Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 374

Reporting season winners and losers in listed property trusts

The August 2020 results were the first real chance investors have had to properly look under the bonnet and dissect the performance of listed A-REITs (property trusts) since the onset of COVID-19. Not surprisingly, there were wide variances reported, given the impact that forced lockdowns have had on the various property sectors. However, the output was better than initially feared back in March 2020 when COVID-19 first hit.

Valuations across the A-REIT sector now look compelling especially relative to bond yields. The A-REIT sector is priced on an FY21 dividend yield of 4.8%, a 390 basis point spread over 10-year bonds, and well above its long-term average of 200 basis points.

We believe market dislocations create good buying opportunities for active managers. We continue to focus on select A-REITs with high quality portfolios (assets, lease covenants and longer lease tenures) and strong balance sheets (low gearing, diversified funding sources, longer duration debt) which trade on cheap multiples (low P/E and large discount to NTA).

Fund manager A-REITs outperform retail mall A-REITs

On average, A-REITs delivered annual EPS (earnings per share) growth of approximately -1.1% for the year ending June 2020. Yet this headline hides the significant dispersion across the different sectors.

Strong performances were recorded by the fund manager A-REITs (including Goodman Group ASX:GMG and Charter Hall ASX:CHC) and seniors living operators (including Ingenia Communities ASX:INA), which delivered EPS growth of +28.8% and +5.2% respectively, while not surprisingly, retail mall A-REITs (including Scentre ASX:SCG and Vicinity ASX:VCX) were the weakest with average EPS growth of -29.3%.

Figure 1: A-REIT Sector Earnings Growth - FY20

But it’s all about the cashflow

While EPS numbers provide a useful measure of performance the focus this reporting season was on cashflow. Leading into this reporting season, we knew things would be different given the difficult trading operating environment.

A-REITs have had to contend not only with enforced closures (e.g. pubs) but also the federal government’s Code of Conduct legislation for landlords and tenants which mandated that landlords would be required to waive or defer rent to small and medium enterprises tenants who had annual turnover less than $50 million and had a greater than 30% loss in revenue.

The extent of the impacts on individual A-REITs were influenced by a mixture of sector focus, tenant covenant, and management skills. Clearly those A-REITs whose portfolios were more leveraged to the consumer and small to median enterprises fared worse (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Proportion of Rent Collected – March 2020 to June 2020

A-REITs took different approaches to account for these shortfalls in rent which made assessing individual earnings performance less reliable than usual. Hence the assessment of cashflow became key.

Given the cash shortfalls across several REITs, dividends were cut by an average of -9.6% for the past financial year, although excluding retail mall A-REITs the result was only -4.8%.

A quick take on each sector

Turning to the A-REIT sub-sectors, both industrial and office delivered stable results, and despite all the noise about ‘working from home’, cash collected from rents remained high.

In contrast, the performance of retail A-REITs was weaker, particularly those with larger malls that are more exposed to discretionary focused retail. In particular, Scentre Group (ASX:SCG) and Vicinity Centres (ASX:VCX) reported very weak results with large falls in foot traffic, tenant sales, reported earnings, and asset values. Their performance reflects both the cyclical elements associated with a slowing economy and the acceleration of the structural changes from the growth in online shopping.

The momentum in online shopping was well under way before COVID-19 but as a number of industry players have noted, the COVID-19 lockdowns forced consumers to go online in greater number and frequency, accelerating the shift away from physical stores to digital shopping by at least five years.

Residential developers, Stockland (ASX:SGP) and Mirvac (ASX:MGR), delivered flat growth in settlement volumes on stable margins, but promisingly net deposits were up about 20% which indicates a stronger outlook. Both groups referred to the positive affect on sales activity from recent increases in government stimulus programs for housing.

Property fund managers continued their recent trend of strong growth in FUM and earnings, given the supportive backdrop of low interest rates and demand for yield-orientated investments. Standout performers in this category were Charter Hall (ASX:CHC) and Goodman Group (ASX:GMG).

Select alternative sectors, such as rural and service stations, were largely unaffected by the effects of COVID-19 and delivered solid results. In this context we highlight good results from Rural Funds (ASX:RFF), Waypoint REIT (ASX:WPR) and APN Convenience REIT (ASX:AQR).

Seniors living operators such as Ingenia Communities (ASX:INA) continue to benefit from Australia’s ageing population and low levels of supply of quality seniors living. These groups were generally able to drive strong EPS growth from their development of new stock and high occupancy from existing villages.

Balance sheets were under the microscope

The emergence of COVID-19 has acted as a trigger for some asset softening across the commercial property sector. But as with EPS results, the damage was largely contained to large retail malls, with mall values falling on average by 11% with some further dilution to net tangible assets (NTA) coming from the cash shortfalls of rent collected.

Figure 3: NTA Growth – 6 Months to June 2020

Balance sheets overall came out in reasonable shape. Some A-REITs went to market and raised capital through April to June to strengthen their balance sheets. The sector appears to have learnt the lessons of the GFC, coming into the COVID-19 crisis with more diversified funding sources, lower gearing – at 30 June the average gearing level was circa 26% - and longer debt tenor (average tenor is circa 5 years).

No guidance but clear upside

Earnings guidance was hard to come by this reporting season, with only a handful of A-REITs willing to stick their neck out given Melbourne is still in lockdown and the timing of a vaccine remains unclear.

However, there are enough signs to be optimistic on the outlook. Operating performance for retail focused A-REITs have started to improve (excluding Melbourne assets), rent collections are up across most sectors in July and August and as noted earlier, most balance sheets are in good shape.

While the potential of further COVID-19 waves cannot be ignored, the most likely outcome is for COVID-19 domestic cases to subside or the emergence of vaccine which would be positive for both the economy and A-REITs. We believe given the significant variance across the underlying A-REIT sub sectors and individual A-REITs that this will continue to be a market for active managers to make selective investments.

 

Jonathan Kriska is Portfolio Manager, Listed Securities at Charter Hall Maxim Property Securities. Charter Hall is a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any person, and investors should take professional investment advice before acting.

 

5 Comments
Percy Allan
September 29, 2020

Good roundup. Thanks.

Graeme
September 10, 2020

If Retail REITs have retail businesses as tenants and Industrial REITs have industrial companies as tenants, do Fund Manager REITs only have fund managers as tenants?
I've invested in Property Trusts / REITs for 30 years and have never come across that classification before.

Charter Hall
September 13, 2020

Fund Manager A-REITs like Charter Hall and Goodman have funds management platforms as part of their investment structure. In the case of Goodman they have $16.1bn of assets on their balance sheet at 30 June 2020 comprising incoming producing industrial assets leased to a range of tenants ($1.8bn), developments either held as inventory or under way ($3.1bn), co-investments ($7.8bn) in partnerships and funds they manage on behalf of other investors and $3.4bn in cash and other investments. They have circa $46bn in external funds under management across industrial property and business parks in Australia and many other countries that they manage on behalf of institutional investors. So they generate earnings from rent, development profits and fees from managing the external funds and partnerships. In the case of Charter Hall, they have $2.4bn of assets on their balance sheet. The majority of which, $1.8bn, is co-invested in the $41.8 bn in funds and partnerships they manage across office, convenience retail, industrial & logistics and social infrastructure assets. In FY20, they generated $110.8m in EBITDA from their investments in these funds and partnerships and $156.6m in EBITDA from the management fees, transaction and performance fees, development fees and leasing fees that they charge the funds and partnerships in which they manage.

George
September 09, 2020

Here's hoping there's no second wave in NSW or Queensland.

PB
September 09, 2020

Great thought leadership

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Focus on quality yield, not near-term income

Listed property headlines disguise full story

The big lessons from the A-REIT reporting season

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.