Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 163

Quant plus fundamental: two methods are better than one

When it comes to market forecasting, too many people thinking the same thing is almost always cause for concern. That said, in the current environment, an enormous amount of creative optimism is required to formulate a contrarian view.

Central bank activity saved the financial system from collapse in 2008 and stimulated the second-longest bull market in stocks. Unfortunately, the tools at their disposal were insufficient to engineer a return to high and inclusive rates of economic growth or durable financial stability. Terms like the New Normal, the New Neutral, or Secular Stagnation describe a global economy with sluggish growth, rising inequality, high unemployment and ever-increasing market volatility.

Rising demand for absolute returns

There has been significant asset price appreciation since the GFC. However, over the past 10 years, a traditional balanced portfolio allocating 60% to equities and 40% to fixed interest securities has only outperformed what most would consider a reasonable investment objective of CPI+5% in 41% of months on a rolling five-year basis. It is therefore not surprising that financial advisers and their clients are increasingly looking for new ways to build absolute return portfolios, where the investment objective is wealth creation rather than beating a traditional benchmark.

Portfolio construction, diversification, and the incorporation of alternative investment strategies all have roles to play in this endeavour. An ideal portfolio would likely contain non-correlated assets with positive return expectations. This means that all the assets in the portfolio would go up and down at different times - although the general direction would be positive. The ups and downs would partially cancel each other out and the investor would have a smooth, stable and stress free journey. Unfortunately, such assets are very difficult to come by, particularly for retail investors in Australia.

A fundamental approach to managing equity funds is normally associated with human insight and in-depth forward looking analysis across a narrow range of companies. With quantitative funds, the association is usually unbiased, disciplined, repeatable and scalable across a broad universe of stocks.

For some time, fundamental managers have recognised the value of incorporating quantitative techniques into their processes. Common examples of earlier approaches are: fundamental managers relying on quantitative screens to filter a large universe of stocks; and using multi-factor models to help managers control and eliminate exposure to unwanted risks.

Quantitative plus fundamental using unique data insights

The recent arrival of big data has ushered in a new era of investing, sometimes referred to as ‘quantamental’, which requires the seamless integration of quantitative and fundamental techniques. Obtaining valuable insights, often relating to future corporate earnings, from unrelated and unstructured sources requires the skills of creative analysts, expert programmers and significant computing power.

Twitter offers an intuitive example of this. It is now possible to obtain insights and indications of current stock trends by accessing all real-time tweets (approximately 6,000 per second) delivered via the Twitter Firehose service. People are better at many things but such analysis is beyond human capability. The demands are even greater for those managers who store tweets historically to reveal a changing pattern of sentiment and provide an advanced signal for a short term trading strategy.

The most valuable data is also the hardest to obtain and insights should be fundamentally generated from unique data sources, many of which would only ordinarily be used by the members of individual industries. Quantitative techniques are then used to scale these insights across a vast universe of industries and global stocks. Our new fund aims to deliver market neutral returns by simultaneously going long the companies with the best long-term prospects and short-selling those with the worst.

In the pharmaceutical industry as an example, the portfolio manager has developed an automated process to extract data from websites that allow doctors and patients to log complaints about the side effects of drugs. This frequently provides glimpses into future issues these companies or others providing drugs with similar chemical compositions may encounter. Trading strategies may then be developed which short sell these companies and go long on the companies marketing drugs with similar therapeutic application, but with fewer complaints.

The airline industry provides another good example of how the manager combines generally accepted valuation metrics with unique but common sense insights. In most developed countries, departure and arrival times of all flights are published electronically. If flights of a particular airline tend to take off late but arrive on time, it is likely that they have burned more fuel to catch up. That airline is thus operationally inefficient. An astute quantamental analyst can also rank airlines in order of baggage lost. Used in conjunction, these signals provide insights about future revenue because airlines with more late flights and more lost baggage are unlikely to retain their customers.

At its most simple, the quantamental approach involves two things. The first is the obtaining, aggregating and processing of information from numerous sources. The second is applying fundamental principles to generate differentiated returns. The result should be the construction of a well-diversified investment portfolio that provides superior outcomes in these challenging market conditions.

 

Adam Myers is Executive Director at Pengana Capital. They have brought the Pengana PanAgora Absolute Return Global Equities Fund to the Australian market. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   6 July 2016
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.