Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 568

Reader feedback from our 2024 survey

Thank you to those who responded to last week’s reader survey. We love to hear what you think of Firstlinks and appreciate your engagement.

Some trends that have become clear already include:

  • Over 65% do not use a financial adviser
  • Favoured investments are Australian equities and cash deposits
  • Articles are mostly easy to understand, quick to read, and credible
  • Readers enjoy being able to comment on articles, and read others’ reactions
  • Keeping Firstlinks free and independent is important
  • Relatable, personal investing stories are well received
  • Most popular topics are superannuation / SMSFs and retirement planning

I’ve included a selection of comments below. Do you have anything to add?

If you had planned to do the survey ‘later’ and haven’t quite got there, we’ll be keeping it open until Wednesday 17th July.

Lastly, thanks to the majority of readers who recommend Firstlinks to friends and family. If you know someone who would benefit from regularly reading Firstlinks, please forward this subscription link to them.

 

Leisa Bell is Assistant Editor at Firstlinks.

 

Survey comments

  • Firstlinks is a great source of information that helps guide me in planning my own investment. I have been reading Firstlinks for years since the days of Cuffelinks.
  • Not all articles apply to my situation but I generally read them with varying degree of interest. Never too old to learn something new.
  • Easy to understand and often give no value or knowledge to the reader .Keep them hard but useful.
  • Relatable and educated articles. Like reading the comment sections as well.
  • Variety of topics, mostly not pushing anything, free, short pieces and the reports on LICs at the bottom.
  • Covers a multitude of issues. Allows access to authors of topics [if of interest] , allows reader feedback, provides factual info, w/out bias in most articles.
  • I find the articles quite well written and easy to follow. Not particularly bogged down with too much detail unless the subject demands it.
  • Needs a lot more focus if this newsletter is directed to the long term on market trends and the primary investment vehicles of ETFs and shares.
  • Wide range of topics excellent authors and comments section is always really worth reading and contributing to.
  • Not too many articles each week.
  • Relevant and interesting.
  • I like the super and retirement focus.
  • Aside from articles that inform about my personal situation, I also skim read most of the other articles for general interest.
  • The writing approach appears to be more considered, with great discussions in the comments. The overall feeling is that this is information being provided, as opposed to an attempt to sell the reader on a particular idea.
  • Takes time to digest and time is not always available.
  • Your focus on structuring of affairs and planning ahead for SMSF changes is excellent.
  • It must be hard to come up with new ideas. Keep up as you do, I am not looking for changes, but I do miss hearing from Graham H.
  • The occasional webinar would be useful depending on the topic. It is a very good newsletter already. Well done.
  • Keep doing what you have successfully been doing & don't put it behind a paywall!
  • Broad range of articles. I really like how people share personal experiences warts and all. James and Graham are best at this. (Mark Lamonica is also good at this). I don't do what they have done. But it is refreshing. Not just the standard stuff which is rehashed regularly. It makes me think. It sometimes opens up new ideas....that I can look into via Morningstar....and see how/if they work/don't for me.
  • I reckon you have the mix pretty right. A broad range of subjects and presenters. Not everything is relevant...but that is what happens with a broad range. I don't know what I don't know. So...keep throwing stuff at me. Sometimes some of the articles are biased to the authors' company. I know you are aware of that. Not sure it is a huge problem. Keep up the great work.
  • It's all about the curated articles. Some are very useful, others not. Which, I suspect, is what this survey is about.
  • While I check the new articles every week I don't read that many. There are a lot of articles about retirement and SMSFs that are not relevant to me as a middle-aged woman with no intention to start an SMSF. More content relevant to women, people who are some way away from retirement and those with more moderate income/investments would be great. There also too many articles by fund managers justifying the outlook for their active funds or LICs, but I suppose that is necessary to keep the website content free.
  • Steer readers towards long term investing. Avoid subjects and topics that are mainly short-term in nature and gambling such as Cryptocurrencies. In simple terms aim to be a high-class publication to attract high class readers.

 

5 Comments
Bee
July 17, 2024

Hi Again
(I can't add re-enter the survey, it disallows because I have already commented, so I am adding another thought here.) As someone invested in property, I separate out the Investor world of Firstlinks from more familiar territory. However when it did come up in Firstlinks some months ago, there did not seem to be the recognition of capital gains as being a significant part of the wealth creation in the comparison with other investments.

Istvan
July 14, 2024

Global data indicate that "Huston, we have a problem" (climate changes, global financial system, society decline, etc.; our current way of life, in general, is in crisis and/or in continuous decline in the past 8-10 years). The way we operate is simply not sustainable and new technology cannot solve everything, but we don't want to hear, or acknowledge any of this (i.e. not visible and/or considered anywhere in our generally optimistic view of the investment universe).
Note: Past performance is not indicative of the future. :) (The future I cannot see, but I'm a pessimistic optimist.)

john
July 14, 2024

Firstlinks is a terrific source of balanced and educational information while at the same time being inspiring

Lakshmi
July 12, 2024

First Links' articles are informative and easy to read. Excellent mix of topics which keep the readers well informed. I look forward to reading them each week.

charles
July 11, 2024

In the interests of recognizing the complete investment universe, my memory of the survey is that it did not include recognition of investments in Corporate Bonds or direct real estate although it did include things like cryptocurrencies. I think this is out of balance.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Reader feedback from 2017 Survey

Results from the 2015 Reader Survey

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.