018 European Consumer Packaging Perceptions Survey of 7,000 shoppers, three quarters of consumers now say the environmental impact of a product’s packaging affects their purchasing decisions and 90% want packaging to be easily recyclable.

To analyse the carbon footprint of its carton packs, SIG commissioned independent experts to conduct lifecycle assessments. In every assessment, the lifecycle carbon footprint of a carton pack was found to be significantly lower than other packaging alternatives - by as much as up to 70%:

Source: SIG


Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

SIG cartons are made from 70-80% liquid packaging board (LPB), which comes from wood, a bio-based and renewable resource. Trees can grow quickly and be regenerated at a sustainable rate, absorbing carbon dioxide as they grow. This means the LPB in its packs, which are allowed to carry the Forest Stewardship Council™ certification label (licence code: FSC™ C020428), has a very low carbon footprint compared with other packaging materials such as plastic (PET).

All the materials in SIG cartons can be recovered and recycled. Carton board is often used to make high-grade tissue, helping that product shrink its carbon footprint. This is because recycled materials need less energy to produce than virgin materials. 

SIG has already taken steps towards a 100% renewable pack by creating combibloc EcoPlus - an aseptic packaging solution that has a significantly smaller lifecycle carbon footprint than the standard aseptic pack. By using a different material structure, it has eliminated aluminium, replacing it with an ultra-thin polyamide layer. This increases the share of renewable materials in the pack from 75% to 82% and cuts the carbon footprint by up to 28%.

Source: SIG

The key takeaway here is that consumers are demanding environmentally friendly packaging products, governments are regulating and limiting the use of harmful plastics and consumer branded businesses are adopting new innovative solutions. Hopefully we can show the Earth she can depend on us.

 

Bill Pridham is a Portfolio Manager at Ellerston Capital. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Three key trends and the power of investing in decarbonisation

The green lining of COVID-19: a time for change

Unseen environmental costs of companies

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.