Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 203

Reader feedback from 2017 Survey

In a world where data is the new gold, the 2017 Reader Survey provided excellent feedback on who Cuffelinks readers are, their level of investment experience, what they like and don’t like, as well as their expectations of the newsletter and website. Thank you to the 2,135 people who participated in the survey, and the overwhelmingly positive support that Cuffelinks receives.

A summary of all results is linked here, and below are some highlights.

Reader demographics

We first asked respondents to categorise themselves based on career or investor type, and whether they use an adviser. More than one option could be chosen. About 54% said they were SMSF trustees, 44% were retired and almost 45% said they do not use a financial adviser. In sum, about 30% are market professionals working in wealth management.

Question two gave us a breakdown by age bracket.

It wasn’t a surprise to learn that most readers are over 55, but it was unexpected that a high 42% were 65 to 84 years old.

There is a solid group of almost 10% under the age of 44, but no doubt the readership corresponds with when people want more sophistication in their investment knowledge.

Distribution of existing investments

Questions three and five asked respondents about their current asset distribution (in and out of super) and their knowledge of different types of investment products. Showing the importance of the new superannuation caps, the highest category was balances over $1.6 million. Notably, this group held far more in assets outside super, but the majority of value is probably the family home.

Investments strongly favoured by SMSF trustees are direct holdings in Australian shares (24%), listed investment companies (16%), actively managed funds (12%), ETFs and A-REITS (both around 11%). These preferences didn’t change that much when investing outside super. We also had a solid group of readers who do not know enough about particular asset types, so we will continue to address this.

Knowledge gaps

Question four allowed respondents to tell us the one investment area they needed most help with.

The top three knowledge gaps were the selection of specific investments (33%), portfolio construction and asset allocation (25%), and tax efficiency (18%).

Cuffelinks will continue to target these areas, along with many other aspects of investing. We’re pleased to see portfolio construction and asset allocation receive prominence, and structuring for tax efficiency was surprisingly high.

Relevance and readability of articles

Questions six and seven asked about the relevance and readability of Cuffelinks’ articles. We’re happy to see that the vast majority of readers find our articles credible and professional, easy to understand and independent. Only 2.5% said the content was not useful for their own portfolios.

Article length is about right, with tiny minorities saying the articles are either too short or too long. Time is also a factor, with 10% saying they don’t have the time to read the full article. This is where our downloadable version of the newsletter might be preferable. Saving it to your computer or device allows you to read it later, perhaps offline.

How is Cuffelinks different?

We received almost 1,300 comments for this open question, so rather than print every comment, this word cloud shows the most regularly occurring words and phrases. Thank you for the overwhelmingly positive comments (and the word ‘bias’ below was invariably in the context of ‘lack of bias’).

Future direction

On new ways to finance the Cuffelinks business, we saw an aversion to direct marketing emails either for specific products (67%) or special offers (55%). About 54% of readers wouldn’t mind if Cuffelinks used banner advertising to generate revenue, and 10% more would welcome it where it helped in some way with their investing.

Opinion is mixed on whether Cuffelinks should run articles promoting specific products. While we have run articles in the past that promote, detail, or explain certain products, it’s usually done to inform readers of new products coming to market, emerging trends, or in the interests of financial education. However, over 60% of readers seemed comfortable with articles promoting specific products.

In question ten, we sought readers’ views on providing additional content and services.

The top two additions that would be welcomed are stock picking (37% on a regular basis, 35% occasionally) and macro/economic forecasting (48% on a regular basis, 42% occasionally). Traditionally, these are areas we have downplayed, because the future is so uncertain and much commentary is guesswork, and because of the proliferation of coverage elsewhere.

There was little appetite for lifestyle articles, but nearly half would like to see Cuffelinks run conferences. We hope to add resources to do more webinars, podcasting and videos.

Recommending Cuffelinks

Most encouraging, about 94% of respondents said they have already referred friends or colleagues to Cuffelinks or are highly likely or likely to, and only 6.5% said they are unlikely to. Without a big advertising budget, Cuffelinks relies on referrals support to grow our subscriber base.

Other feedback

We received over 1,370 comments for this question requesting general feedback, so rather than print every comment, here’s the word cloud. Again, thanks for the great feedback.

Leisa Bell is Assistant Editor at Cuffelinks.


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Reader feedback from our 2024 survey

Results from the 2015 Reader Survey

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.