Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 100

Do you plan to be a ‘have’ or a ‘have not’?

The latest Intergenerational Report (IGR) contains some scary statistics. Within 40 years the life expectancy of the average male will be 95.5 years, and for a female 96.6 years. The population will be almost 40 million and include more than 40,000 people aged over 100.

There is nothing really new in this. For more than 35 years, there have been warnings galore about the problems that will come when the baby boomers start to leave the workforce. These people, born between 1946 and 1964, are now aged between 69 and 51 - the oldest of them are either retired or thinking about it.

Their exit from the workforce will cause labour shortages, and put pressure on wages as employers compete for a dwindling number of workers. Furthermore, their increasing need for health services will cause immense challenges for an already stretched health sector.

Adversarial politics creates inaction

Governments of all persuasions have long been aware of this ticking time bomb, but thanks to the adversarial nature of politics, there has been a lot of talk but not much action. In 1997 the Howard Government tried to fix the crisis in the nursing home industry by introducing accommodation bonds. Labor ran such a successful scare campaign the scheme was dropped.

For example, in budget after budget there have been attempts to address the rising cost of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme which in 2007/2008 delivered 170 million prescriptions at a cost of $6.6 billion. In 2006 the Howard Government laid out a four year reform package that was designed to save $3 billion over ten years, and in the 2008/2009 Budget the Rudd Government introduced new therapeutic groups aimed at driving down the cost of drugs. Still the costs escalate, and in 2013/2014 exceeded $9 billion.

The first IGR was included in the 2002/2003 budget, and a second report was released in 2007 and a third in 2010. Every time a new IGR is released we hear statements from the government of the day that we face massive problems in the future unless we make big changes to our tax and welfare system in the short to medium term. Unfortunately there is more talk than action.

The time to act is now

The good news from the latest IGR is that average annual income is expected to rise from $66,400 to $117,300, which will boost the property and share markets. The bad news is that there will be just 2.7 people aged between 15 and 64 — potential taxpayers — for every person aged 65 and over.

It is a wake-up call for every Australian. If you are under 40, you have time for compound interest to work its magic, which should enable you to build a decent portfolio if you start now and choose the right mix of growth assets. You will need this portfolio because you may well live to 100, at which time the age pension is certain to be severely restricted.

If you are between 40 and 65 you cannot afford to rely solely on employer-paid superannuation. The age at which you can access the age pension is being raised, and there are calls to also raise the superannuation age to 67 to match. The best strategy for you is to salary sacrifice to the maximum, and hone your skills so that you can work as long as possible. This will increase the power of compounding and make your money last longer, as it will delay the time you need to start making withdrawals.

Are you already over 65? Don’t panic. Any changes to the age pension will come in gradually, and are certain to be grandfathered. However, you need to be getting good financial advice to ensure your money works as hard as realistically possible. The alternative is to face the challenge of living longer than your money.

Where will the taxes come from?

The following case study illustrates the difficulty facing any government trying to get the budget back on track. Think about a single income couple with two children aged 8 and 10, where the primary breadwinner earns $75,000 a year. The income tax on this would be around $16,000, but the family's contribution to the national coffers would be just $9,000 after family payments of $7,000 a year are taken into account. If we assume the cost of the full age pension for a couple is $36,000 a year when healthcare concessions are factored in, it takes four such single income families (or eight adults of working age) to support one pensioner couple.

This imbalance will become worse as the ratio of dependants to workers grows over time. Our taxation system presents grave challenges too. Currently, 61% of personal income tax is received from a mere 11% of adults, leaving the bulk contributing very little. In addition, 87% of those aged 65 and over pay no personal income tax whatsoever.

NW Figure1 130315

NW Figure1 130315

Source: Philo Capital

A full review of our tax and welfare system is overdue, but the adversarial nature of politics does not make for optimism. Right now, the federal government reminds me of a dysfunctional family. Dad and Mum (the two major parties) spend all their time abusing each other and promising the world to their constituents (us, the children) while well-meaning but inexperienced relations (the minor parties) add to the turmoil by telling the kids that their parents don't know what they are talking about.

Unless you have more faith than I do that politicians of all parties will be able to solve these problems over the next 40 years, you should be making every effort to work as long as possible to accumulate as much as you possibly can for your retirement. Australia is moving inexorably to a society of haves and have nots. Despite a lot of rhetoric from our politicians, it will be the haves who will be first in line for medical care as the queues for health services grow.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. His advice is general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions. See www.noelwhittaker.com.au

5 Comments
AndrewH
March 17, 2015

An autocracy that was all about doing the right thing for the country and not just trying to get re elected to sty long enough to get the still overly generous parliamentary pension would be a good start but alas a pipedream,

If I remember rightly the justification for it's generosity was because of their limited tenure in the job. Guess what, I don't Know too many people who have jobs guarnateed. Bring the pollies back to the standard Super guarantee and they will soon work out a way to improve it for us all

The simple reality is that the super system has the potential to remove the need for most people to need access to a aged pension if it is used properly from when people first commence working and with appropriate contributions required from all parties involved. But we need to start now!

Quite franky I would be happy to have a increase in my tax (levy) if it went to my super account. (Can't trust them to spend it wisely so better come to me). We all know taxes will need to increase to support aging population. So why not start now at a lower increase and allow compounding etc.

I was not able to identify one negative out of the last budget for myself, Not even the proposed co payment as I have not been to a GP in 4 years, Yet if I was a low income earner I just got done over

Tortoise
March 16, 2015

Report after report but nothing is done. We almost need an autocracy to get the country moving forward rather than stand still.

John
March 13, 2015

Everyone ignores that in the early 1900s that taxes were increased to cater for old age pensions and the revenue from that increase was supposed to be for aged pensions but ended up being absorbed by other needs in consolidated revenue
Plus tax scales have decreased over the last 20 years esp. at the upper end

Mack Carson
November 28, 2019

Above.
Therein lies the problem.
UK and most of the Northern European country.s.
Holland,Sweden.Denmark etc.
Have a prepay pension system covered by voluntary payments from taxpayer. plus diverted assets from Gov't.Continually running, by generation after generation paying in/taking out.
Aust has same problem. Had. But stolen.
The main Problem is as above.
Keeping Whatever current governments sticky fingers out of the pie.
All materials coming out of the ground. Should belong to the people/Taxpayers.
and NO land or assets should be allowed to be sold Offshore.
Thank god us few War Babies left above the grass.
don't have too much longer to suffer this idiocy.
You can have it ALL to yourselves.

Jerome Lander
March 13, 2015

Nice summary article.

Globalisation and a knowledge economy really enable the informed, well educated and well informed to prosper legitimately to a greater degree than ever before. Government needs to do more to ensure that these fortunate people - such as many of those reading this article - do not also get ridiculously beneficial taxation arrangements! (such as is the case currently in retirement for large self-funded pensions).

Unfortunately, working longer will be particularly important for the less well to do. It is not entirely clear, however, whether despite an aging population there will be enough work for those of working age in the decades to come, as technology becomes capable of displacing so many of the jobs people do currently.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

A super consensus needed before the demographic tsunami

Demographic destiny: a snapshot of Australia in 40 years

Turning point: the 2020s baby boom retirement surge

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

How to help people with retirement spending decisions

Super funds will soon be required to offer retirement income strategies for members in decumulation. With uncertain returns, uncertain timelines, and different goals, it's possibly “the hardest, nastiest problem in finance".

Tips when taking large withdrawals from super

You want to take a lump sum from your super, but what's the best way? Should it come from you or your spouse, or the pension or accumulation account. There is a welcome flexibility to select the best outcome.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Charlie Munger and stock picks at the Sohn Conference

The Sohn Australia Conference brings together leading fund managers to chose their highest conviction stock in a 10-minute pitch. Here are their 2021 selections with Charlie Munger's wisdom as the star feature.

Interviews

John Woods on diversification using asset allocation

All fund managers now claim to take ESG factors into account, but a multi-asset ethical fund will look quite different from a mainstream fund. Faced with low fixed income returns, alternatives have a bigger role.

SMSF strategies

Don't believe the SMSF statistics on investment allocation

The ATO's data on SMSF asset allocation is as much as 27 months out-of-date and categories such as cash and global investments are reported incorrectly. We should question the motives of some who quote the numbers.

Investment strategies

Highlights of reader tips for young investors

In this second part on the reader responses with advice to younger people, we have selected a dozen highlights, but there are so many quality contributions that a full list of comments is also attached.

Investment strategies

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

Climate-related companies will experience exponential growth driven by consumer demand and government action. Investors who identify the right companies will benefit from four themes which will last decades.

Investment strategies

Inflation remains transitory due to strong long-term trends

There is momentum to stop calling inflation 'transitory' but this overlooks deep-seated trends. A longer-term view will see companies like ARB, Reece, Macquarie Telecom and CSL more valuable in a decade.

Infrastructure

Infrastructure and the road to recovery

Infrastructure assets experienced varying fortunes during the pandemic, from less travel at airports to strong activity in communications. On the road to recovery, what role does infrastructure play in a portfolio?

Economy

The three prices that everyone should worry about

Among the myriad of numbers that bombard us every day, three prices matter greatly to the world economy. Recent changes in these prices help to understand the potential for a global recovery and interest rates.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.